Edge versus center: Finding common ground in the capitalization debate

Journal of Urban Economics

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 524-541

  Brasington, David M ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capitalization; Crime; Education; House price hedonic; Local public goods; Taxes

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036874290     PISSN: 00941190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00532-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. American Chamber of Commerce Researchers Association (ACCRA), Cost of Living Index 24 (1991) 1.7-1.8.
2. Amerestate, PaceNet Data Set, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.
3. D.M. Brasington, The demand for local public goods: The case of public school quality, Public Finance Review 30 (2002) 163-187.
4. D.M. Brasington, Capitalization and community size, Journal of Urban Economics 50 (2001) 385-395.
5. D.M. Brasington, Demand and supply of public school quality in metropolitan areas: The role of private schools, Journal of Regional Science 40 (2000) 583-605.
6. D.M. Brasington, Which measures of school quality does the housing market value?, Journal of Real Estate Research 18 (1999) 395-413.
7. J.K. Brueckner, A test for allocative efficiency in the local public sector, Journal of Public Economics 19 (1982) 311-331.
8. D.E. Clark, J.C. Cosgrove, Hedonic prices, identification, and the demand for public safety, Journal of Regional Science 30 (1990) 105-121.
9. C.A.M. de Bartolome, S.L. Ross, Comparison of urban equilibria: The conflict between efficiency and equity in the choice of the central city's majority, Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Colorado, 2000.
10. C.A.M. de Bartolome, S.L. Ross, A two community local public service economy in a monocentric urban model, Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Connecticut, 2000.
11. S.C. Deller, An application of a test for allocative efficiency in the local public sector, Regional Science and Urban Economics 20 (1990) 395-406.
12. F. Des Rosiers, M. Theriault, Rental amenities and the stability of hedonic prices: A comparative analysis of five market segments, Journal of Real Estate Research 12 (1996) 17-36.
13. M. Edel, E. Sclar, Taxes, spending, and property values: Supply adjustment in a Tiebout-Oates model, Journal of Political Economy 82 (1974) 941-954.
14. D. Epple, A. Zelenitz, The implications of competition among jurisdictions: Does Tiebout need politics?, Journal of Political Economy 89 (1981) 1197-1217.
15. S. Garasky, D.R. Haurin, Tiebout revisited: Redrawing jurisdictional boundaries, Journal of Urban Economics 42 (1997) 366-376.
16. T. Gayer, Neighborhood demographics and the distribution of hazardous waste risks: An instrumental variables estimation, Working paper, UC-Berkeley and Georgetown University, 2000.
17. A.C. Goodman, T.G. Thibodeau, Housing market segmentation, Journal of Housing Economics 7 (1998) 121-143.
18. T.J. Gronberg, The interaction of markets in housing and local public goods: A simultaneous equations approach, Southern Economic Journal 46 (1979) 445-459.
19. B.W. Hamilton, Capitalization of intrajurisdictional differences in local tax prices, American Economic Review 66 (1976) 743-753.
20. A.F. Haughwout, Central city infrastructure investment and suburban house values, Regional Science and Urban Economics 27 (1997) 199-215.
21. D.R. Haurin, D.M. Brasington, The impact of school quality on real house prices: Interjurisdictional effects, Journal of Housing Economics 5 (1996) 351-368.
22. J.V. Henderson, The Tiebout model: Bring back the entrepreneurs, Journal of Political Economy 93 (1985) 248-264.
23. J.V. Henderson, Community development: The effects of growth and uncertainty, American Economic Review 70 (1980) 894-910.
24. J.V. Henderson, J.-F. Thisse, On strategic community development, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion paper Series No. 1550, 1997.
25. C.A.L. Hilber, C.J, Mayer, Land supply, house price capitalization, and local spending on schools, Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, 2002.
26. W.H. Hoyt, Leviathan, local government expenditures, and capitalization, Regional Science and Urban Economics 29 (1999) 155-171.
27. W.H. Hoyt, Local government inefficiency and the Tiebout hypothesis: Does competition among municipalities limit government inefficiency?, Southern Economic Journal 57 (1990) 481-496.
28. D.N. Hyman, E.C. Pasour Jr., Property tax differentials and residential rents in North Carolina, National Tax Journal 26 (1973) 303-307.
29. D.N. Hyman, E.C. Pasour Jr., Real property taxes, local public services, and residential property values, Southern Economic Journal 39 (1973) 601-611.
30. J.Y. Man, M.S. Rosentraub, Tax increment financing: Municipal adoption and effects on property value growth, Public Finance Review 26 (1998) 523-547.
31. G. Meen, M. Andrew, Housing market choice and unemployment: Empirical evidence for London and the south east, University of Reading, Department of Economics, Discussion paper No. 139, Volume XII, 1999/2000.
32. MESA Group, School District Data Book, National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education, Washington, DC, 1994.
33. W.E. Oates, The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: An empirical study oftax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis, Journal of Political Economy 77 (1969) 957-971.
34. Office of Criminal Justice Services of the State of Ohio, Crime by County 1993, Columbus, OH, 1994.
35. Ohio Department of Education, Division of Information Management Services, http://www.ode.gov/www.ims/vital_reports.html, 1995.
36. L.L. Orr, The incidence of differential property taxes on urban housing, National Tax Journal 21 (1968) 253-262.
37. R.K. Pace, Total grid estimation, Journal of Real Estate Research 15 (1998) 101-114.
38. R.K. Pace, Performing large spatial regressions and autoregressions, Economics Letters 54 (1997) 283-291.
39. S.L. Ross, J. Yinger, Sorting and voting: A review of the literature on urban public finance, in: P. Cheshire, E.S. Mills (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999.
40. D. Savageau, R. Boyer, Places Rated Almanac: Your Guide to Finding the Best Places to Live in North America, Prentice Hall Travel, New York, 1993.
41. W.C. Wheaton, Land capitalization, Tiebout mobility, and the role of zoning regulations, Journal of Urban Economics 34 (1993) 102-117.
42. J. Yinger, Capitalization and sorting: A revision, Public Finance Quarterly 23 (1995) 217-225.
43. J. Yinger, Capitalization and the theory of local public finance, Journal of Political Economy 90 (1982) 917-943.
44. J. Yinger, H.S. Bloom, A. Borsch-Supan, H.F. Ladd, Property Taxes and House Values, Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1988.