Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: A phantom study;Valutazione della restenosi intrastent delle arterie coronarie con tecnica ECG-sincronizzata prospettiva vs retrospettiva: Studio su fantoccio

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 189-196

  Yang, W J ^a   Pan, Z L ^a   Zhang, H ^a   Pang, L F ^a   Guo, Y ^b   Chen, K M ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GE HEALTHCARE   (China)

Author keywords

Coronary artery; CTA; Stent

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RESTENOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFACTS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79953720562     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0599-8     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Morice MC, Colombo A, Meire B, et al (2006) Sirolimus- vs. paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 295:895-904
2. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al (1994) A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 331:496-501 (Pubitemid 24256752)
3. Maffei E , Palumbo A, Martin C et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data and review of multicentre trials. Radiol Med. Dec 16. [Epub ahead of print]
4. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al (2007) Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stents implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology 245:416-423 (Pubitemid 47612522)
5. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery restenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70:564-571
6. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O,et al (2008). Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 29(2):191-197
7. Horiguchi J, Kiguchi M, Fujioka C et al (2008) Radiation dose, image quality, restenosis measurement, and CT densitometry using ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography. A Phantom Study AJR 190:315-320 (Pubitemid 351196600)
8. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C (2008). Prospective electrocardiographytriggered versus retrospective electrocardiography-gated 64-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality, stenoses assessment and radiation dose. Radiology 248:424-430
9. Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Yamamoto H, Kitagawa T, Kohno S, Ito K (2009) Prospective ECG-triggered axial CT at 140-kV tube voltage improves coronary in-stent restenosis visibility at a lower radiation dose compared with conventional retrospective ECG-gated helical CT. Eur Radiol 19:2363-2372
10. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kuwahara S, Mehta D, Kaminaga T, Miyazawa A, Ueno Y, Konno K (2009) . Coronary artery stent evaluation using a vascular model at 64-detector row CT: comparison between prospective and retrospective ECG-gated axial scans. Korean J Radiol 10:217-226
11. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, Flohr T, Rink M, Sommer T, Ozgün M, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818-826 (Pubitemid 43380241)
12. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kaminaga T, Yamauchi T, Kuwahara S,Yokoyama N, et al (2005) Evaluation of coronary stents in vitro with CT angiography: effect of stent diameter, convolution kernel,and vessel orientation to the zaxis. Circ J 69:1124-1131 (Pubitemid 41603103)
13. Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL; Fleischner Society (2003). Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 228:15-21 (Pubitemid 36736063)
14. Wykrzykowska JJ, Arbab-Zadeh A, Godoy G (2010) Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:85-92
15. Sarwar A, Rieber J, Mooyaart EA, Seneviratne SK, Houser SL, Bamberg F, Raffel OC, Gupta R, Kalra MK, Pien H, Lee H, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U (2009). Calcified plaque: measurement of area at thin-section flat-panel CT and 64-section multidetector CT and comparison with histopathologic findings. Radiology 249: 301-306
16. Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL,Jennings RS, McCulloch CC, Hsieh J, Londt JH (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742-753
17. Haraldsdottir S, Gudnason T, Sigurdsson AF, Gudjonsdottir J, Lehman SJ, Eyjolfsson K, Scheving SS, Gibson CM, Hoffmann U, Jonsdottir B, Andersen K (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of instent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population. Eur J Radiol. Jun [Epub ahead of print]
18. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, Granatelli A, Napoli A, Kirchin MA, et al. (2008) Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol 18:234-243 (Pubitemid 351234043)