Designing interruptive behaviors of a public environmental monitoring robot

HRI 2011 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 131-132

  Evers, Vanessa ^a   De Vhes, Roelof ^a   Alvito, Paulo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b IdMind   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Acceptance and trust; Environmental monitoring; Human robot interaction; Robot interruptions; Social robot behaviors

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE AND TRUST; ENVIRONMENTAL AGENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INDUSTRIAL AREA; INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENT; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; ROBOTIC AGENTS; SOCIAL ROBOTS; SOCIAL SKILLS;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; MACHINE DESIGN; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MOBILE AGENTS; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 79953151974     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1957656.1957696     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. B. Bailey, J. Konstan, and J. Carlis. (2001) The effects of interruptions on task performance, annoyance, and anxiety in the user interface. In Proceedings of INTERACT,
2. T. Bickmore and D. Schulman. Practical approaches to comforting users with relational agents. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, page 2296. ACM, 2007.
3. S. Brave, C. Nass, and K. Hutchinson. Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 62 (2): 161-178, 2005. (Pubitemid 40206241)
4. Brewster, S.A., McGookin, D.K. and Miller, C.A. (2006) Olfoto: Designing a smell-based interaction. In Proceedings of CHI, pp. 653-662
5. J. Cassell and T. Bickmore. Negotiated collusion: Modeling social language and its relationship effects in intelligent agents. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13 (1): 89-132, 2003.
6. R. Cialdini. (1985) Influence: Science and practice. Scott, Foresman Glenview, IL.
7. Cramer, H., Goddijn, J., Evers, V., and Wielinga B. (2010) Effects of (In)Accurate Empathy and Situational Valence on Attitudes towards Robots, Late breaking abstract, HRI' 10, Osaka, Japan.
8. Cramer, H., Evers, V., van Slooten, T., Ghijsen, M., and Wielinga, B. (2010) Trying Too Hard? Effects of Mobile Agents' (Inappropriate) Social Expressiveness on Trust, Affect and Compliance. ACM SIG CHI'10, 9-14 April, Atlanta, USA.
9. Hone, K. (2006) Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics. Interacting with Computers, 18( 2): 227-245.
10. J. Klein, Y. Moon, and R. Picard. This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results. Interacting with computers, 14 (2): 119-140
11. McFarlane, D. and Latorella, K. (2002) The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design. Human-Computer Interaction, 17 (1): 1-61. (Pubitemid 35350568)
12. Nguyen and Masthoff. J. (2009). Designing empathic computers: the effect of multimodal empathic feedback using animated agent. In Proceedings of Persuasive Technology, Claremont, California, USA, April 26-29.
13. Ochs, M., Pelachaud, C. and Sadek. D. (2008) An empathic virtual dialog agent to improve HCI. In Proceedings of Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 89-96. Peter
14. Parasuraman, R. and Miller, C. Trust and etiquette in highcriticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM, 47 (4): 51-55, 2004.
15. Wright and John McCarthy. (2008) Empathy and experience in HCI. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 637-646.
16. Yeshurun, Y., Sobel, N. (2010) An odor is not worth a thousand words: From multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects. A. R of Psy. Vol. 61, pp. 219-241.