Correlation of corneal acoustic and elastic properties in a canine eye model

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 731-736

  He, Xiaoyin ^a   Liu, Jun ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LOADING TEST; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TENSILE STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; DOG; ECHOGRAPHY; ELASTIC TISSUE; ELASTICITY; ELASTOGRAPHY; IMPEDANCE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; DOGS; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTIC TISSUE; ELASTICITY; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE;

EID: 79953289114     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5723     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andreassen TT, Simonsen AH, Oxlund H. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res. 1980;31(4):435-441.
2. Edmund, C. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988;66(2):134-140.
3. Krueger RR. Biomechanical manipulation: the next frontier in corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(10):837-840.
4. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):146-155.
5. Orssengo GJ, Pye DC. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull Math Biol. 1999;61(3):551-572.
6. Johnson CS, Mian SI, Moroi S, Epstein D, Izatt J, Afshari NA. Role of corneal elasticity in damping of intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(6):2540-2544.
7. Liu J, He X. Corneal stiffness affects IOP elevation during rapid volume change in the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(5):2224-2229.
8. Woo SLY, et al. Nonlinear material properties of intact cornea and sclera. Exp Eye Res. 1972;14(1):29-39.
9. Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Rama P. Biomechanical properties of human and porcine corneas. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86(5):783-790.
10. Elsheikh A, Wang DF, Brown M, Rama P, Campanelli M, Pye D. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and their variation with age. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32(1):11-19.
11. Boyce BL, Jones RE, Nguyen TD, Grazier JM. Stress-controlled viscoelastic tensile response of bovine cornea. J Biomech. 2007; 40(11):2367-2376.
12. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156-162.
13. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the Ocular Response Analyzer. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(5):364-370.
14. He X, Liu J. A quantitative ultrasonic spectroscopy method for noninvasive determination of corneal biomechanical properties. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(11):5148-5154.
15. Liu J, He XY, Pan XL, Roberts CJ. Ultrasonic model and system for measurement of corneal biomechanical properties and validation on phantoms. J Biomech. 2007;40(5):1177-1182.
16. Christensen D. Ultrasonic Bioinstrumentation. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1988.
17. Yoon HS, Katz JL. Ultrasonic wave-propagation in human cortical bone: 2, measurements of elastic properties and microhardness. J Biomech. 1976;9(7):459-464.
18. Raum K, Leguerney I, Chandelier F, et al. Bone microstructure and elastic tissue properties are reflected in QUS axial transmission measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31(9):1225-1235.
19. Litniewski J. Determination, of the elasticity coefficient for a single trabecula of a cancellous bone: scanning acoustic microscopy approach. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31(10):1361-1366.
20. Raum K, Reisshauer J, Brandt J. Frequency and resolution dependence of the anisotropic impedance estimation in cortical bone using time-resolved scanning acoustic microscopy. J Biomed Materials Res Part A. 2004;71(3):430-438.
21. Brekhovskikh L. Waves in Layered Media. London: Academic Press; 1960.
22. Elsheikh A, Anderson K, Comparative study of corneal strip exten-sometry and inflation tests. J R Soc Interface. 2005;2(3):177-185.
23. Kampmeier J, Radt B, Birngruber R, Brinkmann R. Thermal and biomechanical parameters of porcine cornea. Cornea. 2000;19(3): 355-363.
24. Spoerl E, Huhle M, Seiler T. Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue. Exp Eye Res. 1998;66(1):97-103.
25. Peiffer R, Peterson-Jones S. Small Animal Ophthalmology: A Problem-oriented Approach. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier; 2001.
26. He X, Spoerl E, Tang JH, Liu J. Measurement of corneal changes after collagen crosslinking using a noninvasive ultrasound system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1207-1212.
27. Glass DH, Roberts CJ, Litsky AS, Weber PA. A viscoelastic biome-chanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(9): 3919-3926.
28. Tanter M, Touboul D, Gennisson JL, Bercoff J, Fink M. High-resolution quantitative imaging of cornea elasticity using supersonic shear imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28(12):1881-1893.
29. Rokhlin S, Wang L. Ultrasonic waves in layered anisotropic media: characterization of multidirectional composites. Int J Solids Struct. 2002;39(16):4133-4149.