Predicting local population distributions around a central shelter based on a predation risk-growth trade-off

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 222, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1448-1455

  Biesinger, Zy ^a   Bolker, Benjamin M ^a,b   Lindberg, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Distance from shelter; Foraging competition; Habitat quality; Ideal free distribution; Local population distribution model; Predation risk

Indexed keywords

DISTANCE FROM SHELTER; FORAGING COMPETITION; FREE DISTRIBUTION; HABITAT QUALITY; LOCAL POPULATION DISTRIBUTION MODEL; PREDATION RISK;

ANIMALS; COMPETITION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEMS; POPULATION STATISTICS; REACTION INTERMEDIATES; RISK PERCEPTION;

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

ANIMAL; CONSPECIFIC; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT USE; HETEROGENEITY; IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PREDATION RISK; PREY AVAILABILITY; SHELTER; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 79953029235     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abrahams M.V., Pratt T.C. Hormonal manipulations of growth rate and its influence on predator avoidance - foraging trade-offs. Can. J. Zool. 2000, 78:121-127.
2. Acosta F.J., López F., Serrano J.M. Dispersed versus central-place foraging: intra- and intercolonial competition in the strategy of trunk trail arrangement of a harvester ant. Am. Nat. 1995, 145:389-411.
3. Bakker E.S., Reiffers R.C., Olff H. Experimental manipulation of predation risk and food quality: effect on grazing behavior in a central-place foraging herbivore. Oecologia 2005, 146:157-167.
4. Bednekoff P.A., Lima S.L. Re-examining safety in numbers: interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behaviour. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1998, 265:2021-2026.
5. Bopardikar S.D., Bullo F., Hespanha J.P. Sensing limitations in the lion and man problem. Amer Contr. Conf. 2007, 5958-5963.
6. Boyce M.S., Vernier P.R., Nielsen S.E., Schmiegelow F.K.A. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol. Model. 2002, 157:281-300.
7. Broom M., Ruxton G.D. You can run-or you can hide: optimal strategies for cryptic prey against pursuit predators. Behav. Ecol. 2005, 16:534-540.
8. Cooper W.E. Tradeoffs between predation risk and feeding in a lizard, the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). Behaviour 2000, 137:1175-1189.
9. Eggleston D.B., Lipcius R.N., Miller D.L. Artificial shelters and survival of juvenile Caribbean spiny lobster Panulirus argus: spatial, habitat, and lobster size effects. Fish. Bull. 1992, 90:691-702.
10. Fretwell S.D., Lucas H.L. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor. 1970, 19:136-156.
11. Giraldeau L.A., Kramer D.L., Deslandes I., Lair H. The effect of competitors and distance on central place foraging eastern chipmunks, Tamias striatus. Anim. Behav. 1994, 47:621-632.
12. Giske J., Rosland R., Berntsen J., Fiksen Ø. Ideal free distribution of copepods under predation risk. Ecol. Model. 1997, 95:45-59.
13. Hemmi J.M. Predator avoidance in fiddler crabs: 1. Escape decisions in relation to the risk of predation. Anim. Behav. 2005, 69:603-614.
14. Hovel, K., Lowe, C., 2007. Shelter use, movement, and home range of spiny lobsters in San Diego County. California Sea Grant Post-Award Technical Report R/MLPA-04.
15. Hebblewhite M., Merrill E.H., McDonald T.L. Spatial decomposition of predation risk using resource selection functions: an example in a wolf-elk predator-prey system. Oikos 2005, 111:101-111.
16. Johns D.W., Armitage K.B. Behavioral ecology of alpine yellow-bellied marmots. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1979, 5:133-157.
17. Johnson D.W. Predation, habitat complexity, and variation in density-dependent mortality of temperate reef fishes. Ecology 2006, 87:1179-1188.
18. Kacelnik A., Krebs J.R., Bernstein C. The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1992, 7:50-55.
19. Karnad N., Isler V. Bearing-only pursuit. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation 2008, 2665-2670.
20. Karnofsky E.B., Atema J., Elgin R.H. Field observations of social behavior, shelter use, and foraging in the lobster, Homarus americanus. Biol. Bull. 1989, 176:239-246.
21. Lewis D.B., Eby L.A. Spatially heterogeneous refugia and predation risk in intertidal salt marshes. Oikos 2002, 96:119-129.
22. Lima S.L., Dill L.M. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 1990, 68:619-640.
23. Lindberg W.J., Frazer T.K., Portier K.M., Vose F., Loftin J., Murie D.J., et al. Density-dependent habitat selection and performance by a large mobile reef fish. Ecol. Appl. 2006, 16:731-746.
24. MacCall A.D. Dynamic Geography of Marine Populations 1990, University of Washington Press.
25. Oro D. Living in a ghetto within a local population: an empirical example of an ideal despotic distribution. Ecology 2008, 89:838-846.
26. Perry G., Pianka E.R. Animal foraging: past, present and future. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997, 12:360-364.
27. Pyke G.H. Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1984, 15:523-575.
28. Quinn J.L., Cresswell W. Predator hunting behavior and prey vulnerability. J. Anim. Ecol. 2004, 73:143-154.
29. R Core Development Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2010, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/.
30. Rosenzweig M.L. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 1981, 62:327-335.
31. Sale P.F. Extremely limited home range in a coral reef fish, Dascyllus aruanus (Pisces; Pomacentridae). Copeia 1971, 1971:324-327.
32. Sandin S.A., Pacala S.W. Fish aggregation results in inversely density-dependent predation on continuous coral reefs. Ecology 2005, 86:1520-1530.
33. Schooley R.L., Sharpe P.B., Van Horne B. Can shrub cover increase predation risk for a desert rodent?. Can. J. Zool. 1996, 74:157-163.
34. Scrimgeour G.J., Culp J.M. Foraging and evading predators: the effect of predator species on a behavioural trade-off by a lotic mayfly. Oikos 1994, 69:71-79.
35. Stearns S.C. The evolution of life histories 1992, Oxford University Press.
36. Walters C.J., Martell S.J.D. Fisheries Ecology and Management 2004, Princeton University Press.
37. Werner E.E., Gilliam J.F. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1984, 15:393-425.
38. White K.A.J., Murray J.D., Lewis M.A. Wolf-deer interactions: a mathematical model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1996, 163:299-305.