Robots that express emotion elicit better human teaching

HRI 2011 - Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 347-354

  Leyzberg, Dan ^a   Avrunin, Eleanor ^a   Liu, Jenny ^b   Scassellati, Brian ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Amity High School   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Emotion; Human teacher; Robot

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; EMOTION; HUMAN TEACHER;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 79953132682     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1957656.1957789     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. E. Aronson. The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4:1-34, 1969.
2. C. Bartneck. Interacting with an embodied emotional character. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI), pages 55-60, 2003.
3. R. Beale and C. Creed. Affective interaction: How emotional agents affect users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(9):755-776, 2009.
4. D. Berry, L. Butler, and F. De Rosis. Evaluating a realistic agent in an advice-giving task. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(3):304-327, 2005. (Pubitemid 41066445)
5. T. Bickmore and R. Picard. Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2):327, 2005.
6. C. Breazeal and A. Thomaz. Learning from human teachers with socially guided exploration. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 3539-3544, 2008.
7. W. Burleson and R. W. Picard. Gender-Specific Approaches to Developing Emotionally Intelligent Learning Companions. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22:62-69, 2007. (Pubitemid 47274707)
8. J. Cassell and K. Thorisson. The power of a nod and a glance: Envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4):519-538, 1999.
9. C. Creed and R. Beale. Psychological Responses to Simulated Displays of Mismatched Emotional Expressions. Interacting with Computers, 20(2):225-239, 2008.
10. T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and autonomous systems, 42(3-4):143-166, 2003.
11. D. Goleman. Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. Random House, Inc., 2006.
12. H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, and Y. Yasuda. Interactive robots for communication-care: a case-study in autism therapy. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pages 341 - 346, aug. 2005.
13. I. Leite, A. Pereira, C. Martinho, and A. Paiva. Are emotional robots more fun to play with? In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pages 77-82, 2008.
14. K. Liu and R. Picard. Embedded empathy in continuous, interactive health assessment. CHI Workshop on HCI Challenges in Health Assessment, 2005.
15. A. Lockerd and C. Breazeal. Tutelage and socially guided robot learning. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 4:3475-3480, 2004.
16. H. Maldonado, J. Lee, S. Brave, C. Nass, H. Nakajima, R. Yamada, K. Iwamura, and Y. Morishima. We learn better together: Enhancing eLearning with emotional characters. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL), page 417, 2005.
17. S. C. Marsella and J. Gratch. EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(1):70-90, 2009. Modeling the Cognitive Antecedents and Consequences of Emotion.
18. A. Thomaz and C. Breazeal. Teachable robots: Understanding human teaching behavior to build more effective robot learners. Artificial Intelligence, 172(6-7):716-737, 2008.