Digging into UML models to remove performance antipatterns

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 9-16

  Cortellessa, Vittorio ^a   Di Marco, Antinisca ^a   Eramo, Romina ^a   Pierantonio, Alfonso ^a   Trubiani, Catia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

Author keywords

antipatterns; object constraint language; software performance engineering; unified modeling language

Indexed keywords

ANTI-PATTERNS; BAD PRACTICES; DESIGN MODELS; OBJECT CONSTRAINT LANGUAGE; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS; PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE ENGINEERINGS; SPECIFIC PROBLEMS; STATIC AND DYNAMIC; UML MODEL;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DESIGN; LINGUISTICS; MODELS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE; VERIFICATION;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 77954569124     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1808877.1808880     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. JESS, the Rule Engine for the Java Platform, http://www.jessrules.com/ jess/index.shtml.
2. OCL 2.0 Specification, OMG, http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/06-05- 01.
3. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification, OMG, http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/ doc?formal/05-07-04.
4. UML Profile for MARTE, OMG, http://www.omgmarte.org/Documents/ Specifications/08- 06-09.pdf.
5. WinPEPSY-QNS, a tool for calculating performance measures of queueing networks, http://www7.informatik.unierlangen.de/prbazan/pepsy.
6. S. Balsamo, A. Di Marco, P. Inverardi, and M. Simeoni. Model-based performance prediction in software development: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(5):295-310, 2004.
7. V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, and C. Trubiani. Performance antipatterns as logical predicates. In IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, 2010. to appear.
8. V. Cortellessa and R. Mirandola. Prima-uml: a performance validation incremental methodology on early uml diagrams. Sci. Comput. Program., 44(1):101-129, 2002.
9. C. Hirel, R. Sahner, X. Zang, and K. Trivedi. Reliability and Performability Modeling using SHARPE 2000. In Computer Performance Evaluation: modelling techniques and tools, volume 1786 of LNCS, pages 345-349, 2000.
10. R. Jain. Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis. 1991.
11. T. Parsons and J. Murphy. Detecting performance antipatterns in component based enterprise systems. Journal of Object Technology, 7(3):55-90, 2008.
12. C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams. Software performance antipatterns. In 2nd International Workshop on Software and Performance, 2000.
13. C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams. More new software performance antipatterns: Even more ways to shoot yourself in the foot. In Computer Measurement Group Conference, 2003.
14. J. Xu. Rule-based automatic software performance diagnosis and improvement. In WOSP'08, Workshop on Software Performance, pages 1-12, 2008.