A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation-annotation system for english as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 155-180

  Chang, Chih Kai ^a   Hsu, Ching Kun ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF TAINAN   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Computer assisted language learning; Intensive reading; Reading comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953154747     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2010.536952     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391.
2. Antonio, B., Soledad, B., & Carlos, C. (2007). JGOMAS: A new approach to AI teaching. IEEE Transactions on Education, September, 1-8.
3. Brown, A.L., & Smiley, S.S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts. Child Development, 49(4), 1076-1088.
4. Chen, N.S., & Lee, Y.H. (2000). Group composition methods for cooperative learning in webbased instructional system. ICCE/ICCAI 2000.
5. Chinnery, G. (2006). Merging technologies - Going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9-16.
6. Cuseo, J. (1992). Cooperative learning vs. small-group discussions and group projects: The critical differences. Cooperative Learning and College Teaching, 2(3), 4-9.
7. Davidson, N. (1994). Cooperative and collaborative learning: An integrative perspective. In J.S. Thousand, R.A. Villa, & A.I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 13-30). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
8. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
9. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
10. Davis, J.N., & Lyman-Hager, M.A. (1997). Computers and L2 reading: Student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 58-72.
11. Gagne, E.D., Yekovich, C.W., & Yekovich, F.R. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little Brown.
12. Gamper, J., & Knapp, J. (2002). A review of intelligent CALL systems. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(4), 329-342.
13. Gillies, R.M., & Ashman, A.F. (2000). The effects of cooperative learning on students with learning difficulties in the lower elementary school. Journal of Special Educational Technology & Society, 34(1), 19-27.
14. Harris, A.J., & Sipay, E.R. (1985). How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods (8th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
15. Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-465.
16. Hilke, E.V. (1990). Cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
17. Hsu, C.K., Hwang, G.J., & Chang, C.K. (2010). Development of a reading material recommendation system based on a knowledge engineering approach. Computers & Education, 55(1), 76-83.
18. Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., & Wilson, B.G. (1998). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. New Jersey: Merrill, Prentice Hall, Inc.
19. Lan, Y.J., Sung, Y.T., & Chang, K.E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 130-151.
20. Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know, and words you can't guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 20-34). New York: Cambridge University.
21. Laufer, B., & Hill, M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 3(2), 58-76.
22. Lin, Z. (2002). Discovering EFL learners' perception of prior knowledge and its role in reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2), 172-190.
23. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C.A. (2002). Assessing students' metcognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
24. Ogata, H., Saito, N.A., Paredes, J.R.G., San Martin, G.A., & Yano, Y. (2008). Supporting classroom activities with the BSUL system. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 1-16.
25. Osuna, M.M., & Meskill, C. (1998). Using the world wide web to integrate Spanish language and culture: A pilot study. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 71-92.
26. Parker, R.E. (1985). Small-group cooperative learning - Improving academic, social gains in the classroom. NASSP Bulletin, 69(479), 48-57.
27. Peters, E. (2007). Manipulating L2 learners' online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 36-58.
28. Phinney, M. (1996). Exploring the virtual world: Computers in the second language writing classroom.In M.C. Pennington(Ed.),Thepower ofCALL(pp. 137-152).Houston:Athelstan.
29. Quade, A.M. (1996). An assessment of retention and depth of processing associated with notetaking using traditional pencil and paper and an on-line notepad during computer-delivered instruction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology 18th, Indianapolis, IN.
30. Roever, C., & Pan, Y.-C. (2008). Test review: GEPT: General English proficiency test. Language Testing, 25(3), 403-408.
31. Roscheisen, M., Mogensen, C., & Winograd, T. (1995). Shared web annotations as a platform for third-party value-added information providers: Architecture, protocols, and usage examples. Technical report CSDTR/DLTR.
32. Segler, T.M., Pain, H., & Sorace, A. (2002). Second language vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in ICALL environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(4), 409-422.
33. Sharan, S., & Shaulov, A. (1990). Cooperative learning, motivation to learn, and academic achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 173-202). New York: Praeger.
34. Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo, S.I., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products. Berlin: Springer.
35. Shih, S.P., Lee, F.M., & Chang, Y.F. (2007). The research of utilizing technology assistance in English teaching and learning - A case study of students of applied foreign language department in Far East University. Paper presented at the International Conference on Applied Linguistics and Foreign language Instruction.
36. Singer, M.H., & Crouse, J. (1981). The relationship of context-use skills to reading: A case for an alternative experimental logic. Child Development, 52(4), 1326-1329.
37. Slavin, R.E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 15-342.
38. Slavin, R.E. (1985). Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. New York: Plenum.
39. Slavin, R.E. (1990). Cooperative learning: The social psychology of the primary school. NY: KKY.
40. Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
41. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
42. Waring, R., & Nation, P. (2004). Second language reading and incidental vocabulary learning. Writing and Vocabulary in Foreign Language Acquisition, 4, 97.