The effect of different noise types on the speech and non-speech elicited mismatch negativity

Hearing Research

Volumn 199, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 31-39

  Kozou, H ^a,b   Kujala, T ^a   Shtyrov, Y ^c   Toppila, E ^d   Starck, J ^d   Alku, P ^e   Naatanen R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b ALEXANDRIA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^c MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^d FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

^e AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Event related brain potentials; Mismatch negativity; Noise; Speech

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDUSTRIAL NOISE; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; TRAFFIC NOISE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 9744250944     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. P. Alku, H. Tiitinen, and R. Näätänen A method for generating natural-sounding speech stimuli for cognitive brain research Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 1999 1329 1333
2. E. Amenedo, and C. Escera The accuracy of sound duration representation in the human brain determines the accuracy of behavioural perception Eur. J. Neurosci. 12 2000 2570 2574
3. A. Boothroyd Auditory perception of speech contrasts by persons with sensorineural hearing loss J. Speech Hear. Res. 27 1984 134 144
4. D. Dirks, D. Morgan, and J. Dubno A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition J. Speech Hear. Disord. 47 1982 114 123
5. J. Festen, and R. Plomp Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 1990 1725 1736
6. D.R. Frisina, and R.D. Frisina Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms Hear. Res. 106 1997 95 104
7. D. Garstecki, and A. Mulac Effects of test material and competing message on speech discrimination J. Audit. Res. 3 1974 171 178
8. H. Gustafson, and S. Arlinger Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 1994 518 529
9. J.J. Hawkins, and S. Stevens The masking of pure tones and of speech by wide band noise J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22 1950 6 13
10. C. Herrmann, U. Oertel, Y. Wang, B. Maess, and A. Friederici Noise affects auditory and linguistic processing differently: an MEG study Neuroreport 112 2000 227 229
11. S. Hygge, J. Ronnberg, B. Larsby, and S. Arlinger Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds J. Speech Hear. Res. 35 1992 208 215
12. S. Jerger, R. Elizondo, T. Dinh, P. Sanchez, and E. Chavira Linguistic influences on the auditory processing of speech by children with normal hearing or hearing impairment Ear Hearing 152 1994 138 160
13. T. Kujala, J. Kallio, M. Tervaniemi, and R. Näätänen The mismatch negativity as an index of temporal processing in audition Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 2001 1712 1719
14. S. Levänen, and M. Sams Disrupting human auditory change detection: Chopin is superior to wide band noise Psychophysiology 34 1997 258 265
15. B. Martin, D. Kurtzberg, and D. Stapells The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the MMN to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/ J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 42 1999 271 286
16. A. Muller-Gass, A. Marcoux, J. Logan, and K. Campbell The intensity of masking noise affects the mismatch negativity to speech sounds in human subjects Neurosci. Lett. 299 2001 197 200
17. F.E. Musiek Central auditory tests Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 51 1999 33 46
18. F.E. Musiek, and J.A. Baran Central auditory assessment: thirty years of challenge and change Ear Hearing 84 Suppl 1987 22S 35S
19. F.E. Musiek, N.A. Geurkink, and S.A. Kietel Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children Laryngoscope 923 1982 251 257
20. R. Näätänen The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity MMN and its magnetic equivalent MMNm Psychophysiology 38 2001 1 21
21. R. Näätänen, and K. Alho Mismatch negativity - a unique measure of sensory processing in audition Int. J. Neurosci. 801-804 1995 317 337
22. R. Näätänen, and K. Alho Mismatch negativity - the measure for central sound representation accuracy Audiol. Neuro-otol. 25 1997 341 353
23. S.K. Salo, A.H. Lang, and A.J. Salmivalli Effect of contralateral wide band noise masking on the mismatch negativity Scand. Audiol. 24 1995 165 173
24. R.J. Salvi, A.H. Lockwook, R.D. Frisina, M.L. Coad, D.S. Wack, and D.R. Frisina PET imaging of the normal human auditory system: responses to speech in quiet and in background noise Hear. Res. 170 2002 96 106
25. Y. Shtyrov, T. Kujala, J. Ahveninen, M. Tervaniemi, P. Alku, R.J. Ilmoniemi, and R. Näätänen Background acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: magnetic mismatch negativity study Neurosci. lett. 2512 1998 141 144
26. J. Sperry, T. Wiley, and M. Chial Word recognition performance in various background competitors J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 8 1997 71 80
27. D. Van-Tasell, and J. Yanz Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials J. Speech Hear. Res. 30 1987 377 386
28. M. Wang, and R. Bilger Consonant confusions in noise: A study of perceptual features J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54 1973 1248 1266