Preoperative investigations

Modern Management of Endometriosis

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 71-85

  Kinkel, Karen ^a   Brosens, Jan ^b   Brosens, Ivo ^c  

^a Institute of Radiology and Foundation des Grangettes   (Switzerland)

^b HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c LEUVEN INSTITUTE FOR FERTILITY AND EMBRYOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953780335     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Mol BW, Bayram N, Lijmer JG, et al. The performance of CA-125 measurement in the detection of endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 1101-1108.
2. Harada T, Kubota T, Asi T. Usefulness of CA19-9 versus CA125 for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 733-739.
3. Bedaiwy MA, Falcone T, Sharma RK, et al. Prediction of endometriosis with serum and peritoneal fluid markers: a prospective controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 426-431.
4. Somigliana E, Viganò P, Tirelli AS, et al. Use of the concomitant serum dosage of CA 125, CA 19-9 and interleukin-6 to detect the presence of endometriosis. Results from a series of reproductive age women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic conditions. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 1871-1876.
5. Vigano P, Somigliana E, Matrone R, et al. Serum leptin concentrations in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 1085-1087.
6. Brosens IA, Brosens JJ. Redefining endometriosis: is deep endometriosis a progressive disease? Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1-3.
7. Kitawaki J, Kusuki I, Koshiba H, et al. Detection of aromatase cytochrome P-450 in endometrial biopsy specimens as a diagnostic test for endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 6.
8. Dheenadayalu K, Mak I, Gordts S, et al. Aromatase P450 messenger RNA expression in eutopic endometrium is not a specific marker for pelvic endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 825-829.
9. Kao LC, Germeyer A, Tulac S, et al. Expression profiling of endometrium from women with endometriosis reveals candidate genes for disease-based implantation failure and infertility. Endocrinology 2003; 144: 2870-2881.
10. Brosens I. The classification of endometriosis revisited. Lancet 1993; 341: 630.
11. Takahashi K, Okada M, Okada S, et al. Studies on the detection of small endometrial implants by magnetic resonance imaging using a fat saturation technique. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996; 41: 203-206.
12. Sampson JA. Perforating hemorrhagic (chocolate) cysts of the ovary. Arch Surg 1921; 3: 245-323.
13. Hughesdon PE. The structure of endometrial cysts of the ovary. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1957; 44: 481-487.
14. Brosens IA, Puttemans PJ, Deprest J. The endoscopic localization of endometrial implants in the ovarian chocolate cyst. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 1034-1038.
15. Patel MD, Feldstein VA, Chen DC, et al. Endometriomas: diagnostic performance of US. Radiology 1999; 210: 739-745.
16. Moore J, Copley S, Morris J, et al. A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 20: 630-634.
17. Kurjak A, Kupesic S. Scoring system for prediction of ovarian endometriosis based on transvaginal color and pulsed Doppler sonography. Fertil Steril 1994; 62: 81-88.
18. Guerriero S, Mais V, Ajossa S, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography combined with CA-125 plasma levels in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 293-298.
19. Alcazar J L, Laparte C, Jurado M, et al. The role of transvaginal ultrasonography combined with colour velocity imaging and pulsed Doppler in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 487-491.
20. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Mais V, et al. The diagnosis of endometriomas using colour Doppler energy imaging. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1691-1695.
21. Kinkel K, Hricak H, Lu Y, et al. US characterization of ovarian masses: a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 217: 803-811.
22. Zawin M, McCarthy S, Scoutt L, et al. Endometriosis: appearance and detection at MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171: 693-696.
23. Arrivé L, Hricak H, Martin M. Pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171: 687-692.
24. Stratton P, Winkel C, Premkumar A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathologic examination for the detection of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1078-1085.
25. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, et al. Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 180: 73-78.
26. Cullen TS. The distribution of adenomyoma containing uterine mucosa. Arch Surg 1920; 1: 215-283.
27. Itoga T, Matsumoto T, Takeuchi H, et al. Fibrosis and smooth muscle metaplasia in rectovaginal endometriosis. Pathol Int 2003; 53: 371-375.
28. Chapron C, Liaras E, Fayet P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and endometriosis: deeply infiltrating endometriosis does not originate from the rectovaginal septum. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002; 53: 204-208.
29. Bazot M, Thomassin I, Hourani R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for deep pelvic endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 180-185.
30. Kinkel K, Chapron C, Balleyguier C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1080-1086.
31. Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, et al. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology 2004; 232: 379-389.
32. Abrao MS, Neme RM, Averbach M, et al. Rectal endoscopic ultrasound with a radial probe in the assessment of rectovaginal endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004; 11: 50-54.
33. Doniec JM, Kahlke V, Peetz F, et al. Rectal endometriosis: high sensitivity and specificity of endorectal ultrasound with an impact for the operative management. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1667-1673.
34. Koga K, Osuga Y, Momoeda M, et al. Characteristic images of deeply infiltrating rectosigmoid endometriosis on transvaginal and transrectal ultrasonography. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1328-1333.
35. Bazot M, Detchev R, Cortez A, et al. Transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography for the assessment of pelvic endometriosis: a preliminary comparison. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1686-1692.
36. Chapron C, Vieira M, Chopin N, et al. Accuracy of rectal endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectal involvement for patients presenting with deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 175-179.
37. Balleyguier C, Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosing bladder endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002; 9: 15-23.
38. Donnez J, Brosens I. Definition of ureteral endometriosis? Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 178-179.
39. Donnez J, Nisolle M, Squifflet J. Ureteral endometriosis: a complication of rectovaginal endometriotic (adenomyotic) nodules. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 32-37.
40. Brosens I. Endometriosis - a disease because it is characterized by bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 263-267.
41. Deprest J, Marchal G, Brosens I. Obstructive uropathy secondary to endometriosis. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1174-1175.
42. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Sorensen JS, et al. Reproducibility of evaluation of the uterus by transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, hysteroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 195-200.
43. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2001; 76: 588-594.
44. Bazot M, Darai E, Clement de Givry S, et al. Fast breathhold T2-weighted MR imaging reduces interobserver variability in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1291-1296.
45. Soysal S, Soysal ME, Ozer S, et al. The effects of postsurgical administration of goserelin plus anastrozole compared to goserelin alone in patients with severe endometriosis: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 160-167.