Agent-based simulations of interactions between duck population, farming decisions and leasing of hunting rights in the Camargue (Southern France)

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 165, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 107-126

  Mathevet, Raphaël ^a   Bousquet, François ^b   Le Page, Christophe ^c   Antona, Martine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MOULIN LYON 3   (France)

^b IRRI   (Thailand)

^c CIRAD   (France)

Author keywords

Agent based simulation; Camargue; Hunting; Land use changes; Rice farming; Waterbirds; Wetland

Indexed keywords

AVIFAUNA; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; HUNTING; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATERFOWL;

CAMARGUE; FRANCE; PROVENCE-ALPES-COTE D'AZUR;

ANAS SP.; AVES;

EID: 0038082322     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00098-X     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abott, C.A., Berry, M.W., 1995. Computational models of white tailed dear in the Florida everglades. UTK-CS. http://www.es.utk.edu/~berry/deer/deer.html.
2. Anderies, J.M., 2000. On modeling human behavior and institutions in simple ecological economic systems. Ecol. Econ. 35, 393-412.
3. Ball, G.L., 1994. Ecosystem modeling with GIS. Environ. Manage. 18 (3), 345-349.
4. Barbier, J.M., Mouret, J.C., 1992. Le riz et la Camargue. Histoire et Recherche. INRA Mensuel 64/65, 39-51.
5. Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F., 2000. SHADOC: a multi-agent model to tackle viability of irrigated systems. Ann. Operations Res. 94, 139-162.
6. Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F., Attonaty, J.-M., 2001. Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal River Valley irrigated systems. J. Artif. Societies Soc. Simulation 4 (2) http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/2/5.html.
7. Beedell, J., Rehman, T., 2000. Using social-psychology models to understand farmers' conservation behaviour. J. Rural Stud. 16, 117-127.
8. Benoit, M., Chicoisne, G., Deffontaines, J.-P., Herve, D., Lardon, S., Le Ber, F., Mullon, C., Papy, F., Souchere, V., Thinon, P., Tichit, M., Treuil, J.-P., 1998. Coordonner des choix de cultures sous contraintes environnementales: des jeux de rôles aux modèles multi-agents. In: Ferrand, N. (Ed.), Actes du Colloque SMAGET. Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 279-292.
9. Blandin, P., Lamotte, M., 1988. Recherche d'une entité écologique correspondant à l'étude des paysages: la notion d'écocomplexe. Bulletin d'Ecologie 19 (4), 547-555.
10. Bossel, H., 2000. Policy assessment and simulation of actor orientation for sustainable development. Ecol. Econ. 35, 337-355.
11. Bousquet, F., Cambier, C., Mullon, C., Morand, P., Quensiere, J., Pavé, A., 1993. Simulating the interaction between a society and a renewable resource. J. Biol. Syst. 1, 199-213.
12. Bousquet, F., Cambier, C., Morand, P., 1994. Distributed artificial intelligence and object-oriented modelling of a fishery. Math. Comput. Model. 20 (8), 97-107.
13. Bousquet, F., Bakam, I., Proton, H., Lepage, C., 1998. Cormas: common-pool resources and multi-agent systems. Lect. Notes Artif. Intelligence 1416, 826-837.
14. Bousquet, F., Barreteau, O., Le Page, C., Mullon, C., Weber, J., 1999. An environmental modelling approach. The use of multi-agents simulations. In: Blasco, F., Weill, A. (Eds.), Advances in Environmental and Ecological Modelling. Elsevier, Paris, pp. 113-122.
15. Bousquet, F., LePage, C., Bakam, I., Takforyan, A., 2001. Multi-agent simulations of hunting wild meat in a village in eastern Cameroon. Ecol. Model. 138, 331-346.
16. Bura, S., Guérin-Pace, F., Mathian, H., Pumain, D., Sanders, L., 1993. Multi-agent systems and the dynamics of a settlement system. In: Artificial Societies. UCL Press, Siena.
17. Chauvelon, P., 1998. A wetland managed for agriculture as an interface between the Rhône river and the Vaccarès lagoon (Camargue, France): transfers of water and nutrients. Hydrobiologia 373/374, 181-191.
18. Costa, M.I.S., Kaszkurewicz, E., Bhaya, A., Hsu, L., 2000. Achieving global convergence to an equilibrium population in predator-prey systems by the use of a discontinuous harvesting policy. Ecol. Model. 128, 89-99.
19. Costanza, R., Daly, H.E., Bartholomey, J.A., 1991. Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics. In: Costanza, R. (Ed.), Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 1-20.
20. Dean, J., Gumerman, G., Epstein, J., Axtell, R., Swedlund, A., Parker, M., 2000. Understanding Anasazi culture change through agent-based modeling. In: Kohler, T., Gumerman, G. (Eds.), Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 179-206.
21. Dehorter, O., Tamisier, A., 1996. Wetland habitat characteristics for waterfowl wintering in Camargue, Southern France: implications for conservation. Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie) 5, 161-172.
22. Ferber, J., 1995. Les systèmes multi-agents. Vers une intelligences collectives, Paris, Inter Editions.
23. Ferrand, N., Deffuant, G., 1999. Aide à la gestion des conflits en aménagement du territoire. Approche multi-agents et modèles cognitifs des acteurs, Cemagref Lisc, Clermont-Ferrand.
24. Franc, A., Sanders, L., 1998. Modèles et systèmes multi-agents en écologie et en géographie; état de l'art et comparaison avec les approches classiques. In: Ferrand, N. (Ed.), Actes du Colloque SMAGET. Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 17-34.
25. Gilbert, N., 1998. The simulation of social processes. In: Ferrand, N. (Ed.), Actes du Colloque SMAGET. Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 121-135.
26. Ginot, V., Le Page, C., Souissi, S., 2002. A multi-agents architecture to enhance end-user individual-based modelling. Ecol. Model. 157, 23-41.
27. Grimm, V., 1999. Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what we have learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecol. Model. 115, 129-148.
28. Grossmann, W.D., 1994. Socio-economic ecological models: criteria for evaluation of state-of-the-art models shown on four case studies. Ecol. Model. 75/76, 21-36.
29. Hardin, G., 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243-1248.
30. Heath, M.F., Evans, M.I., 2000. Important bird areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation. In: Southern Europe, vol. 2. Birdlife International Conservation Series No. 8, Cambridge, UK.
31. Jensen, A.L., 2002. Analysis of harvest and effort data for wild populations in fluctuating environments. Ecol. Model. 157, 43-49.
32. Jodelet, D., 1989. Les Représentations Sociales. PUF, Paris.
33. Kohler, T., Kresl, J., Van West, C., Carr, E., Wilhusen, R., 2000. Be there and then: a modeling approach to settlement determinants and spatial efficiency among late ancestral pueblo populations of the Mesa Verde region, US Southwest. In: Kohler, T., Gumerman, G. (Eds.), Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 145-178.
34. Kokko, H., Lindström, J., 1998. Seasonal density dependence, timing of mortality, and sustainable harvesting. Ecol. Model. 110, 293-304.
35. Lardon, S., Baron, C., Bommel, P., Bousquet, F., Le Page, C., Lifran, R., Monestiez, P., Reitz, P., 1998. Modéliser les configurations et les stratégies spatiales dans un système multi-agents pour la maîtrise de dynamiques d'embroussaillement. In: Ferrand, N. (Ed.), Acres du Colloque SMAGET. Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 169-185.
36. Lynam, T., Bousquet, F., D'Aquino, P., Barreteau, O., Le Page, C., Chinembiri, F., Mombeshora, B., 2002. Adapting science to adaptive managers. Conservation Ecol. 5 (2), 24 http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art24.
37. Madsen, J., Fox, A.D., 1995. Impacts of hunting disturbance on waterbirds - a review. Wildl. Biol. 1-4, 193-207.
38. Mathevet, R., 2000. Les usages des zones humides camarguaises: enjeux et dynamique des interactions environnement/usagers/territoire. Ph.D. thesis, Université J. Moulin Lyon 3.
39. Mathevet, R., Mesléard, F., 2002. The origins and functioning of the private wildfowling lease system in a major Mediterranean wetland: the Camargue (Rhone River delta, Southern France). In: Land Use Policy 19 (4) 277-286.
40. Mathevet, R., Tamisier, A., 2002. Creation of a nature reserve, its effects on hunting management and waterfowl distribution in the Camargue (Southern France). Biodivers. Conservation 11, 209-519.
41. Mathevet, R., Mouret, J.-C., Mesléard, F., 2002. Du mondial au local: originalité et dépendances de la riziculture camarguaise. Faire-Savoirs 2, 49-56.
42. McDonnel, M., Pickett, S.T.A., 1993. Humans as Components of Ecosystems. The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas. Springer-Verlag, New York.
43. Odum, H., 1982. Systems Ecology. Wiley, New York.
44. Pirot, J.Y., 1982. Exploitation alimentaire des zones humides de Camargue par cinq espèces de canards de surface en hivernage et en transit. CNRS Centre d'Ecologie de Camargue, ONC. Rapport d'activité no. 4, Arles.
45. Pirot, J.Y., Chessel, D., Tamisier, A., 1984. Exploitation alimentaire des zones humides de Camargue par cinq espèces de canards de surface en hivernage et en transit. Modélisation spatio-temporelle. Rev. Ecol. (Terre et Vie) 39, 167-192.
46. Phong Chau, N., 2000. Destabilising effect of periodic harvest on population dynamics. Ecol. Model. 127, 1-9.
47. Tamisier, A., Dehorter, O., 1999. Camargue, canards et foulques. Fonctionnement et devenir d'un prestigieux quarrier d'hiver. CoGard, Nîmes.
48. Tamisier, A., Grillas, P., 1994. A review of habitat changes in the Camargue: an assessment of the effect of the loss of biological diversity on the wintering waterfowl community. Biol. Conservation 70, 39-47.
49. Turner, R.K., 1991. Economics and wetland management. Ambio 20 (2), 59-63.
50. Turner, M.G., Wu, Y., Romme, W.H., Wallace, L.L., 1993. A landscape simulation model of winter foraging by large ungulates. Ecol. Model. 69, 163-184.
51. Ulanowicz, R.E., 1997. Ecology: The Ascendant Perspective. Columbia University Press, New York.
52. Williams, C.E., Lathbury, M.E., 1996. Economic incentives for habitat conservation to the Inland Pacific Northwest. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 24 (2), 187-191.
53. Zunga, Q., Vagnini, A., Le Page, C., Toure, I., Lieurain, E., Bousquet, F., 1998. Coupler systèmes d'information géographique et systèmes multi-agents pour modéliser les dynamiques de transformation des paysages. In: Ferrand, N. (Ed.), Actes du Colloque SMAGET. Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 193-206.