Concerns of newborn blood screening advisory committee members regarding storage and use of residual newborn screening blood spots

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 101, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2111-2116

  Rothwell, Erin W ^a   Anderson, Rebecca A ^b   Burbank, Matthew J ^a   Goldenberg, Aaron J ^c   Lewis, Michelle Huckaby ^d   Stark, Louisa A ^a   Wong, Bob ^a   Botkin, Jeffrey R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARENT; PUBLIC HEALTH;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BLOOD SPECIMEN COLLECTION; CONFIDENTIALITY; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEONATAL SCREENING; OWNERSHIP; PARENTS; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 79953298338     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.200485     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. Newborn screening position statement. Available at: http://www.astho.org/Advocacy/Policy-and- Position- Statements/2009-Newborn-Screening. Accessed April 27, 2010.
2. Botkin JR. Research for newborn screening: developing a national framework. Pediatrics. 2005;116(4): 862-871. (Pubitemid 44542812)
3. Botkin JR. Parental permission for research in newborn screening. In: Bailey M, Murray T, eds. Ethics and Newborn Genetic Screening. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.
4. Barbi M, Binda S, Caropppo S, Primache V. Neonatal screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection and hearing loss. J Clin Virol. 2006;35(2):206-209. (Pubitemid 43053401)
5. Burse VW, Deguzman MR, Korver MP, et al. Preliminary investigation of the use of dried-blood spots for the assessment of in utero exposure to environmental pollutants. Biochem Mol Med. 1997;61(2):236-239. (Pubitemid 27347227)
6. Hoff R, Berardi VP, Weiblen J, Mahoney-Trout L, Mitchell ML, Grady GF. Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus among childbearing women. Estimation by testing samples of blood from newborns. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(9):525-530. (Pubitemid 18083572)
7. Olney RS, Moore CA, Ojodu JA, Lindegren ML, Hannon WH. Storage and use of residual dried blood spots from state newborn screening programs. J Pediatr. 2006;148(5):618-622. (Pubitemid 43776916)
8. Kharaboyan L, Avard D, Knoppers BM. Storing newborn blood spots: modern controversies. J Law Med Ethics. 2004;32(4):741-748. (Pubitemid 40246336)
9. Therrell BL, Hannon H, Bailey D, et al. Considerations and recommendations for a national policy regarding the retention and use of dried-blood spot specimens after NBS. Available at: http://www. resourcerepository.org/documents/1681/briefingpaper:considerationsand recommendationsforanationalpolicyregardingthereten tionanduseofdriedbloodspotspecimensafternewborns. Accessed August 26, 2009.
10. American College of Medical Genetics. Position statement on the importance of residual newborn screening dried blood spots. Available at: http://www. acmg.net/StaticContent/NewsReleases/Blood-Spot- Position- Statement2009.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2009.
11. Serving the family from birth to the medical home. Newborn screening: a blueprint for the future-a call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs. Pediatrics. 2000;106(2 Pt 2):389-422.
12. Holtzman NA, Watson M. Promoting Safe and Effective Genetic Testing in the United States: Final Report of the Task Force on Genetic Testing. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1997.
13. Therrell BL, Panny SR, Davidson A, et al. U.S. newborn screening system guidelines: statement of the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services. Screening. 1992;1(2):135-147.
14. Hiller EH, Landenburger G, Natowicz MR. Public participation in medical policy-making and the status of consumer autonomy: the example of newborn-screening programs in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(8):1280-1288. (Pubitemid 27358021)
15. Citizens Council on Health Care. Governor Pawlenty failing to act on illegally obtained baby DNA [press release]. Available at: http://cchconline. org/pr/pr081507. php. Accessed July 17, 2008.
16. Maschke KJ. Disputes over research with residual newborn screening blood specimens. Available at: http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Bioethicsforum/Post. aspx? id=3826. Accessed December 10, 2010.
17. Puryear M, Weissman G, Watsom M, Mann M, Strickland B, van Dyck PC. The regional genetic and newborn screening service collaboratives: the first two years. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2006;12(4): 288-292. (Pubitemid 46053455)
18. Therrell BL, Johnson A, Williams D. Status of newborn screening programs in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5 Pt 2):S212-S252. (Pubitemid 46071311)
19. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
20. Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Primary care research: a multi-method typology and qualitative road map. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1992:3-28.
21. Tesch R. Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. London, UK: Falmer; 1990.
22. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
23. Morgan DL. Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qual Health Res. 1993;3(1):112-121.
24. Ard CF, Natowicz MR. A seat at the table: membership in federal advisory committees evaluating public policy in genetics. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(5): 787-790. (Pubitemid 32397916)
25. Kerr A. Rights and responsibilities in the genetics era. Crit Soc Policy. 2003;23(2):208-226.
26. Jesudason S. Bioethical transparency: public participation and responsible uses of human biotechnologies. Available at: http://www. scienceprogress.org/2009/03/bioethical-transparency. Accessed April 7, 2009.
27. Pelias MK, Markward NJ. Newborn screening, informed consent, and future use of archived tissue samples. Genet Test. 2001;5(3):179-185. (Pubitemid 34066160)
28. The Changing Moral Focus of Newborn Screening: An Ethical Analysis by the President's Council on Bioethics. Washington, DC: President's Council on Bioethics; 2008.