The Bristol foot score: Developing a patient-based foot-health measure

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 264-272

  Barnett, Sue ^a   Campbell, Rona ^b   Harvey, Ian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NAIL; PODIATRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF EVALUATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOE;

EID: 20444401233     PISSN: 87507315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7547/0950264     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. NETTLETON S: "The Sociology of the Body," in The Sociology of Health and Illness, ed by S Nettleton, p 100, Blackwell, Oxford, 1995.
2. BRODIE BA, REES CL, ROBINS DJ, ET AL: Wessex feet: a regional foot health survey. The Chiropodist 43: 152, 1988.
3. STEVENS G: Feet first: the report of the joint Department of Health and NHS Chiropody task force. J Br Podiatr Med 49: 210, 1994.
4. GRAHAM P: Feet first: the future of NHS podiatry services. Podiatry Now 2: 389, 1999.
5. PUSHPANGADAN M, BURNS E: Caring for older people: community services: health. BMJ 313: 805, 1996.
6. HARVEY I, FRANKEL S, MARKS R, ET AL: Foot morbidity and exposure to chiropody: a population based study. BMJ 315: 1054, 1997.
7. KING'S FUND WORKSHOP: Research and Development: The Podiatry Agenda, King's Fund Publications, London, 1995.
8. CANT F: Patient assessment and episode of care. Br J Podiatry 2: 3, 1999.
9. CHAMBERS P: A case for qualitative research in podiatry. Br J Podiatry 3: 3, 2000.
10. BUDIMAN-MAK E, CONRAD KJ, ROACH KE: The Foot Function Index: a measure of pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol 44: 561, 1991.
11. BENNETT PJ, PATTERSON C, WEARING S, ET AL: Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. JAPMA 88: 419, 1998.
12. BOWLING A: Measuring Disease, Open University Press, Buckingham, England, 1996.
13. ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING (ED): Nursing Care of Older Patients from Black and Minority Ethnic Communities, Royal College of Nursing, London, 1998.
14. POPE C, ZEIBLAND S, MAYS M: Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 320: 114, 2000.
15. BLAND JM, ALTMAN DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307, 1986.
16. UNITED BRISTOL HEALTHCARE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE TRUST: Chiropody Assessment Criteria Score, United Bristol Healthcare National Health Service Trust, Bristol, England, 1996.
17. LIKERT R: A technique for the development of attitude scales. Educ Psychol Measure 12: 313, 1952.
18. DE VAUS DA: "The Process of Analysis: Initial Analysis," in Surveys in Social Research, 4th Ed, p 285, UCL Press Ltd, London, 1996.
19. LITTLE P, EVERITT H, WILLIAMSON I, ET AL: Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ 322: 468, 2001.
20. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (ED): National Service Framework for Older People, Department of Health, London, 2001.
21. REGAN D, SMITH J: The Fullness of Time, Counsel and Care, London, 1997.
22. GARROW AP, PAPAGGEORGIOU AC, SILMAN AJ, ET AL: Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess disabling foot pain. Pain 85: 107, 2000.
23. STUCK AF, SIU AL, WIELAND GD, ET AL: Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342: 1032, 1993.
24. FLETCHER A: Multidimensional assessment of elderly people in the community. Br Med Bull 54: 945, 1998.