Effects of unreliable automation and individual differences on supervisory control of multiple ground robots

HRI 2011 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 371-378

  Chen, Jessie Y C ^a   Barnes, Michael J ^a   Kenny, Caitlin ^b  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Human robot interaction; Imperfect automation; Individual differences; Military; Multitasking; Simulation

Indexed keywords

GROUND ROBOT; IMPERFECT AUTOMATION; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; MAIN TASKS; MILITARY; MULTIPLE GROUNDS; MULTITASKING ENVIRONMENTS; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; RELIABILITY LEVEL; SIMULATION; SITUATION AWARENESS; SPATIAL ABILITIES; SUPERVISORY CONTROL; TARGET DETECTION; VISUAL SCANNING;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MULTITASKING; ROBOTICS; SPACE SHUTTLES;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 79953134807     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1957656.1957793     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Chen, J. Y. C., Durlach, P., Sloan, J., and Bowens, L. 2008. Human robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions. Mil. Psychol. 20, 3 (July 2008), 135-149. DOI=10.1080/08995600802115904.
2. Schurr, N. 2007. Toward human-multiagent teams. Doctoral Thesis. Pub No. 3291875, Univ. of Southern California.
3. th ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (La Jolla, CA, Mar 11-13, 2009). HRI '09. ACM, New York, 141-147. DOI= 10.1145/1514095.1514122.
4. rd ACMJIEEE Int. Conf on Human-Robot Interaction (Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Mar. 12-15, 2008). HRI '08. ACM, New York, 9-15. DOI= 10.1145/1349822.1349825.
5. Linegang, M., Stoner, H., Patterson, M., Seppelt, B., Hoffman, J., Crittendon, Z., and Lee, J. 2006. Humanautomation collaboration in dynamic mission planning: A challenge requiring an ecological approach. In Proc. 50th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (San Francisco, CA, Oct. 16-20, 2006). HFES '06. HFES, Santa Monica, CA, 2482-2486. (Pubitemid 351742163)
6. rd ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Mar. 12-15, 2008). HRI '08. ACM, New York, 375-382.
7. Chen, J. Y. C., Barnes, M. J., and Qu, Z. 2010. RoboLeader: An agent for supervisory control of multiple robots. In Proc. 5' ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (Osaka, Japan, Mar 2-5, 2010). HRI '10. ACM, New York, 81-82.
8. Endsley, M. and Kiris, E. 1995. The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors 37 (Jun 1995), 381-394.
9. Meyer, J. 2004. Conceptual issues in the study of dynamic hazard warnings. Human Factors 46 (Summer 2004), 196204.
10. Wickens, C., Dixon, S., Goh, J., and Hammer, B. 2005. Pilot dependence on imperfect diagnostic automation in simulated UAVf lights: An attentional visual scanning analysis. Tech Report: AHFD-05-02/MAAD-05-02, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 2005.
11. Dixon, S., Wickens, C., and McCarley, J. 2007. On the independence of compliance and reliance: Are automation false alarms worse than misses? Human Factors 49 (Aug. 2007), 564-572 (Pubitemid 47122687)
12. Wickens, C., Dixon, S., and Johnson N. 2005. UAV automation: Influence of task priorities and automation imperfection in a difficult surveillance task. Tech Report: AHFD-05-20/MAAD-05-6, Univ. of Illinois, UrbanaChampaign, IL, 2005.
13. Wickens, C., and Dixon, S. 2005. Is there a magic number 7 (to the minus 1)? The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Tech Report: AHFD-05-01/MAAD-05-01, Univ. of Illinois, UrbanaChampaign, IL, 2005.
14. Lathan, C. and Tracey, M. 2002. The effects of operator spatial perception and sensory feedback on human-robot teleoperation performance. Presence 11 (Aug. 2002), 368377.
15. Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D., and Evans, J. 2001. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Exp. Psychol: Human Perception and Performance 27 (Aug. 2001), 763-797. (Pubitemid 33651426)
16. Derryberry, D. and Reed, M. 2002. Anxiety-related Attentional Biases and Their Regulation by Attentional Control. J. Abnormal Psychol. 111 (May 2002), 225-236. (Pubitemid 34441201)
17. Chen, J. Y. C. and Joyner, C. 2009. Concurrent performance of gunner's and robotic operator's tasks in a multi-tasking environment. Mil. Psychol. 21, 1 (Jan. 2009), 98-113.
18. th ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (La Jolla, CA, Mar 11-13, 2009). HRI '09. ACM, New York, 181-188. DOI=10.1145/1514095.1514128.
19. Barber, D., Davis, L., Nicholson, D., Finkelstein, N, and Chen, J. Y. C. 2008. The mixed initiative experimental (MIX) testbed for human robot interactions with varied levels of automation. In Proc. 26th Army Sci. Conf (Orlando, FL, Dec. 1-4, 2008). ASC '08. US Dept. of Army, Washington, DC.
20. Snyder, M., Qu, Z., Chen, J. Y. C., and Barnes, M. 2010. RoboLeader for reconnaissance by a team of robotic vehicles. In Proc. Int. Symp. on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (Chicago, May 17-21, 2010). CTS '10. IEEE, New York, 522-530.
21. Ekstrom, R., French J., and Harman, H. 1976. Kit of FactorReferenced Cognitive Tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
22. Hart, S., and Staveland, L. 1988. Development of NASA TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Human Mental Workload, P. Hancock & N. Meshkati, Eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 139-183.
23. Jian, J., Bisantz, A., and Drury, C. 2000. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cognitive Ergonomics A (Jan. 2000), 53-71.
24. Green, D. and Swets, J. 1988. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York.
25. Endsley, M. and Bolstad, C. 1994. Individual differences in pilot situation awareness. Int. J. Aviation Psychol. 4 (July 1994), 241-264.
26. Endsley, M. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37 (Mar 1995), 32-64.
27. Chappelle, W., McMillan, K., Novy, P., and McDonald, K. 2010. Psychological profile of USAF unmanned aerial systems Predator and Reaper pilots. Aviat., Space, & Envir. Med 81 (May 2010), 339.
28. Chappelle, W., Novy, P., Randall, B., and McDonald, K. 2010. Critical psychological attributes of U.S. Air Force (USAF) Predator and Reaper sensor operators according to subject matter experts. Aviat., Space, &Envir. Med. 81 (May 2010), 253.
29. Rodes, W., Brooks, J., and Gugerty, L. 2005. Using verbal protocol analysis and cognitive modeling to understand strategies used for cardinal direction judgments. Poster presented at the Human Factors of UAVs Workshop (Mesa, AZ, May 25-26, 2005).
30. Feldman Barrett, L., Tugade, M., and Engle, R. 2004. Individual differences in working memory capacity and dualprocess theories of the mind. Psychol. Bull. 130 (July 2004), 553-573. (Pubitemid 38882636)
31. Wickens, C. and Hollands, J. 2000. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 97.
32. Chen, J. Y. C. in press. Individual differences in humanrobot interaction in a military multitasking environment. J. Cognitive Engineering & Decision Making (Special Issue on Improving HRI in Complex Operational Environments: Translating Theory into Practice).