The rheumatoid foot: A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Walmsley, Steven ^a   Williams, Anita E ^a   Ravey, Mike ^a   Graham, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953759827     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17571146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-12     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Grondal LB, Tengstrand, Nordmark B, Wretenberg P, Stark A. The foot: still the most important reason for walking incapacity in rheumatoid arthritis: Distribution of symptomatic joints in 1,000 RA patients. Acta Orthopaedica 2008, 79(2):257-261. 10.1080/17453670710015067, 18484253.
2. Otter S, Springett K, Lucas K, Moore A, Horne R, Davies K, Young A. The role of outcome measures in assessing change in the at-risk rheumatoid foot. Jof Tissue Viability 2004, 14(4):137-41.
3. MacSween A, Brydson GJ, Hamilton J. The effect of custom moulded ethyl vinyl acetate foot orthoses on the gait of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The Foot 1999, 9:128-33.
4. Rojas-Villarraga A, Bayona J, Zuluaga N, Mejia S, Hincapie M-E, Anaya JM. The impact of rheumatoid foot on disability in Columbian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009, 10:67. 10.1186/1471-2474-10-67, 2702313, 19527518.
5. Shi K, Tomita T, Hayashida K, Owaki H, Ochi T. Foot deformities in rheumatoid arthritis and relevance of disease severity. J Rheumatol 2000, 27(1):84-9.
6. Williams AE, Nester CJ, Ravey M. A qualitative investigation of rheumatoid arthritis patients' experiences of therapeutic footwear - a qualitative investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007, 8:104. 10.1186/1471-2474-8-104, 2190761, 17976235.
7. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998, 2(14).
8. Fung C, Hays R. Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Quality Life Res 2008, 17(10):1297-1302.
9. Bowling A. Measuring Disease: A Review of Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Scales. 2001, 25-26. Open University Press: Buckingham, 2.
10. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. 2003, 181-187. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 3.
11. Hambleton RK, Jones RW. An NCME instructional module on comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educ Meas 1993, 12(3):38-47.
12. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life. 2007, 161-176. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd: West Sussex, 2.
13. Rothman ML, Beltron P, Cappelleri JC, Lipscomb J, Techendorf B. Patient-reported outcomes: conceptual Issues. Value Health 2007, 10(S2):S66-S75. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00269.x, 17995476.
14. Haywood KL. Patient-reported outcome I: measuring what matters in musculoskeletal care. Musculoskeletal Care 2006, 4(4):187-203. 10.1002/msc.94, 17117444.
15. National Institute for Clinical Excellence Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Adults. 2009, NICE: London, National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
16. Department of Health High Quality Care for All. NHS Next Stage Review Final Report 2008, TSO: London, Department of Health.
17. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007, 37(2):72-84. 10.2519/jospt.2007.2403, 17366962.
18. Van der Leeden M, Steultjens MP, Terwee CB, Rosenbaum D, Turner D, Woodburn J, Dekker J. A systematic review of instruments measuring foot function, foot pain, and foot-related disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2008, 59(9):1257-1269.
19. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Getzsche PC, Ionnidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Mohoer D. The PRISMA statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies that Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Exploration and Elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100, 2707010, 19621070.
20. Lohr KN. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality Life Res 2009, 11(3):193-205.
21. Haywood KL. Patient-reported outcome II: selecting appropriate measures for musculoskeletal care. Musculoskeletal Care 2007, 5(2):72-90. 10.1002/msc.101, 17542045.
22. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. Journal Clin Epidemiol 1991, 44(6):561-70.
23. Fransen M, Edmonds J. Off the Shelf orthopaedic footwear for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1997, 10:250-6. 10.1002/art.1790100406, 9295454.
24. Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality Life Res 2005, 14(5):1225-1237.
25. Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs 2007, 16(2):234-243. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x, 17239058.
26. Soohoo NF, Vyas R, Samimi D. Responsiveness of the Foot Function Index, AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems, and the SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 2006, 27(11):930-934.
27. Landorf KB, Radford JA. Minimal important difference: Values for the Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Index and Visual Analogue Scale. The Foot 2008, 18(1):15-19.
28. Garrow AP, Papageorgiou AC, Silman AJ, Thomas E, Jayson MI, Macfarlane GJ. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess disabling foot pain. Pain 2000, 85(1-2):107-113. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00263-8, 10692609.
29. Helliwell P, Woodburn J, Redmond A, Turner DE, Davys H. The Foot and Ankle in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comprehensive Guide. 2007, Churchill Livingstone: London.
30. Macran S, Kind P, Collingwood J, Hull R, McDonald I, Parkinson L. Evaluating podiatry services: Testing a treatment specific measure of health status. Quality Life Res 2003, 12(2):177-188.
31. Kline P. A Psychometrics Primer. 2000, 53-64. Free Association Books: New York.
32. Barnett S, Campbell R, Harvey I. The Bristol Foot Score: developing a patient-based foot-health measure. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2005, 95(3):264-72.
33. Tully MP, Cantrill JA. Subjective outcome measurement - a primer. Pharmacy World & Science 1999, 21(3):101-109.
34. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1998, 88(9):419-28.
35. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Dunne M. Health related quality of life outcomes following podiatric surgery. J Am Podiat Med Assoc 2001, 91(4):185-173.
36. Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, Rudicel S, Richmond J. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Lower Limb Outcomes Assessment Instruments. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Joint Surgery 2004, 86(5):902-909.
37. Williams AE, Nester CJ. Patient perceptions of stock footwear design features. Prosthet Orthotics Int 2006, 30(1):61-71.
38. Rat AC, Pouchot J, Guillemin F, Baumann M, Retel-Rude N, Spitz E, Coste J. Content of quality-of-life instruments is affected by item-generation methods. Int J Qual Health Care 2007, 19(6):390-398. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm040, 17875543.
39. Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Outcomes Instruments: Normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg 2002, 84(2):208-215.
40. Rowan K. The development and validation of a multi-dimensional measure of chronic foot pain: the Rowan Foot Pain Assessment Questionnaire (ROFPAQ). Foot Ankle Int 2001, 22(10):795-809.
41. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory. Science 1965, 150(699):971-9. 10.1126/science.150.3699.971, 5320816.
42. Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25:628-634. 10.1080/09638280110070221, 12959337.
43. Andre M, Hagelberg S, Stenstrom CH. The juvenile arthritis foot disability index: development and evaluation of measurement properties. J Rheumatol 2004, 31(12):2488-93.
44. World Health Organisation International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 2001, WHO: Geneva, World Health Organisation.
45. Ferrari J. A review of the foot deformities seen in juvenile chronic arthritis. The Foot 1998, 8(4):193-196.
46. Sundbom A, Stenstrom CH. Development of a questionnaire on foot Problems in rheumatoid arthritis [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2003, 62(S1):60.
47. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad K, Stuck R, Matters M. Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index. Foot Ankle Int 2006, 27(7):519-27.
48. Bond TG, Fox C. Applying the Rasch Model - Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 2007, 60-62. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, 2, 76.
49. Martin RL. The Development of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. PhD thesis 2003, University of Pittsburgh, Office of Research, Health Sciences.
50. Stamm T, Machold K. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in practice in rheumatological care and research. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007, 19(2):184-9. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3280148e64, 17278936.
51. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdette RC, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int 2005, 26(11):968-83.
52. Helliwell P, Reay N, Gilworth G, Redmond A, Slade A, Tennant A, Woodburn J. Development of a foot impact scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 53(3):418-422. 10.1002/art.21176, 15934122.
53. Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000, 38(9 Suppl):II28-42. 1815384, 10982088.
54. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1994, 38(1):1-14. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90294-1, 8146699.
55. Bornman J. The World Health Organisation's terminology and classification: application to severe disability. Disabil Rehabil 2004, 26(3):182-8. 10.1080/09638280410001665218, 14754630.
56. Boonen A, Rasker J, Stucki G. The international classification for functioning, disability and health. A challenge and a need for rheumatology. Clin Rheumatol 2007, 26(11):1803-1808. 10.1007/s10067-007-0623-0, 17558464.
57. Conaghan PG, Brooks P. How to manage musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008, 22(3):387-394. 10.1016/j.berh.2008.02.004, 18519094.
58. Podiatric Rheumatic Care Association Standards of Care for People with Musculoskeletal Foot Health Problems. Podiatric Rheumatic Care Association., http://www.prcassoc.org.uk/standards-project
59. Bouysset M, Tourne Y, Tillmann K. Foot and Ankle in Rheumatoid Arthritis. 2005, 112-114. Springer-Verlag: France.
60. Ward MM. Outcome measurement: health status and quality of life. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2004, 16(2):96-101. 10.1097/00002281-200403000-00004, 14770092.
61. Hewlett SA. Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. J Rheumatol 2003, 30(4):877-9.
62. Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey Methodology. 2004, 241-267. Canada: John Wiley and Sons.
63. Dillman DA, Redline CD. Testing paper self-administered questionnaires: Cognitive interview and field-test comparisons. Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires 2004, 299-317. John Wiley and Sons, Inc: Canada, Presser S, Rothgeb JM, Couper MP, Lessler JT, Martin, E, Martin J, Singer E.
64. Cieza A, Stucki G. Understanding functioning, disability, and health in rheumatoid arthritis: the basis for rehabilitation care. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2005, 17(2):183-9. 10.1097/01.bor.0000151405.56769.e4, 15711233.
65. Bilsbury CD, Richman A. A staging approach to measuring patient-centred subjective outcomes. Acta PsychiatrScand 2002, 106:5-40.
66. Joyce CRB, O'Boyle CA, McGee H. Individualised Quality of Life: Approaches to Conceptualisation and Assessment. 1999, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
67. Wettergren L, Kettis-Lindblad T, Sprangers M, Ring L. The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW. Qual Life Res 2009, 18(6):737-746. 10.1007/s11136-009-9490-2, 19496021.
68. Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Leng M, Russell IT, MacDonald LM. A New Approach to the Measurement of Quality of Life: The Patient-Generated Index. Med Care 1994, 32(11):1109-1126. 10.1097/00005650-199411000-00004, 7967852.
69. Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Grace E, Hanna B. The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire - An individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987, 14(3):446-451.