Distributed modelling of future changes in hydrological processes of Spencer Creek watershed

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1254-1270

  Sultana, Zakia ^a   Coulibaly, Paulin ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Climate change impact; Coupled MIKE SHE MIKE 11; Hydrologic processes; Physically distributed model; Statistical downscaling

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT; COUPLED MIKE SHE/MIKE 11; DISTRIBUTED MODELS; HYDROLOGIC PROCESS; STATISTICAL DOWNSCALING;

CATCHMENTS; CLIMATE MODELS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LANDFORMS; RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS); RUNOFF; SNOW; STREAM FLOW; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CATCHMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; CLIMATE MODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOWNSCALING; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FLOW MODELING; FUTURE PROSPECT; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PRECIPITATION ASSESSMENT; RECHARGE; WATERSHED;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA]; SPENCER CREEK;

EID: 79953331256     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7891     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbott MB, Bathurs JC, Cunge JA, O'Connell PE, Rasmussen J. 1986. An introduction to the European hydrological system-Système Hydrologique Europèen "SHE" 1: history and philosophy of a physically based distributed modeling system. Journal of Hydrology 87: 45-59.
2. Andersen J, Refsgaard JC, Jensen KH. 2001. Distributed hydrological modeling of the Senegal River Basin-model construction and validation. Journal of Hydrology 247: 200-214.
3. Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis (CCCma). 2009. .
4. Conover WJ. 1980. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd edn, Wiley: New York.
5. Coulibaly P, Dibike YB, Antcil F. 2005. Downscaling precipitation and temperature with temporal neural networks. Journal of Hydrometeorology 6: 483-496.
6. Crawford NH, Linsey RK. 1966. Digital simulation in hydrology, Stanford Watershed Model IV, Technical Report 39, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University: California, USA.
7. Demetriou C, Punthakey JF. 1999. Evaluating sustainable groundwater management options using the MIKE SHE integrated hydrogeological modeling package. Environmental Modeling and Software 14(2): 129-140.
8. DHI. 2005. MIKE 11: A Modeling System for Rivers and Channels-Short Introduction and Tutorial. Danish Hydraulic Institute: Denmark.
9. DHI. 2007. MIKE SHE User Manual, Volume 2: Reference Guide. Danish Hydraulic Institute: Denmark.
10. Dibike YB, Coulibaly P. 2005. Hydrologic impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models. Journal of Hydrology 307: 145-163.
11. Dibike YB, Coulibaly P. 2007. Validation of hydrological models for climate scenario simulation: the case of Saguenay watershed in Quebec. Hydrological Processes 21: 3123-3135.
12. Ewen J, Parkin G, O'Connell PE, SHETRAN. 2000. Distributed river basin flow and transport modeling system. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineering, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 5: 250-258.
13. Feyen L, Vàzquez R, Christiaens K, Sels O, Feyen J. 2000. Application of a distributed physically-based hydrological model to a medium size catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 4(1): 47-63.
14. HRCA. 1983. Hamilton Region Conservation Authority. Watershed Plan-Vols 1 and 2.
15. HRCA. 1990. Hamilton region conservation authority-MacLaren plansearch lavalin, Volume 1-Technical Report: Canada/Ontario Flood Damage Reduction Program.
16. Jaber FH, Shukla S. 2005. Hydrodynamic modeling approaches for agricultural storm water impoundments. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 131(4): 307-315.
17. Jasper K, Gurtz J, Lang H. 2002. Advanced flood forecasting in Alpine watersheds by coupling meteorological observations and forecasts with a distributed hydrological model. Journal of Hydrology 267: 40-52.
18. Jayatilaka CJ, Storm B, Mudgway LB. 1998. Simulation of water flow on irrigation bay scale with MIKE SHE. Journal of Hydrology 208: 108-130.
19. Johnson MS, Coon WF, Mehta VK, Steenhuis TS, Brooks ES, Boll J. 2003. Application of two hydrologic models with different runoff mechanisms to a hillslope dominated watershed in the northern US: a comparison of HSPF and SMR. Journal of Hydrology 284: 57-76.
20. Khan MS. 2007. Climate change impact study on water resources with uncertainty estimates using Bayesian neural network. PhD Thesis, McMaster University.
21. Kristensen KJ, Jensen SE. 1975. A model for estimating actual evapotranspiration from potential evapotranspiration. Nordic Hydrology 6: 170-188.
22. Lehmann EL. 1975. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Holden and Day: San Francisco.
23. Levene H. 1960. Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford University press: Palo Alto, California.
24. Linden R, Harlin J. 2000. Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling performance in different climates. Journal of Hydrology 238: 231-247.
25. Liu H, Chen X, Bao A, Wang L. 2007. Investigation of groundwater response to overland flow and topography using a coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modeling system for an arid watershed. Journal of Hydrology 347: 4-459.
26. McMichael CE, Hope AS, Loaiciga HA. 2006. Distributed hydrological modeling in California semi-arid shrublands: MIKE SHE model calibration and uncertainty estimation. Journal of Hydrology 317: 307-324.
27. Nash IE, Sutcliffe IV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290.
28. Nguyen VTV. 2005. Downscaling methods for evaluating the impacts of climate change and variability on hydrological regime at basin scale. Role of Water Sciences in Transboundary River Basin Management, Thailand.
29. Punthakey JF, Cooke R, Somaratne NM, Carr RS, Watson KK. 1993. Large-scale catchment simulation using the MIKE-SHE model: 2. Modelling the Berrigin irrigation district. In Environmental Management Geo-water and Engineering Aspects: Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Geo-water and Engineering Aspects, Chowdhury RN, Sivakumar SM (eds). A.A. Balkema: Leiden, The Netherlands; 467-472.
30. Refsgaard JC. 1997. Parameterization, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology 198: 69-97.
31. Refsgaard JC, Storm B. 1995. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications: Eaglewood, USA; 809-846.
32. Sahoo GB, Ray C, De Carlo EH. 2006. Calibration and validation of a physically distributed hydrological model, MIKE SHE, to predict streamflow at high frequency in a flashy mountainous Hawaii stream. Journal of Hydrology 327: 94-109.
33. Schubert S. 1998. Downscaling local extreme temperature changes in south-eastern Australian from the CSIRO Mark2 GCM. International Journal of Climatology 18: 1419-1438.
34. Scinocca JF, McFarlane NA, Lazare M, Li J, Plummer D. 2008. The CCCma third generation AGCM and its extension into the middle atmosphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8: 7055-7074.
35. Shalini O. 2006. runoff simulation in the Canagagigue creek watershed using the mike she model. M.A.Sc. Thesis, Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University.
36. Singh R, Subramanian K, Refsgaard JC. 1999. Hydrological modeling of a small watershed using MIKE SHE for irrigation planning. Agricultural Water Management 41(3): 149-166.
37. Singh VP, Woolhiser DA. 2002. Mathematical models in watershed hydrology (a review). Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 7(4): 270-292.
38. Sultana Z. 2009. Distributed modelling of Spencer Creek watershed and assessment of future changes in hydrologic processes. M.A.Sc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University.
39. Thompson JR, S?renson HR, Gavin H, Refsgaard A. 2004. Application of the coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modeling system to a lowland wet grassland in southeast England. Journal of Hydrology 293: 151-179.
40. Tollner EW. 2002. Natural Resources Engineering. Wiley Blackwell: Ames, Iowa, USA.
41. Wetterhall F, Bardossy A, Chen D, Halldin S, Xu C-Y. 2006. Daily precipitation-downscaling techniques in three Chinese regions. Water Resources Research 42: W11423, DOI: 10.1029/2005WR004573.
42. Wetterhall F, Halldin S, Xu C-Y. 2007. Seasonality properties of four statistical-downscaling methods in central Sweden. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 87: 123-137.
43. Wilby RL, Dawson CW, Barrow EM. 2002. SDSM-a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environmental Modeling and Software 17: 145-157.
44. Xevi E, Christiaens K, Espino A, Sewnandan W, Mallants D, Sørensen H, Feyen J. 1997. Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE SHE model using the Neuenkirchen catchment as case study. Water Resources Management 11: 219-242.