The relative influences of land-owner and landscape heterogeneity in an agent-based model of land-use

Ecological Economics

Volumn 70, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1075-1087

  Kelley, Hugh ^a   Evans, Tom ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based; Land use; Portfolio theory; Spatial

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HETEROGENEITY; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDOWNERSHIP; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY APPROACH; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

INDIANA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79953739382     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ahn C., Singh I., Squire L. A model of an agricultural household in a multi-crop economy: the case of Korea. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1981, 63(4):520-525.
2. Anselin L. Spatial effects in econometric practice in environmental and resource economics. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83(3):705-710.
3. Balmann A. Farm based modeling of regional structural change: a cellular automata approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics 1997, 24.
4. Barbier E. The economics of tropical deforestation and land use: an introduction to the special issue. Land Economics 2001, 77(2):155-171.
5. Baskent E. Controlling spatial structure of forested landscapes: a case study toward landscape management. Landscape Ecology 1999, 14(1):83-97.
6. Benjamin D. Household composition, labor markets, and labor demand: testing for separation in agricultural household models. Econometrica 1992, 60(2):287-322.
7. Blank S. Producers get squeezed up the farming food chain: a theory of crop portfolio composition and land use. Review of Agricultural Economics 2001, 23(2).
8. Berliant M., Fujita M. Alonso's discrete population model of land use: efficient allocations and competitive equilibria. International Economic Review 1992, 33(3):535-566.
9. Deaton A., Laroque G. On the behavior of commodity prices. Review of Economic Studies 1992, 59.
10. Deller S., Tsai T., Marcouiller D., English D. The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83(2):352-365.
11. DeLong J., Shleifer A., Summers L., Waldmann R. Noise traders and risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economic 1990, 98:703-738.
12. Etienne M., LePage C., Cohen M. A step-by-step approach to building land management scenarios based on multiple viewpoints on multi-agent system simulations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2003, 6(2).
13. Evans T., Green G., Carlson L. Multi-scale analysis of land cover composition and landscape management of public and private lands in Indiana. GIS and Remote Sensing Applications in Biogeography and Ecology 2001, Kluwer Academic Pub, Boston, MA. A. Millington, S. Walsh, P. Osborne (Eds.).
14. Evans T., Kelley H. Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of land cover change. Journal of Environmental Management 2004, 72:1-2.
15. Faustmann M. Berechnung des Werthes, welchen Waldboden, sowie noch nicht haubare Waldbestaende fuer die Waldwirtschaft besitzen. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung 1849, 25:441-455. (December 1849).
16. Finnoff D., Tschirhart J. Protecting an endangered species while harvesting its prey in a general equilibrium ecosystem model. Land Economics 2003, 79(2):160-180.
17. Granger C., Newbold P. Forecasting Economic Time Series 1986, Academic Press, San Diego. Second edition.
18. Hosier R. The economics of deforestation in Eastern Africa. Economic Geography 1988, 64(2):121-136.
19. Inman K., McLeod D., Menkhaus D. Rural land use and sale preferences in a Wyoming county. Land Economics 2002, 78(1):72-87.
20. Irwin E. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics 2002, 78(4):465-480.
21. Irwin E., Bockstael N. The problem of identifying land use spillovers: measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83(3):698-704.
22. Lal R. Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environment International 2003, 29:4.
23. Lansing J., Kremer J. Emergent properties of Balinese water temple networks: co-adaptation on a rugged fitness landscape. Artificial Life III 1994, Addison-Wesley. C. Langton (Ed.).
24. McGarigal K., Cushman S. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications 2002, 12:335-345.
25. Marshall E. Open space amenities, interacting agents, and equilibrium landscape structure. Land Economics 2004, 80(2):272-293.
26. Mathevet R., Bousquet F., LePage C., Antona M. Agent based simulations of interactions between duck population, farming decisions and leasing of hunting rights in Camargue (Southern France). Ecological Modeling 2003, 165:107-126.
27. Mokma D.J., Sietz M.A. Effects of soil erosion on corn yields on Marlette soils in South-central Michigan. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1992, 47(4):325-327.
28. Morton F., Podolny J. Love or money? The effects of owner motivation in the California wine industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics 2002, 50(4):431-456.
29. Nelson G., Hellerstein D. Do roads cause deforestation? Using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1997, 79(1):80-88.
30. Parks P. Explaining 'irrational' land-use: risk aversion and marginal agricultural land. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 28:34-47.
31. Plantinga A. The effect of agricultural policies on land use and environmental quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1996, 78(4):1082-1091.
32. Puu T. Advances in Spatial Science: Mathematical Location and Land-use Theory: an Introduction 1997, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
33. Rashford B., Lewis D., Evonuk R., Weber B. Economic Interrelationships in a Small Farming Area: Towards an Estimate of the Threshold of Agricultural Production for Sustainable Faring 2003, Unpublished manuscript, Corvallis, OR.
34. Robinson E., Williams J., Albers H. The influence of markets and policy on spatial patterns of non-timber forest product extraction. Land Economics 2002, 78(2):260-271.
35. Spies T., Ripple W., Bradshaw G. Dynamics and pattern of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecological Applications 1994, 4:555-568.
36. Stavins R., Jaffe A. Unintended impacts of public investments of private decisions: the depletion of forested wetlands. The American Economic Review 1990, 80(3):337-352.
37. Stavins R. The costs of carbon sequestration: a revealed-preference approach. The American Economic Review 1999, 89(4):994-1009.
38. Turner M., Wear D., Flamm R. Land ownership and land-cover change in the Southern Appalachian highlands and the Olympic peninsula. Ecological Applications 1996, 6(4):1150-1172.
39. Wear D., Flamm R. Public and private disturbance regimes in the Southern Appalachians. Natural Resource Modeling 1993, 7:379-397.
40. Wu J., Adams R., Plantinga A. Amenities in an urban equilibrium model: residential development in Portland, Oregon. Land Economics 2004, 80(1):19-32.