Assessing treatment outcomes for a graduate orthodontics program: Follow-up study for the classes of 2001-2003

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 130, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 648.e1-648.e11

  Knierim, Kristin ^a   Roberts, W Eugene ^b   Hartsfield Jr , James ^b  

^a Indiana University ^*

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750828937     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.014     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Pinskaya Y.B., Hsieh T.J., Roberts W.E., and Hartsfield J.K. Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004) 533-543
2. Abei Y., Nelson S., Amberman B.D., and Hans M.G. Comparing orthodontic treatment outcome between orthodontists and general dentists with the ABO index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004) 544-548
3. Pickering E.A., and Vig P. The occlusal index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 2 (1975) 47-51
4. Summers C.J. The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod 59 (1971) 552-567
5. Younis J.W., Vig K.W., Rinchuse D.J., and Weyant R.J. A validation study of three indexes of orthodontic treatment need in the United States. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 25 (1997) 358-362
6. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., Roberts C.T., and Andrews M. The PAR index (peer assessment rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 14 (1992) 180-187
7. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., O'Brien K.D., Buchanan I.B., Jones R., Stephens C.D., et al. The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 14 (1992) 125-139
8. Beglin F.M., Firestone A.R., Vig K.W., Beck F.M., Kuthy R.A., and Wade D. A comparison of the reliability and validity of 3 occlusal indexes of orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120 (2001) 240-246
9. Casko J.S., Vaden J.L., Kokich V.G., Damone J., James R.D., Cangialosi T.J., et al., American Board of Orthodontics. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 (1998) 589-599
10. Deguchi T., Honjo T., Fukunaga T., Miyawaki S., Roberts W.E., and Takano-Yamamoto T. Clinical assessment of orthodontic outcomes with the peer assessment rating, discrepancy index, objective grading system, and comprehensive clinical assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 434-443
11. Yang-Powers L.C., Sadowsky C., Rosenstein S., and BeGole E.A. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 (2002) 451-455
12. Nett B.C., and Huang G.J. Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 444-450
13. Hsieh T.J., Pinskaya Y., and Roberts W.E. Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes: early treatment versus late treatment. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 162-170
14. Martin D. Comprehensive evaluation of posttreatment skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes (2003), Indiana University, Indianapolis [thesis]
15. American Board of Orthodontics. Why case reports do not pass the ABO phase III clinical examination. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110 (1996) 559-560
16. Damone J. ABO working to improve board-certification process. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121 2 (2002) 16A-17A
17. James R.D. Objective cast and panoramic radiograph grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 (2002) 450
18. ABO measuring gauge. Model grading system. Available from: http://www.americanboardortho.com/professionals/clinicalexam/casereportpresentation/gradingsystem/gsys20.aspx. Accessed on October 31, 2006.
19. Hsieh T.J. Assessment of orthodontic treatment results: two-phase treatment (early intervention) vs. one-phase treatment (late intervention) (2003), Indiana University, Indianapolis [thesis]
20. Poling R. A method of finishing the occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115 (1999) 476-487
21. Vig K.W., Weyant R., Vayda D., O'Brien K., and Bennett E. Orthodontic process and outcome: efficacy studies-strategies for developing process and outcome measures: a new era in orthodontics. Clin Orthod Res 1 (1998) 147-155
22. Cook D.R., Harris E.F., and Vaden J.L. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 707-712
23. McGuinness N.J., and McDonald J.P. The influence of operator changes on orthodontic treatment times and results in a postgraduate teaching environment. Eur J Orthod 20 (1998) 159-167
24. Willems G., Heidbuchel R., Verdonck A., and Carels C. Treatment and standard evaluation using the peer assessment rating index. Clin Oral Invest 5 (2001) 57-62