State laws regarding the retention and use of residual newborn screening blood samples

Pediatrics

Volumn 127, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 703-712

  Lewis, Michelle H ^a   Goldenberg, Aaron ^b   Anderson, Rebecca ^c   Rothwell, Erin ^d   Botkin, Jeffrey ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Consent; Dried blood samples; Ethics; Law; Newborn screening; Opt out; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICINE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CONFIDENTIALITY; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LAW; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; PARENTAL CONSENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BLOOD SPECIMEN COLLECTION; CONFIDENTIALITY; FEMALE; GENETIC PRIVACY; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABORATORIES, HOSPITAL; MALE; NEONATAL SCREENING; OWNERSHIP; PARENTAL CONSENT; SPECIMEN HANDLING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79953327702     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-1468     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Academy of Pediatrics/Health Resources and Services Administration Newborn Screening Task Force. Serving the family from birth to the medical home: newborn screening: a blueprint for the future: a call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs. Pediatrics. 2000;106(2 pt 2):389-422
2. Watson MS, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Mann MY, Rinaldo P, Howell RR. Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system. Genet Med. 2006;8(suppl 1):1S-252S
3. Mandl KD, Feit S, Larson C, Kohane IS. Newborn screening program practices in the United States: notification, research, and consent. Pediatrics. 2002;109(2):269-273 (Pubitemid 34126868)
4. Olney RS, Moore CA, Ojodu JA, et al. Storage and use of residual dried blood spots from state newborn screening programs. J Pediatr. 2006;148(5):618-622 (Pubitemid 43776916)
5. Sheman GG, Stevens G, Jones SA, Horsfield P, Stevens WS. Dried blood spots improve access to HIV diagnosis and care for infants in low-resource settings. J AIDS. 2005;38(5):615-617 (Pubitemid 40524486)
6. Michigan Department of Community Health. Michigan BioTrust for Health. www.michigan.gov/mdch/0,1607,7-132-2942-4911-4916-232933--,00html. Accessed January 7, 2010
7. American College of Medical Genetics. American College of Medical Genetics receives $13.5M NIH contract for the development of a Newborn Screening Translational Research Network [press release]. Available at: www.acmgfoundation.org/am/template.cfm?section=content-area-413&template=/ cm/contentdisplay.cfm&contentid=3630. Accessed March 10, 2010
8. Therrell BL, Hannon WH, Pass KA, et al. Guidelines for the retention, storage, and use of residual blood spot samples after newborn screening analysis: statement of the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services. Biochem Mol Med. 1996;57(2):116-124 (Pubitemid 26142732)
9. Therrell BL, Johnson A, Williams D. Status of newborn screening programs in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5 pt 2):S212-S252 (Pubitemid 46071311)
10. Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. Briefing paper: considerations and recommendations for national guidelines regarding the retention and use of residual dried blood spot specimens after newborn screening. Available at: www.hrsa.gov/ heritabledisorderscommittee/reports/RBSBriefingPaper0923.pdf. Accessed December 31, 2010
11. Institute of Medicine. Roundtable on translating genomic-based research for health. In: Olson S, Berger AC, Rapporteurs. Challenges and Opportunities in Using Residual Newborn Screening Samples for Translational Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010:51-54
12. Bearder et al v State of Minnesota, et al. Fourth Judicial Circuit, County of Hennepin District Court; November 24, 2009. Order granting motion to dismiss court file 27-CV-09-5615
13. Minn. Stat. §13.386 Treatment of Genetic Information Held by Government Entities and Other Persons. In: Government Data Practices. 2009
14. Beleno v Texas Dept. of State Health Serv. Case 5:2009cv00188. U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas in San Antonio, March 3, 2009
15. Texas Department of State Health Services. Newborn screening settlement [press release]. Available at: www.dshs.state.tx.us/news/releases/20091222.shtm. Accessed March 10, 2010
16. Ramshaw E. DNA deception. The Texas Tribune. Available at: www.texastribune.org/stories/2010/feb/22/dna-deception. Accessed April 15, 2010
17. Higgins v Texas Department of State Health Services, US District Court, Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, filed Dec 8, 2010
18. Unauthorized Storage or Use of DNA From Newborn Without Parental Consent, S 1250, Oklahoma State Senate, 52nd Legislature, 2nd Regular Session; 2010
19. Callaway E. Newborns' blood used to build secret DNA database. New Scientist. Available at: www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2010/02/ ewencallaway-reportertexas-he.html. Accessed April 18, 2010
20. Rothwell EW, Anderson RA, Burbank M, et al. Concerns of newborn screening advisory committee members regarding storage and use of residual newborn screening blood samples. Am J Public Health. ePub, February 17, 2011. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.200485