Comparison of mitral valve area by pressure half-time and proximal isovelocity surface area method in patients with mitral stenosis: Effect of net atrioventricular compliance

European Journal of Echocardiography

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 283-290

  Salem Omar, Alaa Mabrouk ^a,b   Tanaka, Hidekazu ^a   Abdeldayem, Tarek Khairy ^c   Sadek, Ayman S ^c   Raslaan, Halah ^b   Al Sherbiny, Ashraf ^b   Yamawaki, Kohei ^a   Ryo, Keiko ^a   Fukuda, Yuko ^a   Norisada, Kazuko ^a   Tatsumi, Kazuhiro ^a   Onishi, Tetsuari ^a   Matsumoto, Kensuke ^a   Kawai, Hiroya ^a   Hirata, Ken Ichi ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Egypt)

^c Ain Shams University Hospital   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Mitral stenosis; Net atrioventricular compliance; Pressure half time; Proximal isovelocity surface area method

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE AREA; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; NET ATRIOVENTRICULAR COMPLIANCE; PRESSURE HALF TIME METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL ISOVELOCITY SURFACE AREA METHOD; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 79953843969     PISSN: 15252167     EISSN: 15322114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq194     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Levang OW et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231-43. (Pubitemid 36834640)
2. Faletra F, Pezzano A J., Fusco R, Mantero A, Corno R, Crivellaro W et al. Measurement of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis: four echocardiographic methods compared with direct measurement of anatomic orifices. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1190-7. (Pubitemid 26376994)
3. Nakatani S, Masuyama T, Kodama K, Kitabatake A, Fujii K, Kamada T. Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods. Circulation 1988;77:78-85. (Pubitemid 18031003)
4. Rifkin RD, Harper K, Tighe D. Comparison of proximal isovelocity surface area method with pressure half-time and planimetry in evaluation of mitral stenosis. JAm Coll Cardiol 1995;26:458-65.
5. Hatle L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A. Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1979;60:1096-104. (Pubitemid 10195193)
6. Palacios IF. What is the gold standard to measure mitral valve area postmitral balloon valvuloplasty? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;33:315-6.
7. Flachskampf FA, Weyman AE, Gillam L, Liu CM, Abascal VM, Thomas JD. Aortic regurgitation shortens Doppler pressure half-time in mitral stenosis: clinical Evidence, in vitro simulation and theoretic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16: 396-404. (Pubitemid 20245859)
8. Kim HK, Kim YJ, Chang SA, Kim DH, Sohn DW, Oh BH et al. Impact of cardiac rhythm on mitral valve area calculated by the pressure half time method in patients with moderate or severe mitral stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22:42-7.
9. Ikawa H, Enya E, Hirano Y, Uehara H, Ozasa Y, Yamada S et al. Can the proximal isovelocity surface area method calculate stenotic mitral valve area in patients with associated moderate to severe aortic regurgitation? Analysis using low aliasing velocity of 10% of the peak transmitral velocity. Echocardiography 2001;18:89-95. (Pubitemid 32281371)
10. Mohan JC, Mukherjee S, Kumar A, Arora R, Patel AR, Pandian NG. Does chronic mitral regurgitation influence Doppler pressure half-time-derived calculation of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis? Am Heart J 2004;148:703-9. (Pubitemid 39349392)
11. Rodriguez L, Thomas JD, Monterroso V, Weyman AE, Harrigan P, Mueller LN et al. Validation of the proximal flow convergence method. Calculation of orifice area in patients with mitral stenosis. Circulation 1993;88:1157-65. (Pubitemid 23264034)
12. Deng YB, Matsumoto M, Wang XF, Liu L, Takizawa S, Takekoshi N et al. Estimation of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by the flow convergence region method: selection of aliasing velocity.JAm Coll Cardiol1994;24:683-9. (Pubitemid 24295743)
13. Messika-Zeitoun D, Fung Yiu S, Cormier B, Iung B, Scott C, Vahanian A et al. Sequential assessment of mitral valve area during diastole using colour M-mode flow convergence analysis: new insights into mitral stenosis physiology. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1244-53. (Pubitemid 36834641)
14. Schwammenthal E, Vered Z, Agranat O, Kaplinsky E, Rabinowitz B, Feinberg MS. Impact of atrioventricular compliance on pulmonary artery pressure in mitral stenosis: an exercise echocardiographic study. Circulation 2000;102:2378-84.
15. Kim HK, Kim YJ, Shin JI, Hwang SJ, Jo SH, Park JS et al. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic findings in patients with mitral stenosis undergoing percutaneous mitral commissurotomy comparing those with chronic atrial fibrillation versus those with normal sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1153-6.
16. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA et al. Rec-ommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006;7:79-108.
17. Sunil Roy TN, Krishnan MN, Koshy C, Sajeev CG, Francis J, Velayudhan CC et al. Comparison of proximal isovelocity surface area method and pressure half time method for evaluation of mitral valve area in patients undergoing balloon mitral valvotomy. Echocardiography 2005;22:707-12. (Pubitemid 44933456)
18. Voelker W, Regele B, Dittmann H, Mauser M, Ickrath O, Schmid KM et al. Effect of heart rate on transmitral flow velocity profile and Doppler measurements of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. Eur Heart J 1992;13:152-9.
19. Gonzalez MA, Child JS, Krivokapich J. Comparison of two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography and intracardiac hemodynamics for quantification of mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:327-32. (Pubitemid 17136266)
20. Messika-Zeitoun D, Meizels A, Cachier A, Scheuble A, Fondard O, Brochet E et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of the mitral valve area before and after percuta-neous mitral commissurotomy: the pressure half-time method revisited. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1409-14. (Pubitemid 41821190)
21. Bennis A, Drighil A, Tribouilloy C, Chraibi N. Clinical application in routine prac-tice of the proximalflow convergence method to calculate the mitral surface area in mitral valve stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002;18:443-51. (Pubitemid 36007888)
22. Centamore G, Galassi AR, Evola R, Lupo L, Galassi A. The "proximal isovelocity surface area" method in assessing mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis and associated aortic regurgitation. G Ital Cardiol 1997;27:133-40. (Pubitemid 127501680)
23. Lee TY, Tseng CJ, Chiao CD, Chiou CW, Mar GY, Liu CP et al. Clinical applica-bility for the assessment of the valvular mitral stenosis severity with Doppler echocardiography and the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method. Echocardiography 2004;21:1-6. (Pubitemid 38183764)
24. Thomas JD, Weyman AE. Doppler mitral pressure half-time: a clinical tool in search oftheoreticaljustification.JAm Coll Cardiol 1987;10:923-9. (Pubitemid 17163119)
25. Degertekin M, Basaran Y, Gencbay M, Yaymaci B, Dindar I, Turan F. Validation of flow convergence region method in assessing mitral valve area in the course of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic studies. Am Heart J 1998; 135:207-14. (Pubitemid 28139158)
26. Messika-Zeitoun D, Cachier A, Brochet E, Cormier B, Iung B, Vahanian A. Evaluation of mitral valve area by the proximal isovelocity surface area method in mitral stenosis: could it be simplified? Eur J Echocardiogr 2007;8:116-21. (Pubitemid 46112122)
27. Li M, Dery JP, Dumesnil JG, Boudreault JR, Jobin J, Pibarot P. Usefulness of measuring net atrioventricular compliance by Doppler echocardiography in patients with mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:432-5. (Pubitemid 41058877)
28. Cannon SR, Richards KL, Crawford M. Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula. Circulation 1985;71:1170-8. (Pubitemid 15036364)
29. Odemuyiwa O, Hall RJ. Assessing the severity of valve stenosis. Br Heart J 1986; 55:117-9.
30. Kim HK, Kim YJ, Hwang SJ, Park JS, Chang HJ, Sohn DW et al. Hemodynamic and prognostic implications of net atrioventricular compliance in patients with mitral stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:482-6.
31. Uzun M, Baysan O, Erinc K, Ozkan M, Sag C, Genc C et al. A simple different method to use proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) for measuring mitral valve area. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2005;21:633-40. (Pubitemid 43055232)