Resting functional connectivity in patients with brain tumors in eloquent areas

Annals of Neurology

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 521-532

  Martino, Juan ^a   Honma, Susanne M ^b   Findlay, Anne M ^b   Guggisberg, Adrian G ^c   Owen, Julia P ^b   Kirsch, Heidi E ^b,d   Berger, Mitchel S ^d   Nagarajan, Srikantan S ^b,d  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MARQUÉS DE VALDECILLA   (Spain)

^b Biomagnetic Imaging Laboratory   (Spain)

^c GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN TUMOR; CANCER SURGERY; CRANIOTOMY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; GLIOMA; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; GLIOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE NET; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 79953278267     PISSN: 03645134     EISSN: 15318249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ana.22167     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger MS., Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 18-27.
2. Duffau H, Peggy Gatignol ST, Mandonnet E, et al. Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping of language pathways in a consecutive series of 115 patients with Grade II glioma in the left dominant hemisphere. J Neurosurg 2008; 109: 461-471.
3. Berger MS, Rostomily RC., Low grade gliomas: functional mapping resection strategies, extent of resection, and outcome. J Neurooncol 1997; 34: 85-101. (Pubitemid 27270254)
4. Sanai N, Berger MS., Mapping the horizon: techniques to optimize tumor resection before and during surgery. Clin Neurosurg 2008; 55: 14-19.
5. Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D, et al. Usefulness of intraoperative electrical subcortical mapping during surgery for low-grade gliomas located within eloquent brain regions: functional results in a consecutive series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg 2003; 98: 764-778. (Pubitemid 36396778)
6. Duffau H, Lopes M, Arthuis F, et al. Contribution of intraoperative electrical stimulations in surgery of low grade gliomas: a comparative study between two series without (1985-96) and with (1996-2003) functional mapping in the same institution. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 845-851. (Pubitemid 40805817)
7. Penfield W, Boldrey E., Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 1937; 60: 389-443.
8. Ojemann JG, Ojemann GA, Lettich E., Cortical stimulation mapping of language cortex by using a verb generation task: effects of learning and comparison to mapping based on object naming. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 33-38. (Pubitemid 34693697)
9. Schlosser MJ, Luby M, Spencer DD, et al. Comparative localization of auditory comprehension by using functional magnetic resonance imaging and cortical stimulation. J Neurosurg 1999; 91: 626-635. (Pubitemid 30133461)
10. Lurito JT, Lowe MJ, Sartorius C, et al. Comparison of fMRI and intraoperative direct cortical stimulation in localization of receptive language areas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 99-105.
11. Rutten GJ, van Rijen PC, van Veelen CW, et al. Language area localization with three-dimensional functional magnetic resonance imaging matches intrasulcal electrostimulation in Broca's area. Ann Neurol 1999; 46: 405-408. (Pubitemid 29416279)
12. Skirboll SS, Ojemann GA, Berger MS, et al. Functional cortex and subcortical white matter located within gliomas. Neurosurgery 1996; 38: 678-684.
13. Meyer PT, Sturz L, Schreckenberger M, et al. Preoperative mapping of cortical language areas in adult brain tumour patients using PET and individual non-normalised SPM analyses. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30: 951-960. (Pubitemid 37086936)
14. Schreckenberger M, Spetzger U, Sabri O, et al. Localisation of motor areas in brain tumour patients: a comparison of preoperative [18F]FDG-PET and intraoperative cortical electrostimulation. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28: 1394-1403. (Pubitemid 33815031)
15. Hirsch J, Ruge MI, Kim KH, et al. An integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging procedure for preoperative mapping of cortical areas associated with tactile, motor, language, and visual functions. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 711-721.
16. Bogomolny DL, Petrovich NM, Hou BL, et al. Functional MRI in the brain tumor patient. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 15: 325-335. (Pubitemid 40076327)
17. Vlieger EJ, Majoie CB, Leenstra S, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging for neurosurgical planning in neurooncology. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1143-1153. (Pubitemid 38979206)
18. Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R, Nimsky C, et al. Functional neuronavigation with magnetoencephalography: outcome in 50 patients with lesions around the motor cortex. Neurosurg Focus 1999; 6: E3.
19. Schiffbauer H, Berger MS, Ferrari P, et al. Preoperative magnetic source imaging for brain tumor surgery: a quantitative comparison with intraoperative sensory and motor mapping. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15: E7.
20. Roberts TP, Zusman E, McDermott M, et al. Correlation of functional magnetic source imaging with intraoperative cortical stimulation in neurosurgical patients. J Image Guid Surg 1995; 1: 339-347.
21. Mueller WM, Yetkin FZ, Hammeke TA, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging mapping of the motor cortex in patients with cerebral tumors. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 515-520.
22. Chen W, Ogawa S,. Principles of BOLD-functional MRI. In:, Moonen CTW, Bandettini PA, eds. Functional MRI. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000: 103-114.
23. Cohen D., Magnetoencephalography: detection of the brain's electrical activity with a superconducting magnetometer. Science 1972; 175: 664-666.
24. Schreiber A, Hubbe U, Ziyeh S, et al. The influence of gliomas and nonglial space-occupying lesions on blood-oxygen-level-dependent contrast enhancement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1055-1063. (Pubitemid 30390542)
25. Kober H, Nimsky C, Moller M, et al. Correlation of sensorimotor activation with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography in presurgical functional imaging: a spatial analysis. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 1214-1228. (Pubitemid 33049863)
26. Stippich C, Freitag P, Kassubek J, et al. Motor, somatosensory and auditory cortex localization by fMRI and MEG. Neuroreport 1998; 9: 1953-1957. (Pubitemid 28300546)
27. Varela F, Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, et al. The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 229-239. (Pubitemid 33673064)
28. Douw L, Baayen H, Bosma I, et al. Treatment-related changes in functional connectivity in brain tumor patients: a magnetoencephalography study. Exp Neurol 2008; 212: 285-290.
29. Schnitzler A, Gross J., Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6: 285-296. (Pubitemid 40469983)
30. Buzsaki G., Rhythms of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
31. Aertsen AM, Gerstein GL, Habib MK, et al. Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of "effective connectivity". J Neurophysiol 1989; 61: 900-917.
32. Friston KJ,. Brain function, nonlinear coupling, and neuronal transients. Neuroscientist 2001; 7: 406-418. (Pubitemid 32923756)
33. Bosma I, Douw L, Bartolomei F, et al. Synchronized brain activity and neurocognitive function in patients with low-grade glioma: a magnetoencephalography study. Neuro Oncol 2008; 10: 734-744.
34. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 9673-9678. (Pubitemid 40981739)
35. Fransson P., Spontaneous low-frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: an fMRI investigation of the resting-state default mode of brain function hypothesis. Hum Brain Mapp 2005; 26: 15-29. (Pubitemid 41232552)
36. Vincent JL, Patel GH, Fox MD, et al. Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain. Nature 2007; 447: 83-86. (Pubitemid 46685840)
37. de Jongh A, de Munck JC, Baayen JC, et al. Localization of fast MEG waves in patients with brain tumors and epilepsy. Brain Topogr 2003; 15: 173-179. (Pubitemid 36423053)
38. Fernandez-Bouzas A, Harmony T, Bosch J, et al. Sources of abnormal EEG activity in the presence of brain lesions. Clin Electroencephalogr 1999; 30: 46-52. (Pubitemid 29235035)
39. Kamada K, Moller M, Saguer M, et al. A combined study of tumor-related brain lesions using MEG and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. J Neurol Sci 2001; 186: 13-21. (Pubitemid 32544936)
40. Oshino S, Kato A, Wakayama A, et al. Magnetoencephalographic analysis of cortical oscillatory activity in patients with brain tumors: Synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM) functional imaging of delta band activity. Neuroimage 2007; 34: 957-964. (Pubitemid 46394460)
41. Harmony T, Marosi E, Fernandez T, et al. EEG coherences in patients with brain lesions. Int J Neurosci 1994; 74: 203-226. (Pubitemid 2051822)
42. Towle VL, Syed I, Berger C, et al. Identification of the sensory/motor area and pathologic regions using ECoG coherence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 106: 30-39. (Pubitemid 28079011)
43. Bartolomei F, Bosma I, Klein M, et al. How do brain tumors alter functional connectivity? A magnetoencephalography study. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 128-138. (Pubitemid 43042879)
44. Guggisberg AG, Honma SM, Findlay AM, et al. Mapping functional connectivity in patients with brain lesions. Ann Neurol 2008; 63: 193-203. (Pubitemid 351355298)
45. Berger MS, Deliganis AV, Dobbins J, et al. The effect of extent of resection on recurrence in patients with low grade cerebral hemisphere gliomas. Cancer 1994; 74: 1784-1791. (Pubitemid 24301834)
46. Mandonnet E, Delattre JY, Tanguy ML, et al. Continuous growth of mean tumor diameter in a subset of grade II gliomas. Ann Neurol 2003; 53: 524-528. (Pubitemid 36373265)
47. Vrba J, Robinson SE., Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. Methods 2001; 25: 249-271. (Pubitemid 34135432)
48. Sekihara K, Nagarajan SS, Poeppel D, et al. Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer source reconstruction technique in the presence of additive low-rank interference. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004; 51: 90-99. (Pubitemid 38009967)
49. Sekihara K, Nagarajan SS, Poeppel D, et al. Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001; 48: 760-771. (Pubitemid 32574936)
50. Sekihara K, Nagarajan SS, Poeppel D, et al. Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer technique in the presence of correlated neural activities: effects on signal intensity and time-course estimates. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002; 49: 1534-1546. (Pubitemid 36055711)
51. Sekihara K, Sahani M, Nagarajan SS., Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction. Neuroimage 2005; 25: 1056-1067. (Pubitemid 40591648)
52. Lopes da Silva FH, van Lierop TH, Schrijer CF, et al. Organization of thalamic and cortical alpha rhythms: spectra and coherences. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 35: 627-639.
53. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, et al. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 8: 194-208.
54. Le Van QM, Foucher J, Lachaux J, et al. Comparison of Hilbert transform and wavelet methods for the analysis of neuronal synchrony. J Neurosci Methods 2001; 111: 83-98. (Pubitemid 32930045)
55. Stam CJ, Breakspear M, van Cappellen van Walsum AM, et al. Nonlinear synchronization in EEG and whole-head MEG recordings of healthy subjects. Hum Brain Mapp 2003; 19: 63-78. (Pubitemid 36667339)
56. Fein G, Raz J, Brown FF, et al. Common reference coherence data are confounded by power and phase effects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 69: 581-584.
57. Nunez PL, Srinivasan R, Westdorp AF, et al. EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 103: 499-515. (Pubitemid 27505343)
58. Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, et al. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 2292-2307. (Pubitemid 39200796)
59. Berger MS, Ojemann GA, Lettich E., Neurophysiological monitoring during astrocytoma surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1990; 1: 65-80.
60. Berger MS, Ojemann GA., Intraoperative brain mapping techniques in neuro-oncology. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1992; 58: 153-161.
61. Haglund MM, Berger MS, Shamseldin M, et al. Cortical localization of temporal lobe language sites in patients with gliomas. Neurosurgery 1994; 34: 567-576. (Pubitemid 24100522)
62. Hill DL, Maurer CR, Jr., Maciunas RJ, et al. Measurement of intraoperative brain surface deformation under a craniotomy. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 514-526. (Pubitemid 28400123)
63. Karnofsky D, Burchenal JH., Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. New York: Columbia University Press, 1949: 191-205.
64. Roux FE, Boulanouar K, Lotterie JA, et al. Language functional magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of language areas: correlation with direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 1335-1345.
65. Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D, et al. Functional recovery after surgical resection of low grade gliomas in eloquent brain: hypothesis of brain compensation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 901-907. (Pubitemid 36782992)
66. Thiel A, Herholz K, Koyuncu A, et al. Plasticity of language networks in patients with brain tumors: a positron emission tomography activation study. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 620-629. (Pubitemid 33021920)
67. Roux FE, Boulanouar K, Ibarrola D, et al. Functional MRI and intraoperative brain mapping to evaluate brain plasticity in patients with brain tumours and hemiparesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 453-463.
68. Martino J, Taillandier L, Moritz-Gasser S, et al. Re-operation is a safe and effective therapeutic strategy in recurrent WHO grade II gliomas within eloquent areas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009; 151: 427-436.
69. Duffau H., New concepts in surgery of WHO grade II gliomas: functional brain mapping, connectionism and plasticity-a review. J Neurooncol 2006; 79: 77-115. (Pubitemid 44057422)