Justification of point electrode models in electrical impedance tomography

Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1395-1413

  Hanke, Martin ^a   Harrach, Bastian ^b   Hyvönen, Nuutti ^c  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

complete electrode model; Electric impedance tomography; elliptic boundary value problems; localized current sources; point electrode model

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC LIMITS; COMPLETE ELECTRODE MODEL; CONTACT IMPEDANCE; ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE SHAPE; ELECTRODE SIZE; ELLIPTIC BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM; LOCALIZED CURRENT; PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION; POINT ELECTRODES; POINT SOURCES; RECONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS;

DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; ELECTRIC CONTACTS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTRODES;

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 79953664769     PISSN: 02182025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218202511005362     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. D. C. Barber and B. H. Brown, Applied potential tomography, J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 17 (1984) 723-733.
2. R. H. Bayford, Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography), Annu. Rev. Biomed. Engrg. 8 (2006) 63-91. (Pubitemid 44314813)
3. L. Borcea, Electrical impedance tomography, Inv. Prob. 18 (2002) R99-R136.
4. L. Borcea, Addendum to \Electrical impedance tomography", Inv. Prob. 19 (2003) 997-998.
5. M. Cheney, D. Isaacson and J. C. Newell, Electrical impedance tomography, SIAM Rev. 41 (1999) 85-101. (Pubitemid 129723749)
6. K.-S. Cheng, D. Isaacson, J. S. Newell and D. G. Gisser, Electrode models for electric current computed tomography, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg. 36 (1989) 918-924. (Pubitemid 19232669)
7. R. Dautray and J.-L. Lions, Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology, Vol. 2 (Springer, 1988).
8. M. Hanke, N. Hyv̈onen and S. Reusswig, An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41 (2009) 1948-1966.
9. M. Hanke, N. Hyvönen and S. Reusswig, Convex backscattering support in electric impedance tomography, Numer. Math., DOI:10.1007/s00211-010-0320-9.
10. E. Hebey, Nonlinear Analysis on Manifolds: Sobolev Spaces and Inequalities, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 5 (Courant Institute of Math. Sciences, 2000).
11. D. Holder, Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications (IOP, 2005).
12. N. Hyvönen, Complete electrode model of electrical impedance tomography: Approximation properties and characterization of inclusions, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 64 (2004) 902-931.
13. N. Hyvönen, Approximating idealized boundary data of electric impedance tomography by electrode measurements, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 19 (2009) 1185-1202.
14. A. Lechleiter, N. Hyvönen and H. Hakula, The factorization method applied to the complete electrode model of impedance tomography, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 68 (2008) 1097-1121.
15. W. R. B. Lionheart, EIT reconstruction algorithms: Pitfalls, challenges and recent developments, Physiol. Meas. 25 (2004) 125-142. (Pubitemid 38252208)
16. J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes, Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, Vol. I (Springer, 1972).
17. R. L. Parker, The inverse problem of resistivity sounding, Geophys. 142 (1984) 2143-2158.
18. A. Ramirez, W. Daily, B. Binley, D. LaBreque and D. Roelant, Detection of leaks in underground storage tanks using electrical resistance methods, J. Environ. Engrg. Geophys. 1 (1996) 189-203.
19. A. Ramirez, W. Daily, D. LaBreque, E. Owen and D. Chesnut, Monitoring an underground steam injection process using electrical resistance tomography, Water Res. 29 (1993) 73-87. (Pubitemid 23379511)
20. E. Somersalo, M. Cheney and D. Isaacson, Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52 (1992) 1023-1040. (Pubitemid 23572888)