Neuroglobin-prion protein interaction: What's the function?

Journal of Peptide Science

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 387-391

  Palladino, Pasquale ^a   Scaglione, Giovanni Luca ^b   Arcovito, Alessandro ^b   Maria Vitale, Rosa ^c   Amodeo, Pietro ^c   Vallone, Beatrice ^d   Brunori, Maurizio ^d   Benedetti, Ettore ^a   Rossi, Filomena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cellular prion protein; Nervous system; Neuroglobin; Peptides synthesis; Surface plasmon resonance

Indexed keywords

NEUROGLOBIN; PRION PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE;

GLOBINS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; PRIONS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE;

EID: 79953785342     PISSN: 10752617     EISSN: 10991387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/psc.1333     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Prusiner SB. Prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998; 95: 13363-13368.
2. Stewart RS, Harris DA. Mutational analysis of topological determinants in prion protein (PrP) and measurement of transmembrane and cytosolic PrP during prion infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 45960-45968.
3. Nieznanski K. Interactions of prion protein with intracellular proteins: so many partners and no consequences? Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2010; 30: 653-656.
4. Lechauve C, Rezaei H, Celier C, Kiger L, Corral-Debrinski M, Noinville S, Chauvierre C, Hamdane D, Pato C, Marden MC. Neuroglobin and prion cellular localization: investigation of a potential interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 2009; 388: 968-977.
5. Giuffrè A, Moschetti T, Vallone B, Brunori M. Is neuroglobin a signal transducer? IUBMB Life 2008; 60: 410-413.
6. Brunori M, Giuffrè A, Nienhaus K, Nienhaus GU, Scandurra FM, Vallone B. Neuroglobin, nitric oxide, and oxygen: functional pathways and conformational changes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005; 102: 8483-8488.
7. Vallone B, Nienhaus K, Matthes A, Brunori M, Nienhaus GU. The structure of carbonmonoxy neuroglobin reveals a heme-sliding mechanism for control of ligand affinity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004; 101: 17351-17356.
8. Burmester T, Hankeln T. What is the function of neuroglobin? J. Exp. Biol. 2009; 212: 1423-1428.
9. Simmerling CL, Darden TA, Merz KM, Stanton RV, Cheng AL, Vincent JJ, Crowley M, Tsui V, Radmer R, Duan Y, Pitera J, Massova I, Seibel GL, Singh UC, Weiner PK, Kollman PA. AMBER 6. University of California: San Francisco, 1999.
10. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM Jr, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995; 117: 5179-5197.
11. Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE III, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE, Luo R, Merz KM, Pearlman DA, Crowley M, Walker RC, Zhang W, Wang B, Hayik S, Roitberg A, Seabra G, Wong KF, Paesani F, Wu X, Brozell S, Tsui V, Gohlke H, Yang L, Tan C, Mongan J, Hornak V, Cui G, Beroza P, Mathews DH, Schafmeister C, Ross WS, Kollman PA. AMBER 9. University of California: San Francisco, 2006.
12. Wang J, Cieplak P, Kollman PA. How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? J. Comput. Chem. 2000; 21: 1049-1074.
13. Tsui V, Case DA. Theory and applications of the generalized born solvation model in macromolecular simulations. Biopolymers (Nucl. Acid. Sci.) 2001; 56: 275-291.
14. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wüthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graph. 1996; 14: 51-55.
15. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998; 19: 1639-1662.
16. Vallone B, Nienhaus K, Brunori M, Nienhaus GU. The structure of murine neuroglobin: novel pathways for ligand migration and binding. Proteins 2004; 56: 85-92.
17. Sanner MF. Python: a programming language for software integration and development. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 1999; 17: 57-61.
18. Ryckaert J-P, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977; 23: 327-341.
19. Osiecka KM, Nieznanska H, Skowronek KJ, Karolczak J, Schneider G, Nieznanski K. Prion protein region 23-32 interacts with tubulin and inhibits microtubule assembly. Proteins 2009; 77: 279-296.
20. Han J, Wang X, Yao H, Gao C, Li F, Zhang B, Jiang H, Dong X. Tau-mediated microtubule formation inhibited by prion protein. Neurosci. Bull. 2005; 21: 398-403.
21. Han J, Zhang J, Yao H, Wang X, Li F, Chen L, Gao C, Gao J, Nie K, Zhou W, Dong X. Study on interaction between microtubule associated protein tau and prion protein. Sci. China C. Life Sci. 2006; 49: 473-479.
22. Wang XF, Dong CF, Zhang J, Wan YZ, Li F, Huang YX, Han L, Shan B, Gao C, Han J, Dong XP. Human tau protein forms complex with PrP and some GSS- and fCJD-related PrP mutants possess stronger binding activities with tau in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2008; 310: 49-55.
23. Lysek DA, Wutrich K. Prion protein interaction with the C-terminal SH3 domain of Grb2 studied using NMR and optical spectroscopy. Biochemistry 2004; 43: 10393-10399.
24. Meggio F, Negro A, Sarno S, Ruzzene M, Bertoli A, Sorgato MC, Pinna LA. Bovine prion protein as a modulator of protein kinase CK2. Biochem. J. 2000; 352: 191-196.
25. Surguchev A, Surguchov A. Conformational diseases: looking into the eyes. Brain Res. Bull. 2009; 81: 12-24.