Mining enriched contextual information of scientific collaboration: A meso perspective

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 831-845

  He, Bing ^a   Ding, Ying ^a   Ni, Chaoqun ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE DEGREE; CLUSTERING COEFFICIENT; COAUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION; GLOBAL TOPOLOGY; LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE; NOVEL METHODS; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; SUBGRAPHS; TIME SPAN; TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; UNIT OF ANALYSIS;

TOPOLOGY;

DATA MINING;

EID: 79953842316     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21510     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Albert, R., &, Barabási, A.L., (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Review Modern Physics, 74, 47-97.
2. Barabási, A.L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., &, Vicsek, T., (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311, 590-614. (Pubitemid 34782622)
3. Beaver, D.D., (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present and future. Scientometrics, 52, 365-377. (Pubitemid 33594288)
4. Beaver, D. deB., &, Rosen, R., (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 65-84.
5. Beaver, D. deB., &, Rosen, R., (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration: Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799-1830. Scientometrics, 1, 133-149.
6. Borgman, C.L., &, Furner, J., (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In, B. Cronin, (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 36, pp. 3-72). Medford, NJ: Information Today. (Pubitemid 36385203)
7. Börner, K., Dall'Asta, L., Ke, W.M., &, Vespignani, A., (2005). Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of coauthorship teams. Complexity, 10 (4), 57-67. (Pubitemid 40772243)
8. Clarke, B.L., (1967). Communication patterns of biomedical researchers. Federation Proceeding, 26, 1288-1292.
9. Cohen, J., (2000). Balancing the collaboration equation. Science, 288, 2155-2159. (Pubitemid 30429588)
10. Cronin, B., (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices ? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 558-569. (Pubitemid 32471523)
11. Egghe, L., Goovaerts, M., &, Kretschmer, H., (2008). Collaboration and productivity: An investigation in scientometrics and in a university repository. Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2 (1), 83-89.
12. Estrada, E., &, Rodríguez-Velázquez, J.A., (2005). Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Physical Review E, 71 (5), 056103.
13. Faloutsos, C., McCurley, K.S., &, Tomkins, A., (2004). Fast discovery of connection subgraphs. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. (pp. 118-127). New York: ACM Press. (Pubitemid 40114922)
14. Finholt, T.A., &, Olson, G.M., (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, 8 (1), 28-36.
15. Glänzel, W., (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48, 121-150.
16. Glänzel, W., &, Schubert, A., (2001). Double effort-double impact? A critical view at international coauthorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50, 199-214. (Pubitemid 33594278)
17. Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S., &, Sonnenwald, D.H., (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 952-965.
18. Katz, J., (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31 (1), 31-43.
19. Katz, J.S., &, Martin, B.R., (1997). What is research collaboration ? Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
20. Koren, Y., North, S.C., &, Volinsky, C., (2006). Measuring and extracting proximity in networks. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. (pp. 242-255). New York: ACM Press.
21. Kretschmer, H., (1994). Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics, 30 (1), 363-369.
22. Leydesdorff, L., &, Wagner, C.S., (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2 (4), 317-325.
23. Liu, X.M., Bollen, J., Nelson, M.L., &, Van de Sompel, H., (2005). Coauthorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management, 41 (6), 1462-1480. (Pubitemid 41050718)
24. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., &, Sivertsen, G., (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17 (1), 101-126.
25. Maglaughlin, K.L., &, Sonnenwald, D.H., (2005). Factors that impact interdisciplinary natural science research collaboration in academia. Proceedings of the Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 499-508).
26. Melin, G., &, Persson, O., (1996). Studying research collaboration using coauthorships. Scientometrics, 36, 363-377. (Pubitemid 126449889)
27. Milgram, S., (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2, 60-67.
28. Moody, J., (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69 (2), 213-238. (Pubitemid 38727984)
29. Narin, F., Stevens, E.S., &, Whitlow, E.S., (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multi-nationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21, 313-324.
30. Newman, M.E.J., (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks: I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64 (1), 016131.
31. Newman, M.E.J., (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks: II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64, 016132.
32. Newman, M.E.J., (2001c). Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 64 (2), 025102.
33. Newman, M.E.J., (2001d). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 404-409. (Pubitemid 32105053)
34. Newman, M.E.J., (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 5200-5205. (Pubitemid 38469127)
35. Persson, O., &, Beckmann, M., (1995). Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties. Scientometrics, 33, 351-366.
36. Persson, O., Glänzel, W., &, Danell, R., (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60, 421-432. (Pubitemid 38926350)
37. Ramakrishnan, C., Milnor, W.H., Perry, M., &, Sheth, A.P., (2005). Discovering informative connection subgraphs in multi-relational graphs. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 7 (2), 56-63.
38. Schubert, A., &, Braun, T., (1990). International collaboration in the sciences, 1981-1985. Scientometrics, 19, 3-10.
39. Smith, M., (1958). The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. American Psychologist, 13, 596-599.
40. Sonnenwald, D.H., (2007). Scientific collaboration: A synthesis of challenges and strategies. In, B. Cronin, (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 41, pp. 643-681). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
41. Tamblyn, R., Huang, A., Kawasumi, Y., Bartlett, G., Grad, R., &, Jacques, A., et al. (2006). The development and evaluation of an integrated electronic prescribing and drug management system for primary care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13 (2), 148-159. (Pubitemid 43332905)
42. Tamblyn, R., Huang, A., Taylor, L., Kawasumi, Y., Bartlett, G., &, Grad, R., et al. (2008). A randomized trial of the effectiveness of on-demand versus computer-triggered drug decision support in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15 (4), 430-438. (Pubitemid 351885165)
43. Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., &, Su, Z., (2008). ArnetMiner: Extraction and mining of academic social networks. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. (pp. 990-998). New York: ACM Press.
44. Tong, H., &, Faloutsos, C., (2006). Center-piece subgraphs: Problem definition and fast solutions. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
45. Wanner, R.A., Lewis, L.S., &, Gregorio, D.I., (1981). Research productivity in academia: A comparative study of the sciences, social sciences and humanities. Sociology of Education, 54 (4), 238-253.
46. Wasserman, S., &, Faust, K., (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
47. Yan, E.J., &, Ding, Y., (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (10), 2107-2118.
48. Yan, E., Ding, Y., &, Zhu, Q., (2010). Mapping library and information science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics, 83 (1), 115-131.