Spatial synchrony through density-independent versus density-dependent dispersal

Journal of Biological Dynamics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 31-39

  Münkemüller, Tamara ^a,b   Johst, Karin ^b  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b Forest Ecology ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Conditional dispersal; Gompertz; Intraspecific density regulation; Microtus oeconomus; Over compensation; Under compensation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISPERSAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY;

ANIMAL DISTRIBUTION; ANIMALS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY;

EID: 79953116027     PISSN: 17513758     EISSN: 17513766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17513750801942529     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andreassen, H. P., and Ims, R. A., 2001. Dispersal in patchy vole populations:role of patch configuration, density dependence, and demography. Ecology, 82:2911–2926.
2. Ashwin, P., 2003. Nonlinear dynamics–synchronisation from chaos. Nature, 422:384–385.
3. Bjrnstad, O. N., 2000. Cycles and synchrony:two historical ‘experiments’ and one experience. J. Animal Ecol., 69:869–873.
4. Buonaccorsi, J. P., 2001. Measuring and testing for spatial synchrony. Ecology, 82:1668–1679.
5. DenBoer, P. J., 1968. Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. Acta Biotheoretica, 18:165–194.
6. Galassi, M., 2002. GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual, 2
7. Hassell, M. P., 1975. Density-dependence in single-species populations. J. Animal Ecol., 44:283–295.
8. Heino, M., Kaitala, V., Ranta, E., and Lindstrm, J., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Synchronous dynamics and rates of extinction in spatially structured populations, Vol. 264, pp. 481–486.
9. Ims, R. A., and Andreassen, H. P., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Density-dependent dispersal and spatial population dynamics, Vol. 272, pp. 913–918.
10. Ims, R. A., and Anderson, H. P., 2000. Spatial synchronization of vole population dynamics by predatory birds. Nature, 408:194–196.
11. Johst, K., and Schps, K., 2003. Persistence and conservation of a consumer-resource metapopulation with local overexploitation of resources. Biol. Conservation, 109:57–65.
12. Johst, K., and Drechsler, M., 2003. Are spatially correlated or uncorrelated disturbance regimes better for the survival of species? Oikos, 103:449–456.
13. Kendall, B. E., 2000. Dispersal, environmental correlation, and spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Am. Nat., 155:628–636.
14. Koelle, K., and Vandermeer, J., 2005. Dispersal-induced desynchronization:from metapopulations to metacommunities. Ecol. Lett., 8:167–175.
15. Koenig, W. D., 2002. Global patterns of environmental synchrony and the Moran effect. Ecography, 25:283–288.
16. Lande, R., Engen, S., and Saether, B. E., 1999. Spatial scale of population synchrony:environmental correlation versus dispersal and density regulation. Am. Nat., 154:271–281.
17. Liebhold, A. M., Johnson, D. N., and Bjornstad, O. N., 2006. Geographic variation in density-dependent dynamics impacts the synchronizing effect of dispersal and regional stochasticity. Popul. Ecol., 48:131–138.
18. Liebhold, A., Koenig, W. D., and Bjrnstad, O. N., 2004. Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 35:467–490.
19. Matter, S. F., 2001. Synchrony, extinction, and dynamics of spatially segregated, heterogeneous populations. Ecol. Model., 141:217–226.
20. May, R. M., 1974. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems, Princeton:Princeton University Press.
21. Münkemüller, T., and Johst, K., 2006. Compensatory versus over-compensatory density regulation:implications for metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes. Ecol. Model., 197:171–178.
22. Münkemüller, T., and Johst, K., 2007. How does intraspecific competition influence metapopulation synchrony and persistence?. J. Theor. Biol., 245:553–563.
23. Murrell, D. J., Travis, J. M.J, and Dytham, C., 2002. The evolution of dispersal distance in spatially-structured populations. Oikos, 97:229–236.
24. Oksanen, T., 1999. Population fluctuations of voles in North Fennoscandian tundra:contrasting dynamics in adjacent areas with different habitat composition. Oikos, 86:463–478.
25. Palmqvist, E., and Lundberg, P., 1998. Population extinctions in correlated environments. Oikos, 83:359–367.
26. Petchey, O. L., Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L., and Wilson, H. B., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Effects on population persistence:the interaction between noise colour, intraspecific competition and spac, Vol. 264, pp. 1841–1847.
27. R Development Core Team. 2005. R:A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
28. Ranta, E., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. Synchrony in population-dynamics., Vol. 262, pp. 113–118.
29. Ranta, E., Kaitala, V., Lindstrom, J., and Helle, E., 1997. The Moran effect and synchrony in population dynamics. Oikos, 78:136–142.
30. Ranta, E., Kaitala, V., and Lundberg, P., 1998. Population variability in space and time:the dynamics of synchronous population fluctuations. Oikos, 83:376–382.
31. Ripa, J., 2000. Analysing the Moran effect and dispersal:their significance and interaction in synchronous population dynamics. Oikos, 89:175–187.
32. Ripa, J., and Lundberg, P., 2000. The route to extinction in variable environments. Oikos, 90:89–96.
33. Ruxton, G. D., Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. Low level of immigration between chaotic populations can reduce system extinctions by inducing asynchronous regular cycles, Vol. 256, pp. 189–193.
34. Ruxton, G. D., and Rohani, P., 1998. Fitness-dependent dispersal in metapopulations and its consequences for persistence and synchrony. J. Animal Ecol., 68:530–539.
35. Williams, D. W., and Liebhold, A. M., 2000. Spatial synchrony of spruce budworm outbreaks in eastern North America. Ecology, 81:2753–2766.
36. Ylikarjula, J., Alaja, S., Laakso, J., and Tesar, D., 2000. Effects of patch number and dispersal patterns on population dynamics and synchrony. J.Theor. Biol., 207:377–387.