Impact of the script in a supplemental reading program on instructional opportunities for student practice of specified skills

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 28-42

  Cooke, Nancy L ^a   Galloway, Tara W ^a   Kretlow, Allison G ^b   Helf, Shawnna ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WINTHROP UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

opportunities to respond; paraprofessionals; scripted programs; supplemental instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953648117     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022466910361955     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams, G.L., & Englemann, S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
2. Beck, I.L., Farr, R.C., Strickland, D.S., Ada, A.F., Brechtel, M., & McKeown, M.et al.(2007). Harcourt trophies: A Harcourt reading/language arts program. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt.
3. Bessellieu, F.B., Kozloff, M.A., & Rice, J.S. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of Direct Instruction teaching. Direct Instruction News, 4, 14-18.
4. Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41, 1069-1077.
5. Carnine, D. (1976). Effects of two teacher presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199-206.
6. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame'enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. (Eds.). (2004). Direct Instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/ Merrill/Prentice Hall.
7. Causton-Theoharis, J., Giangreco, M.F., Doyle, M.B., & Vadasy, P.F. (2007). Paraprofessionals: The "sous chefs" of literacy instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 56-62.
8. Cooper, J.O., Heron, T.E., & Heward, W.L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
9. Council for Exceptional Children. (1987). Academy for effective instruction: Working with mildly handicapped students. Res-ton, VA: Author.
10. Coyne, M.D., Kame'enui, E. J., & Carnine, D.W. (2007). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
11. DeVries, R. (2006). Sociomoral atmosphere in Direct Instruction, eclectic, and constructivist kindergartens: A study of teachers' enacted interpersonal understanding. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 4, 449-471.
12. Ellis, E.S., Worthington, L.A., & Larkin, M.J. (2002). Executive summary of the research synthesis on effective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators. Available athttp://idea.uorego.edu/-ncite/documents/techrep/tech06.html.
13. Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E.C. (1995). Reading Mastery. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
14. Engelmann, S., Engelmann, O., & Seitz-Davis, K.L. (1997). Horizons. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
15. Englert, C.S. (1984). Effective Direct Instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5(2), 38-47.
16. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436-450.
17. Furtak, E.M., Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Shemwell, J.T., Ayala, C.C., Brandon, P.R., & Shavelson, R.J., et al.(2008). On the fidelity of implementing embedded formative assessments and its relation to student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 360-389.
18. Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., & Garet, L. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 915-945.
19. Giangreco, M.F., Edelman, S.W., Broer, S.M., & Doyle, M.B. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68, 45-63.
20. Gibbs, S., Campbell, M., Helf, S., & Cooke, N. (2007). Early reading tutor. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
21. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
22. Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R.V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic achievement. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
23. Helf, S., Cooke, N.L., & Flowers, C.P. (2009). Effects of two grouping conditions on measures of reading achievement and efficiency for students at-risk for reading failure. Preventing School Failure, 53(2), 113-126.
24. Hempenstall, K. (2004). The importance of effective instruction. In N. E. Marchand-Martella, T. A. Slocum, & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to Direct Instruction (pp. 28-65). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
25. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. (2004).
26. Johnson, K.R., & Layng, T.J. (1994). The morningside model of generative instruction. In R. Gardner, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, & J. Eshelman,et al.(Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 173-197). Pacific Grove, CA: Brookes/Cole.
27. Kohl, H. (2009, January 8). The educational panopticon. Teachers College Record. Retrieved March 6, 2009, from http://www.tcrecord.org.
28. Kohler, D.W., Crilley, K., & Shearer, D.D. (2001). Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 240-250.
29. Kohler, D.W., Ezell, H.K., & Paluselli, M. (1999). Promoting changes in teachers' conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. Journal of Special Education, 33, 154-165.
30. Kovaleski, J.F., Gickling, E.E., Morrow, H., & Swank, P.R. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 170-183.
31. Kretlow, A.G., Wood, C.L., & Cooke, N.L. (2009). Using in-service and coaching to increase kindergarten teachers' accurate delivery of group instructional units. Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022466909341333.
32. Lane, K.L., Fletcher, T., Carter, E.W., Dejud, C., & DeLorenzo, J. (2007). Paraprofessional-led phonological awareness training with youngsters at risk for reading and behavioral concerns. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 266-276.
33. Maheady, L., Harper, G.F., Mallette, B., & Karnes, M. (2004). Preparing preservice teachers to implement class wide peer tutoring. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 52-62.
34. Morgan, R.L., Menlove, R., Salzberg, C.L., & Hudson, P. (1994). Effects of peer coaching on the acquisition of Direct Instruction skills by low-performing teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 59-76.
35. Przychodzin-Havis, A.M., Marchand-Martella, N.E., Martella, R.C., Miller, D.A., Warner, L., & Leonard, B.,et al.(2005). An analysis of Corrective Reading research. Journal of Direct Instruction, 5, 37-65.
36. Sawyer, K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33, 12-20.
37. Schieffer, C., Marchand-Martella, N., Martella, R., & Simonsen, F. (n.d.). The research base for Reading Mastery. Retrieved December 18, 2008, from https://www.sraonline.com/download/DI/Research/Reading/RM_Results_Brochure_low.pdf.
38. Simmons, D.C., Kame'enui, E.J., Harn, B., Coyne, M.D., Stoolmiller, M., & Santoro, L.E.,et al.(2007). Attributes of effective and efficient kindergarten reading intervention: An examination of instructional time and design specificity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 331-347.
39. Stebbins, L.B., St Pierre,. R.G., Proper, E.C., Anderson, R.B., & Cerva, T. (1997). Education as experimentation: A planned variation model, Vol. IV-A. An evaluation of Follow Through. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
40. Sterling, R., Barbetta, P.M., Heward, W.L., & Heron, T.E. (1997). A comparison of active student response and on-task instruction on the acquisition and maintenance of health facts by fourth grade special education students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 151-165.
41. Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. (2001). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 109-119.
42. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Reading first: Guide to U. S. Department of Education programs. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/index.html.
43. U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention (RtI) and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/rti_reading_pg_021809.pdf.
44. Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Peyton, J.A. (2006). Paraeducator-supplemented instruction in structural analysis with text reading practice for second and third graders at risk for reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 365-378.
45. Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Tudor, S. (2007). Effectiveness of paraeducator-supplemented individual instruction: Beyond basic decoding skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 508-525.
46. Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., & Hughes, M. (2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66, 163-171.
47. Watkins, C.L., & Slocum, T.A. (2004). The components of Direct Instruction. In N. E. Marchand-Martella, T. A. Slocum, & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to Direct Instruction (pp. 28-65). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
48. Wilkinson, L.A. (2006). Monitoring treatment integrity: An alternative to the "consult and hope" strategy in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology International, 27, 426-437.
49. Yoon, K.S., Duncan, T., Lee, S.W.-Y., Scarloss, B., Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007 -No. 033).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.