Olfoto: Designing a smell-based interaction

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 653-662

  Brewster, Stephen A ^a   McGookin, David K ^a   Miller, Christopher A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Digital Photographs; Olfaction; Searching; Smell; Tagging

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL IMAGE STORAGE; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; ONLINE SEARCHING; PHOTOGRAPHY; TEXT PROCESSING;

DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS; OLFACTION; SEARCHING; SMELL; TAGGING;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 33745830902     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Aggleton, J.P. and Waskett, L. The ability of odours to serve as state-dependent cues for real-world memories: Can Viking smells aid the recall of Viking experience? British Journal of Psychology, 90 (1999), 1-7.
2. Arroyo, E., Selker, T. and Stouffs, A., Interruptions as multimodal outputs: which are the less disruptive? In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI'02), IEEE Press (2002), 479-482.
3. Bedersen, B., PhotoMesa: a zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps. In Proceedings of ACM UIST 2001, (Orlando, FL, USA), ACM Press (2001), 71-80.
4. Bodnar, A., Corbett, R. and Nekrasovski, D., AROMA: ambient awareness through olfaction in a messaging application. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI'04), (State College, PA, USA), ACM Press (2004), 183-190.
5. Cain, W.S. What we remember about odors. Perfumer and Flavorist, 9 (1984), 17-21.
6. Cann, A. and Ross, D. Olfactory stimuli as context cues in human memory. American Journal of Psychology, 102 (1) (1989), 91-102.
7. Engen, T. and Pfaffman, C. Absolute judgements of odor intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58 (1) (1959), 23-26.
8. Kaye, J. Aromatic Output for HCI. Interactions, 11 (1) (2004), 49-61.
9. Kaye, J. Symbolic Olfactory Display. MIT, Media. Arts and Science, School of Architecture and Planning, Masters Thesis, 2001.
10. Michael, G.A., Jacquot, L., Millot, J.-L. and Brand, G. Ambient odors modulate visual attentional capture. Neuroscience Letters (352) (2003), 221-225.
11. Rodden, K. and Wood, K.R., How Do People Manage Their Digital Photographs? In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2003, (Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA), ACM Press Addison Wesley (2003), 409-416.
12. Shneiderman, B. and Kang, H., Direct annotation: A drag-and-drop strategy for labelling photos. In Proceedings of IEEE Information Visualisation 2000, IEEE Press (2000), 88-95.
13. Strong, R. and Gaver, B., Feather,Scent and Shaker: Supporting Simple Intimacy. In Proceedings of CSCW '96, (Boston, MA, USA), ACM Press (1996), 29-30.
14. Tominaga, K., Honda, S., Ohsawa, T., Shigeno, H., Okada, K. and Matsushita, Y., "Friend Park" -expression of the wind and the scent on virtual space. In Proceedings of Virtual Systems and Multimedia '01, IEEE (2001), 507-515.
15. Washburn, D. and Jones, L.M. Could olfactory displays improve data visualization? Computing in Science & Engineering, 6 (6) (2004), 80-83.
16. Yanagida, Y., Noma, H., Tetsutani, N. and Tomono, A., An Unencumbering, Localized Olfactory Display. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2003, (Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA), ACM Press (2003), 988-989.