Preparation and accurate measurement of pure ozone

Review of Scientific Instruments

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Janssen, Christof ^a,b   Simone, Daniela ^a,b   Guinet, Mickaël ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE MEASUREMENT; BUFFER VOLUME; COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS; HIGH PURITY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; OZONE DECOMPOSITION; OZONE PRODUCTION; REACTIVE GAS; VACUUM SYSTEM;

INERT GASES;

OZONE;

EID: 79953655389     PISSN: 00346748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3557512     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. S. Ichimura, H. Nonaka, Y. Morikawa, T. Noyori, T. Nishiguchi, and M. Kekura, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 22, 1410 (2004). 10.1116/1.1705592
2. V. Zhukov, I. Popova, and J. T. Yates, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18, 992 (2000). 10.1116/1.582288
3. D. D. Berkley, B. R. Johnson, N. Anand, K. M. Beauchamp, L. E. Conroy, A. M. Goldman, J. Maps, K. Mauersberger, M. L. Mecartney, J. Morton, M. Tuominen, and Y. J. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1973 (1988). 10.1063/1.100489
4. S. A. Mason, J. Arey, and R. Atkinson, J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 5649 (2009). 10.1021/jp9014614
5. Integrated Global Atmospheric Chemistry Observations for Ozone and UV.
6. P. Quevauviller, Trends Anal. Chem. 23, 171 (2004). 10.1016/S0165- 9936(04)00314-0 (Pubitemid 38304885)
7. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
8. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures.
9. K. Mauersberger, D. Hanson, and J. Morton, Geophys. Res. Lett. 12, 89 (1985). 10.1029/GL012i002p00089
10. When necessary, deviation from the ideal gas equation of state can be considered.
11. J. Viallon, P. Moussay, J. E. Norris, F. R. Guenther, and R. I. Wielgosz, Metrologia 43, 441 (2006). 10.1088/0026-1394/43/5/016 (Pubitemid 44508530)
12. JCGM/WG 1 2008, Evaluation of measurement data - guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement., Tech. Rep. (BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, 2008).
13. M. Guinet, D. Mondelain, C. Janssen, and C. Camy-Peyret, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 111, 961 (2010). 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.01.011
14. W. F. Giauque and J. D. Kemp, J. Chem. Phys. 6, 40 (1938). 10.1063/1.1750122
15. G. Wagner, M. Birk, F. Schreier, and J. M. Flaud, J. Geophys. Res. 107, (2002). 10.1029/2002JD002628 (Pubitemid 44793971)
16. S. Anderson and K. Mauersberger, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52, 1025 (1981). 10.1063/1.1136728 (Pubitemid 12440376)
17. K. Mauersberger, J. Barnes, D. Hanson, and J. Morton, Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 671 (1986). 10.1029/GL013i007p00671
18. J. Malicet, D. Daumont, J. Charbonnier, C. Parisse, A. Chakir, and J. Brion, J. Atmos. Chem. 21, 263 (1995). 10.1007/BF00696758
19. D. Daumont, J. Brion, J. Charbonnier, and J. Malicet, J. Atmos. Chem. 15, 145 (1992). 10.1007/BF00053756
20. C. Janssen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 379, 588 (2003). 10.1016/j.cplett.2003.08. 071
21. A. Kurokawa, K. Odaka, and S. Ichimura, in Proceedings of the European Vacuum Congress Berlin 2003, 23-26 June 2003, featuring the 8th European Vacuum Conference, 2nd Annual Conference of the German Vacuum Society
22. A. Kurokawa, K. Odaka, and S. Ichimura, [Vacuum 73, 301 (2004)]. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2003.12.018
23. C. Janssen and B. Tuzson, J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 9709 (2010). 10.1021/jp1017899
24. D. Hanson and K. Mauersberger, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 4669 (1986). 10.1063/1.451740
25. U. Kogelschatz, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 23, 1 (2003). 10.1023/A:1022470901385 (Pubitemid 36257393)
26. 2)dt.
27. 2, the buffer gas will be pushed in the direction of the ozone volume. Associated effects, such as total pressure rise and corresponding diminution of the diffusion constant as well as a shift of characteristic lengths l and L, will stay small and have negligable effects as long as ozone conversion remains small. Local decomposition even slows down overall ozone conversion, because total pressure and the effective buffer gas length (l) are increased. On the contrary, the entrance of buffer gas into the absorption cell is facilitated. An upper limit for buffer gas diffusion can nevertheless be obtained from Eq.: (i) estimate the pressure rise from Eq., (ii) recalculate l, L, and D assuming a new initial distribution of ozone and oxygen, where the converted ozone from (i) is removed from the ozone reservoir and its oxygen equivalent added to the oxygen volume, and (iii) determine the buffer gas diffusion using the new initial distribution obtained in step (ii).
28. Equation can be derived using the technique of superposition of point source distribution functions (see textbooks, such as Ref.) and for reasons of simplicity we have assumed a constant diameter gas line, even though the absorption cell connected to the longer buffer arm has a different diameter than the buffer line. Inspection of the solutions under measurement conditions (t 50 s) shows that the exact value of the length of the longer arm and the cell, which is around 330 cm, is not critical in terms of the absolute number of ozone molecules reaching the sensor head, because molecules from the closed boundary have not yet diffused into the buffer region. L has thus been adjusted in order to reflect the ratio of volumes between the two buffer arms assuming a constant diameter. This assures correct prediction of the relative pressure change.
29. J. Hirschfelder, C. F. Curtiss, and R. B. Bird, Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids, 2nd ed., Structure of Matter Series (Wiley, London, 1954).
30. J. A. Kaye, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 7865 (1986). 10.1029/JD091iD07p07865
31. A. O. Nier, W. E. Potter, D. R. Hickman, and K. Mauersberger, Radio Sci. 8, 271 (1973). 10.1029/RS008i004p00271
32. A. G. Hearn, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 78, 932 (1961). 10.1088/0370-1328/ 78/5/340
33. M. Guinet, D. Mondelain, C. Camy-Peyret, and C. Janssen, Absolute ozone absorption cross section at the 253.55 nm mercury line position. (in preparation).
34. A. Sandu and R. Sander, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 187 (2006). 10.5194/acp-6-187-2006
35. R. Atkinson, D. L. Baulch, R. A. Cox, J. N. Crowley, R. F. Hampson, R. G. Hynes, M. E. Jenkin, M. J. Rossi, and J. Troe, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 1461 (2004). 10.5194/acp-4-1461-2004
36. S. P. Sander, R. R. Friedl, D. M. Golden, M. J. Kurylo, G. K. Moortgat, H. Keller-Rudek, P. H. Wine, A. R. Ravishankara, C. E. Kolb, M. J. Molina, B. J. Finlayson-Pitts, R. E. Huie, and V. L. Orkin, Chemical kinetics and photochemical data for use in atmospheric studies: Evaluation no. 15, (JPL Publication 06-2, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 2006).
37. W. P. Dub, S. S. Brown, H. D. Osthoff, M. R. Nunley, S. J. Ciciora, M. W. Paris, R. J. McLaughlin, and A. R. Ravishankara, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 034101 (2006). 10.1063/1.2176058
38. J. Hjorth, J. Notholt, and G. Restelli, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 24, 51 (1992). 10.1002/kin.550240107
39. J. A. Neuman, L. G. Huey, T. B. Ryerson, and D. W. Fahey, Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 1133 (1999). 10.1021/es980767f (Pubitemid 29169183)
40. B. J. Finlayson-Pitts, L. M. Wingen, A. L. Sumner, D. Syomin, and K. A. Ramazan, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 223 (2003). 10.1039/b208564j
41. A. L. Goodman, G. M. Underwood, and V. H. Grassian, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 7217 (1999). 10.1021/jp9910688
42. W. M. Haynes, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 91st ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2010).
43. A. Abedi, P. Cicman, B. Coupier, B. Gulejova, G. A. Buchanan, G. Marston, N. J. Mason, P. Scheier, and T. D. Mark, Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 232, 147 (2004). 10.1016/j.ijms.2003.12.006
44. C. A. Cantrell, J. A. Davidson, A. H. McDaniel, R. E. Shetter, and J. G. Calvert, Chem. Phys. Lett. 148, 358 (1988). 10.1016/0009-2614(88)87288-9
45. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, Course of Theoretical Physics VI: Fluid Dynamics, 5th (German) ed. (Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1991).