Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 248-252

  Onyeaso, Chukwudi Ochi ^a   Begole, Ellen A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN   (Nigeria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL CARE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORTHODONTICS; PEER REVIEW; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DENTAL MODELS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PEER REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33846616495     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.045     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., O'Brien K.D., Buchanan I.B., Jones R., Stephens C.D., et al. The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 14 (1992) 125-139
2. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., Stephens C.D., Webb W.G., Roberts C.T., and Andrews M. Orthodontics in the general dental service of England and Wales: a critical assessment of standards. Br Dent J 174 (1993) 315-329
3. O'Brien K.D., Shaw W.C., and Roberts C.T. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 20 (1993) 25-35
4. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., Roberts C.T., and Andrews M. The PAR index (peer assessment rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 14 (1992) 180-187
5. Buchanan I.B., Russell J., and Clark J.D. Practical application of the PAR index: an illustrative comparison of the outcome of treatment using two fixed appliance techniques. Br J Orthod 23 (1996) 351-357
6. Kerr W.J.S., Buchanan I.B., and McColl J.H. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances. Br J Orthod 20 (1993) 351-357
7. Kerr W.J.S., Buchanan I.B., McNair F.I., and McColl J.H. Factors influencing the outcome and duration of removable appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 16 (1994) 181-186
8. Birkeland K., Furevik J., Boe O.E., and Wisth P.J. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR index. Eur J Orthod 19 (1997) 279-288
9. Cons N.C., Jenny J., and Kohout F.J. DAI: the dental aesthetic index (1986), College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City
10. Cons N.C., Mruthyunjaya Y.C., and Pollard S.T. Distribution of occlusal traits in a sample of 1,337 children aged 15-18 residing in upstate New York. Int Dent J 28 (1978) 154-164
11. Proshek J.M., Jenny J., Cons N.C., Frazier P.J., Summers C.J., and Mruthyunjaya Y.C. A factor analysis of traits as measured by COCSTOC-MOT to identify occlusion trait combinations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 7 (1979) 274-282
12. Ast D.B., Carlos J.P., and Cons N.C. The prevalence and characteristics of malocclusion among senior high school students in upstate New York. Am J Orthod 51 (1965) 437-445
13. Jenny J., Cons N.C., Kohout F.J., and Frazier P.J. Test of a method to determine socially acceptable occlusal conditions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 8 (1980) 424-433
14. World Health Organization International Collaborative Study of Oral Health Outcomes (ICS II), document 2: oral data collection instrument and evaluative criteria (1989), World Health Organization, Geneva
15. Beglin F.M., Firestone A.R., Vig K.W., Beck F.M., Kuthy R.A., and Wade D. A comparison of the reliability and validity of 3 occlusal indexes of orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120 (2001) 240-246
16. Cons N.C., and Jenny J. Comparing perceptions of dental aesthetics in the USA with those in eleven ethnic groups. Int Dent J 44 (1994) 489-494
17. Danyluk K., Lavelle C., and Hassard T. Potential application of the dental aesthetic index to prioritize the orthodontic service needs in a publicly funded dental program. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 (1999) 279-286
18. The American Board of Orthodontics. ABO objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. Available at: www.americanboardortho.com/professionals/road to cert/phase III/Grading System 2004 Accessed February 2005.
19. Daniels C., and Richmond S. the development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod 27 (2000) 149-162
20. Richmond S., Ikonomou C., Williams B., Ramel S., Rolfe B., and Kurol J. Orthodontic treatment standards in a public group practice in Sweden. Swed Dent J 25 (2001) 137-144
21. Firestone A.R., Beck M., Beglin F.M., and Vig K.W.L. Validity of the index of complexity, outcome, and need. Angle Orthod 72 (2002) 15-20
22. Richmond S., Ikonomou C., Williams B., and Rolfe B. Orthodontic treatment standards in Greece. Hel Orthod Rev 4 (2001) 9-20
23. Liepa A., Urtane I., Richmond S., and Dunstan F. Orthodontic treatment need in Latvia. Eur J Orthod 25 (2000) 279-284
24. Baume L.J., and Marechaux S. Uniform methods for the epidemiologic assessment of malocclusion. Am J Orthod 66 (1974) 121-129
25. McLain J.B., and Proffit W.R. Oral health status in the United States: prevalence of malocclusion. J Dent Educ 49 (1985) 386-396
26. Koochek A.-R., Yeh M.S., Rolfe B., and Richmond S. The relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, and patients' perceptions of malocclusion: a study in general dental practice. Br Dent J 191 (2001) 325-329
27. Roberts C.T., and Richmond S. The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 24 (1997) 139-147
28. Fox N.A., Daniels C., and Gilgrass T. A comparison of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON) with the peer assessment rating (PAR) and the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN). Br Dent J 193 (2002) 225-230