Neural indices of spoken word processing in background multi-talker babble

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 321-333

  Romei, Laurie ^a   Wambacq, Ilse J A ^a   Besing, Joan ^a   Koehnke, Janet ^a   Jerger, James ^b  

^a MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Monolinguals; Semantic processing; Speech processing in noise

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; NOISE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; NOISE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 79953815992     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.547875     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anderson J.E. & Holcomb J.E. 1995. Auditory and visual priming using different stimulus onset asynchronies: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 32, 177-190.
2. Annett M. 1972. The distribution of manual asymmetry. Br J Psychol, 63(3), 343-358.
3. AUDiTEC (n.d.). Multitalker noise (20 talkers) [CD146]. St. Louis, USA: Auditec, Inc.
4. Aydelott J. & Bates E. 2004. Effects of acoustic distortion and semantic context on lexical access. Language Cogn Processes, 19(1), 29-56. (Pubitemid 38239647)
5. Aydelott J., Dick F. & Mills D.L. 2006. Effects of acoustic distortion and semantic context on event-related potentials to spoken words. Psychophysiology, 43,454-464. (Pubitemid 44370048)
6. Bentin S., Kutas M. & Hillyard S.A. 1993. Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 161-169. (Pubitemid 23049782)
7. Bronkhorst A.W. & Plomp R. 1989. Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners, J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 1508-1516.
8. Brualla J., Romero M.F., Serrano M. & Valdizan J.R. 1998. Auditory eventrelated potentials to semantic priming during sleep. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 108,283-290.
9. Chao L.L. & Knight R.T. 1996. Prefrontal and posterior cortical activation during auditory working memory. Cogn Brain Res, 4, 27-37. (Pubitemid 26194522)
10. Chao L.L. & Knight R.T. 1997. Prefrontal deficits in attention and inhibitory control with aging. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 63-69. (Pubitemid 27081872)
11. Chao L.L. & Knight R.T. 1998. Contribution of human prefrontal cortex to delay performance. J Cogn Neurosci, 10(2), 167-177. (Pubitemid 28182188)
12. Chao L.L., Nielsen-Bohlman L. & Knight R.T. 1995. Auditory event-related potentials dissociate early and late memory processes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 157-168.
13. Connolly J.F. & Phillips NA. 1994. Event-related components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. J Cogn Neurosci, 6, 256-266. (Pubitemid 24249586)
14. Connolly J.F., Phillips N.A, Stewart S.H. & Brake W.G. 1992. Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences. Brain Lang, 43, 1-18.
15. Crandall C. & Smaldino J. 2002. Room acoustics and auditory rehabilitation technology. In: J. Katz (ed.) Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 607-630.
16. D'Arcy R.C.N. Service E., Connolly J.F. & Hawco C.S. 2005. The influence of increased working memory load on semantic neural systems: A high-resolution event-related potential study. Cog Brain Res, 22(2), 177-191. (Pubitemid 40093911)
17. Daltrozzo J., Wioland N. & Kotchoubey B. 2005, September. Explicit and implicit mechanisms of semantic priming: ERP effects to masked sentences. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Lisbon, Portugal.
18. Daltrozzo J., Wioland N. & Kotchoubey B. 2007. Sex differences in two event-related potentials components related to semantic priming. Arch Sex Behav, 36(4), 555-568. (Pubitemid 47106399)
19. Deacon D., Mehta A., Tinsley C. & Nousak J.M. 1995. Variation in the latencies and amplitudes of N400 and NA as a function of semantic priming. Psychophysiology, 32,560-570.
20. Dien J. 2010. Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. Psycholphysiology, 47, 170-183.
21. Dien J., Beal DJ. & Berg P. 2005. Optimizing principal component analysis of event-related potentials: Matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations. Clin Neurophysiol, 116 (8), 1808-1825. (Pubitemid 41040049)
22. Fisher A.L., Hymel M.R., Cranford J.L. & DeChicchis A.R 2000. Electrophysiologic signs of auditory distraction in elderly listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 36-45. (Pubitemid 30123395)
23. Hagoort P. & Brown C.M. 2000. ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530. (Pubitemid 30440623)
24. Hannemann R., Obleser J. & Eulitz C. 2007. Top-down knowledge supports the retrieval of lexical information from degraded speech. Brain Res, 1153, 134-143. (Pubitemid 46802526)
25. Helfer K.S. & Wilber L.A. 1990. Hearing loss, age, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. J Speech Hear Res, 33, 149-155. (Pubitemid 20104975)
26. Helfer K.S. & Vargo M. 2009. Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. J Am Acad Audiol, 20(4), 264-271.
27. Holcomb PJ. 1993. Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47-61. (Pubitemid 23027776)
28. Holcomb PJ. & Neville HJ. 1990. Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related potentials. Lang Cogn Proc, 5,281-312.
29. Kayser J., Bruder G., Tenke C., Stuart B., Amador X. et al. 2001. Eventrelated brain potentials (ERPs) in schizophrenia for tonal and phonetic oddball tasks. Biol Psychiatry, 15, 832-847. (Pubitemid 32436388)
30. Kent R 1992. Auditory processing of speech. In: J. Katz, N.A. Stecker & D. Henderson (eds.) Central Auditory Processing: A Transdisciplinary View. St. Louis: Mosby, pp. 93-106.
31. Kotz S.A. 2001. Neurolinguistic evidence for bilingual language representation: A comparison of reaction times and event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Lang Cogn, 4 (2), 143-154.
32. Kotz S.A. & Elston-Guttler K. 2004. The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related brain potentials, J Neurolinguistics, 17, 215-235. (Pubitemid 38063208)
33. Kozou H., Kujala T., Shtyrov Y., Toppila E., Starck J. et al. 2005. The effect of different noise types on the speech and non-speech elicited mismatch negativity. Hear Res, 199, 31-39. (Pubitemid 39582777)
34. Kucera H. & Francis W.N. 1967. Computational analysis of Present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
35. Kutas M. & Federmeier F.D. 2000. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension, Trends Cogn Sci, 4, 463-470.
36. Kutas M. & Hillyard S.A. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205. (Pubitemid 10141432)
37. Kutas M. & Hillyard S.A. 1989. An electrophysiological probe of incidental semantic association. J Cognitive Neurosci, 1(1), 38-49. (Pubitemid 20346082)
38. Martin B., Kurtzberg D. & Stapells D. 1999. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the MMN to speech sounds/ba/and/da/. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 271-286. (Pubitemid 29174432)
39. Martin B.A., Sigal A., Kurtzberg D. & Stapells D.R. 1997. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da/. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 1585-1599. (Pubitemid 27114263)
40. Martin B.A. & Stapells D.R. 2005. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech. Ear Hear, 26(2), 195-213. (Pubitemid 40489329)
41. Martin B.A., Tremblay K.L. & Korczak P. 2008. Speech evoked potentials: From the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear, 29, 285-313. (Pubitemid 351681498)
42. Mattys S.L., Brooks J. & Cooke M. 2009. Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors. Cogn Psych, 59(3), 203-243.
43. McCallum W.C., Farmer S.F. & Pocock P.V. 1984. The effects of semantic and physical incongruities on auditory event related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 59, 477-488. (Pubitemid 15216894)
44. McNamara T.P. 2005. Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition. New York: Psychology Press.
45. Mehta J. 2008. The semantic priming effect across the life-span: An ERP study examining processing negativity. Dissertation Abstract International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 69 (8-B), 4714. (UMI No. AAT 3323625) Retrieved December 10, 2009, from Dissertations and Theses database.
46. Mehta J., Jerger S., Jerger J. & Martin J. 2009. Electrophysiological correlates of word comprehension: Event-related potential (ERP) and independent component analysis (ICA). Intl J Audiol, 48(1), 1-11.
47. Musiek F. & Chermak G. 2007. Handbook of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder: Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis (Vol. I). San Diego: Plural Publishing.
48. Naätanen R 1990. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Beh Brain Sci, 13, 201-288.
49. Nabelek A. & Pickett J. 1974. Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 56, 628-639.
50. Neely J.H. 1977. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. J Exp Psychol G, 106, 226-254.
51. Neely J.H. 1991. Semantic priming effects on visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In: D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (eds.) Basic Processes on Reading: Visual Word Recognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 264-336.
52. Nelson D.L., McEvoy C.L. & Schreiber T.A. 1998. The University of South Florida Word Association, Rhyme and Word Fragment Norms. http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
53. Scott S.K., Rosen S., Wickham L. & Wise RJ.S. 2004. A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and en-ergetic masking effects in speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 115(2), 813-821. (Pubitemid 38200667)
54. Shtyrov Y., Kujala T., Ahveninen J., Tervaniemi M., Alku P. et al. 1998. Back-ground acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: Magnetic mismatch negativity study. Neuroscience Letters, 251, 141-144. (Pubitemid 28358274)
55. th Edition, New York: Lippincott.
56. Steinhauer K. & Connolly J.F. 2008. Event-related potentials in the study of language. In: B. Stemmer & H. Whitaker (eds.), Handbook of the Neuroscience of Language. New York: Elsevier, pp. 91-104.
57. Whiting KA., Martin BA. & Stapells D.R. 1998. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da/. Ear Hear, 19,218-231. (Pubitemid 28285601)
58. Wong P.C.M., Perrachione T.K. & Parrish T.D. 2007. Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults. Hum Brain Mapp, 28, 995-1006. (Pubitemid 47549704)
59. Wong P.C.M., Uppunda A.K., Parrish T.B. & Dha S. 2008. Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41(4), 1026-1039.