A mixed index approach to identifying hedonic price models

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 271-284

  Brasington, David M ^a,b   Hite, Diane ^c  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capitalization; Environmental quality; House price hedonic; Identification; School quality

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; HOUSING MARKET; NUMERICAL MODEL; PRICE DYNAMICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 43049168646     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bartik T.J. The estimation of demand parameters in hedonic pricing models. Journal of Political Economics 95 1 (1987) 81-88
2. Bayer P., McMillan R., and Rueben K. Residential segregation in general equilibrium. NBER Working Paper No. 11095 (2005)
3. Beron K., Murdoch J., and Thayer M. The benefits of visibility improvement: new evidence from the Los Angeles metropolitan Area. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 2-3 (2001) 319-337
4. Black S.E. Do schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 2 (1999) 577-599
5. Bowden R.J. Competitive selection and market data: the mixed-index problem. The Review of Economic Studies 59 3 (1992) 625-633
6. Brasington D.M., and Hite D. Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33 1 (2005) 57-82
7. Brasington D.M., and Haurin D.R. Educational outcomes and house values: a test of the value-added approach. Journal of Regional Science 46 2 (2006) 245-268
8. Brown J.N., and Rosen H.S. On estimation of structural hedonic price models. Econometrica 50 (1982) 765-768
9. Clapp J.M., Nanda A., and Ross S.L. Which school attributes matter?. The Influence of School District Performance and Demographic Composition on Property Values, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, Working paper: 2005-26 (2005)
10. Cushing B.J. Capitalization of interjurisdictional fiscal differentials: an alternative approach. Journal of Urban Economics 15 3 (1984) 317-326
11. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., and Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 39 (1977) 1-38
12. Downes T.A., and Zabel J.E. The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987-1991. Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2002) 1-25
13. Epple D. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: estimating demand and supply functions for differentiated products. Journal of Political Economics 95 1 (1987) 59-80
14. Epple D., and Sieg H. Estimating equilibrium models of local jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy 107 4 (1999) 645-681
15. Figlio D.N., and Lucas M.E. What's in a grade? School report cards and the housing market. American Economic Review 94 (2004) 591-604
16. Gill H.L. Changes in city and suburban house prices during a period of expected school desegregation. Southern Economic Journal 50 1 (1983) 169-184
17. Hite D. Out of market transactions as neighborhood quality indicators in hedonic house price models. Working paper, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University (2006)
18. Hite D., Hoehn J.P., and Randall A. Dealing with health concerns in natural resource damage assessment. Selected Paper, 1999 Annual American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, August, 1999, Nashville, TN; Published Abstract. American Journal of Agricultural Economics vol. 81(5) (1999) 1318 December 1999
19. Hite D., Chern W., Hitzhusen F., and Randall A. Property value impacts of an environmental disamenity: the case of landfills. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2001) 185-202
20. Holt D., Smith T.M.F., and Winter P.D. Regression analysis of data from complex surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A 143 (1980) 474-487
21. Kim C.W., Phipps T.T., and Anselin L. Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 1 (2003) 24-39
22. McMillen D.P. Testing for monocentricity. In: Arnott R.J., and McMillen D.P. (Eds). A Companion to Urban Economics (2006), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
23. Nelson A.C., Genereux J., and Genereux M. Price effects of landfills on house values. Land Economics 68 4 (1992) 359-365
24. Pace R.K., Barry R., and Sirmans C.F. Spatial statistics and real estate. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 17 1 (1998) 5-13
25. Reid G. The many faces of Tiebout bias in local education demand parameter estimates. Journal of Urban Economics 27 2 (1990) 232-254
26. Ries J., and Somerville T. School quality and residential property values: evidence from Vancouver rezoning. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of British Columbia (2004)
27. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economics 82 (1974) 34-55
28. Tiebout C. A pure theory of local public expenditure. Journal of Political Economy 64 (1956) 416-424
29. Wang J., and Zivot E. Inference on structural parameters in instrumental variable regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 66 6 (1998) 1389-1404