Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile™ method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 383-388

  Alford, Timothy J ^a   Roberts, W Eugene ^a   Hartsfield, James K ^b   Eckert, George J ^c   Snyder, Ronald J ^d  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Private Practice of Orthodontics   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical outcomes; Finishing; SureSmile ; Treatment time

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79953839354     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/071810-413.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Mah J, Sachdeva R. Computer-assisted orthodontic treatment: the SureSmileH process. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:85-87.
2. Sachdeva R. SureSmileH technology in a patient-centered orthodontic practice. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35:245-253.
3. Sachdeva R, Fruge JF, Fruge AM, et al. SureSmileH: a report of clinical findings. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:297-314.
4. Orthod. 2009;43:161-174.
5. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Riolo ML, Owens SE, Bills ED. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:589-599.
6. Pinskaya YB, Hsieh TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK. Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:533-543. (Pubitemid 39452582)
7. Deguchi T, Honjo T, Fukunaga T, Miyawaki S, Roberts WE, Yamamoto TT. Clinical assessment of orthodontic outcomes with the peer assessment rating, discrepancy index, objective grading system, and comprehensive clinical assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:434-443. (Pubitemid 40488785)
8. Knierim K, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK. Assessing treatment outcomes for a graduate orthodontic program: follow up study for classes of 2001-2003. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:643e1-648e11.
9. Campbell CL, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK, Rong Q. Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132: 822-829.
10. Vu CQ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK, Ofner S. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:9.e1-9.e13.
11. Detterline DA. Comparison Between Clinical Outcomes of 0.018-Inch and 0.022-Inch Bracket Slot Size Using the ABO Objective Grading System [unpublished MSD thesis]. Indianapolis, Ind: Indiana University School of Dentistry; 2009.
12. Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A. Outcome assessment of Invisalign2 and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:292-298. (Pubitemid 41316422)
13. Kalange JT, Thomas RG. Indirect bonding: a comprehensive review of the literature. Semin Orthod. 2007;13:3-10.
14. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:125-139.
15. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:180-187.
16. Onyeaso CO, Beogole EA. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:248-252.
17. Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE, et al. The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:270-278. (Pubitemid 38328551)
18. Riolo ML, Owens SE, Dykhouse VJ, et al. ABO resident clinical outcomes study: case complexity as measured by the discrepancy index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:161-163. (Pubitemid 40327131)
19. Sander FM, Sander C, Roberts WE, Sander FG. Bending properties of superelastic nickel titanium archwires. J Clin Orthod. 2008;42:581-586.
20. McKee IW, Williamson PC, Lam EW, Heo G, Glover KE, Major PW. The accuracy of 4 panoramic units in the projection of mesiodistal tooth angulations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:166-175. (Pubitemid 40418256)
21. Garcia-Figueroa MA, Raboud DW, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:93-99.
22. Saxe AK, Louie LJ, Mah J. Efficiency and effectiveness of SureSmileH. World J Orthod. 2010;11:16-22.