Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer

International Ophthalmology

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 651-659

  Renier, Charlotte ^a   Zeyen, Thierry ^a   Fieuws, Steffen ^b,c   Vandenbroeck, Sofie ^a   Stalmans, Ingeborg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b KU LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Dynamic contour tonometer; Goldmann; Ocular response analyzer

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETER; EYE EXAMINATION; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; TONOMETER; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ADOLESCENT; AGED; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LINEAR MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953061243     PISSN: 01655701     EISSN: 15732630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-010-9377-9     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1-30 (Pubitemid 23234285)
2. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367-408 (Pubitemid 30151145)
3. Noecker RS, Dirks MS, Choplin NT, Bernstein P, Batoosingh AL, Whitcup SM (2003) A six-month randomized clinical trial comparing the intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 13:55-63 (Pubitemid 36020425)
4. Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M, Grosserr M, Wiegand W (2007) The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologe 104:484-489
5. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 14:344-350 (Pubitemid 41383326)
6. Quan H, Shih WJ (1996) Assessing reproducibility by the within-subject coefficient of variation with random effects models. Biometrics 52(4):1195-1203 (Pubitemid 26425271)
7. Bland JM, Altman BG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
8. Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135-160 (Pubitemid 29425900)
9. Ku J Y F, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee C N J (2006) Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye 20:191-198
10. Schneider E, Grehn F (2006) Intraocular pressure measurement: comparison of dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. J Glaucoma 15:2-6 (Pubitemid 43068411)
11. Doyle A, Lackhar Y (2005) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 14:288-292 (Pubitemid 41023013)
12. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brushini P (2007) Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:272-279 (Pubitemid 46711364)
13. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2003) Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3118-3121
14. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:763-767 (Pubitemid 41300416)
15. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J (2006) Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4410-4414 (Pubitemid 46579366)
16. Johannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Linden C (2007) Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Acta Ophthalmol 86(6):614-621
17. Siganos D, Papastergiou G, Moedas C (2004) Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:746-751 (Pubitemid 38501466)