Convex backscattering support in electric impedance tomography

Numerische Mathematik

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 373-396

  Hanke, Martin ^a   Hyvönen, Nuutti ^b   Reusswig, Stefanie ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651459422     PISSN: 0029599X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-010-0320-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brühl M.: Explicit characterization of inclusions in electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 32, 1327-1341 (2001).
2. Bryan K.: Numerical recovery of certain discontinuous electrical conductivities. Inverse Probl. 7, 827-840 (1991).
3. Dautray R., Lions J.-L.: Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology, vol. 2. Springer, Berlin (1988).
4. Gebauer B.: The factorization method for real elliptic problems. Z. Anal. Anwendungen 25, 81-102 (2006).
5. Haddar H., Kusiak S., Sylvester J.: The convex back-scattering support. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66, 591-615 (2005).
6. Hanke M.: On real-time algorithms for the location search of discontinuous conductivities with one measurement. Inverse Probl. 24, 045005 (2008).
7. Hanke M., Hyvönen N., Lehn M., Reusswig S.: Source supports in electrostatics. BIT Numer. Math. 48, 245-264 (2008).
8. Hanke M., Hyvönen N., Reusswig S.: Convex source support and its application to electric impedance tomography. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 1, 364-378 (2008).
9. Hanke M., Hyvönen N., Reusswig S.: An inverse backscatter problem for electric impedance tomography. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41, 1948-1966 (2009).
10. Hanke M., Kirsch A.: Samplingmethods. In: Scherzer, O. (eds) Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging, Springer, New York (2010).
11. Henrici P.: Applied and Computational Complex Analysis, vol. 1. Wiley, New York (1974).
12. Hettlich F., Rundell W.: The determination of a discontinuity in a conductivity from a single boundary measurement. Inverse Probl. 14, 67-82 (1998).
13. Hyvönen N.: Complete electrode model of electrical impedance tomography: approximation properties and characterization of inclusions. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 64, 902-931 (2004).
14. Hyvönen N.: Application of a weaker formulation of the factorization method to the characterization of absorbing inclusions in optical tomography. Inverse Probl. 21, 1331-1343 (2005).
15. Hyvönen N.: Application of the factorization method to the characterization of weak inclusions in electrical impedance tomography. Adv. Appl. Math. 39, 197-221 (2007).
16. Ito K., Kunisch K., Li Z.: Level-set function approach to an inverse interface problem. Inverse Probl. 17, 1225-1242 (2001).
17. Kang H., Seo J. K., Sheen D.: Numerical identification of discontinuous conductivity coefficients. Inverse Probl. 13, 113-123 (1997).
18. Kirsch A.: The factorization method for a class of inverse elliptic problems. Math. Nachr. 278, 258-277 (2005).
19. Kress R.: Inverse Dirichlet problem and conformal mapping. Math. Comput. Simul. 66, 255-265 (2004).
20. Kress R., Kühn L.: Linear sampling methods for inverse boundary value problems in potential theory. Appl. Numer. Math. 43, 161-173 (2002).
21. Kress R., Rundell W.: Nonlinear integral equations and the iterative solution for an inverse boundary value problem. Inverse Probl. 21, 1207-1223 (2005).
22. Kusiak S., Sylvester J.: The scattering support. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 56, 1525-1548 (2003).
23. Lions J.-L., Magenes E.: Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, vol. 1. Springer, Berlin (1972).
24. Rundell W.: Recovering an obstacle and its impedance from Cauchy data. Inverse Probl. 24, 045003 (2008).
25. Tutschke W., Vasudeva H. L.: An Introduction to Complex Analysis: Classical and Modern Approaches. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2005).
26. Triebel H.: Interpolation Theory, Function Spaces, Differential Operators. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin (1978).