Correlations between energy and displacement demands for performance-based seismic engineering

Pure and Applied Geophysics

Volumn 168, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 237-259

  Fabrizio, Mollaioli ^a   Bruno, Silvia ^a   Decanini, Luis ^a   Saragoni, Rodolfo ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRENT STRUCTURE; CYCLIC RESPONSE; DATA SETS; DEFORMATION DEMANDS; DISPLACEMENT DEMAND; DISSIPATED ENERGY; DISSIPATION MECHANISM; DRIFT RATIO; EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; ENERGY DEMANDS; ENERGY IMPARTED; ENERGY MEASURE; ENERGY SPECTRA; FREQUENCY CONTENTS; FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP; GROUND MOTION INTENSITY MEASURES; GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS; GROUND MOTIONS; HYSTERETIC MODEL; INTERSTORY DRIFT RATIO; INTERSTORY DRIFTS; LOCAL DEFORMATIONS; NEAR-FAULT; NON-STRUCTURAL DAMAGE; NONLINEAR TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODELS; PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC DESIGN; PULSE-LIKE; RESPONSE MEASURES; SEISMIC CODE PROVISION; SEISMIC DEMANDS; SEISMIC ENGINEERING; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY; SITE CONDITIONS; SOIL CONDITIONS; SPECTRAL DISPLACEMENT; SPECTRAL PARAMETERS; STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; STRUCTURAL DAMAGES; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS; TIME HISTORY;

DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SEISMOLOGY; SPECTROSCOPY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

CORRELATION; CYCLIC LOADING; DEFORMATION; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; VIBRATION;

EID: 79953027334     PISSN: 00334553     EISSN: 14209136     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-010-0118-9     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. AKBAS, B. and SHEN, J. (2002), Energy approach in performancebased earthquake resistant design (PB-EQRD). In 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering Paper Reference 043 (Elsevier, Amsterdam).
2. AKIYAMA, H. (1985), Earthquake-Resistant Limit-State Design for Buildings (University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo).
3. BAZZURRO, P. and CORNELL, C. A. Vector-valued probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (VPSHA). In Proceedings of the Seventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Boston, MA 2002).
4. BERTERO, V. V. and UANG, C.M. Issues and future directions in the use of energy approach for seismic-resistant design of structures. In Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1992), pp. 3-22.
5. BERTERO R. D. and BERTERO V. V. (2002), Performance-based seismic engineering: the need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31, 627-652.
6. BOMMER, J. J. and ELNASHAI, A. S. (1999), Displacement spectra for seismic design, J. Earthq. Eng. 3(1) 1-32, Imperial College Press.
7. BORZI, B., CALVI, G. M., ELNASHAI, A. S., FACCIOLI, E. and BOMMER, J. J. (2001), Inelastic spectra for displacement-based seismic design, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 21, 47-61.
8. CHAI, Y. H. and FAJFAR, P. (2000), A procedure for estimating input energy spectra for seismic design J. Earthq. Eng. 4(4), 539-561.
9. CHAPMAN, M. C. (1999), On the use of elastic input energy for seismic hazard analysis, Earthq. Spectra 15(4), 607-635.
10. CHOU, C. C. and UANG, C. M. (2000), Establishing absorbed energy spectra an attenuation approach, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29, 1441-1455.
11. CHOU, C. C and UANG, C. M. (2003), A procedure for evaluating seismic energy demand of framed structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 229-244.
12. DECANINI, L., MOLLAIOLI, F. and MURA A. Shear-beam model for the prediction of the response of MDOF systems subjected to severe earthquake ground shaking. In 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper 055 (Elsevier Science Ltd., London 2002).
13. DECANINI, L. and MOLLAIOLI, F. (1998), Formulation of elastic earthquake input energy spectra, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27, 1503-1522.
14. DECANINI, L., MOLLAIOLI, F., PANZA, G. F. and ROMANELLI, F. (1999), The realistic definition of the seismic input: an application to the Catania area, In Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures II, (eds. Oliveto G. and Brebbia C. A.) (WIT press, Boston), pp. 425-434.
15. DECANINI, L. D., MOLLAIOLI, F., SARAGONI, R. (2000), Energy and displacement demands Imposed by near-source ground motions, In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, January 29-February 4, (New Zealand, 2000), paper 1136/6/A.
16. DECANINI, L., LIBERATORE, L. and MOLLAIOLI, F. (2003), Characterization of displacement demand for elastic and inelastic SDOF systems, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 23, 455-471.
17. DECANINI, L. D. and MOLLAIOLI, F. (2001), An energy-based methodology for the assessment of the seismic demand, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 21, 113-137.
18. DECANINI, L., MOLLAIOLI, F. and MURA, A. Simplified shear-type model for the evaluation of the influence of ductility and stiffness distribution patterns on multi-story structures, In XI Italian National Conference "L'ingegneria Sismica in Italia", (Genova, Italy, January 25-29 2004).
19. ESTES, K. R. and ANDERSON, J.C. (2002), Hysteretic energy demands in multistory buildings. In 7th US NCEE (Boston). EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute), Oakland.
20. FAJFAR, P. (1992), Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low-cycle fatigue, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 21, 837-848.
21. FAJFAR, P. and GASPERSIC, P. (1996), The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25, 31-46.
22. FAJFAR, P. and VIDIC, T. (1994), Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energy, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23, 523-537.
23. GHOSH, S., COLLINS, K. R. (2002), Application of uniform hazard energy spectra in reliability based seismic design. In 7th US NCEE (Boston) EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute), Oakland.
24. GUPTA, A. and KRAWINKLER, H. (2000), Estimation of seismic drift demands for frame structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29, 1287-1305.
25. HAO, T. Y. (2002), Energy of earthquake response: Recent developments, ISET J. Earthq. Technol. Paper No. 416, 39(1-2), 21-53.
26. HORI, N. and INOUE, N. (2002), Damaging properties of ground motions and prediction of maximum response of structures based on momentary energy response Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31, 1657-1679.
27. KALKAN, E. and KUNNATH, S. K. (2007), Effective cyclic energy as a measure of seismic demand, J. Earthq. Eng. 11(5), 725-751.
28. KALKAN, E. and KUNNATH, S. K. (2008), Relevance of absolute and relative energy content in seismic evaluation of structures, Adv. Struct. Eng. 11(1), 1-18.
29. KRAWINKLER, H., MEDINA, R., MIRANDA, M. and AYOUB, A. (1999), Seismic demands for performance-based design. In Proceedings of the U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, PEER Report 1999/10 (September 13, Maui, Hawaii).
30. KRAWINKLER, H., MEDINA, R. and ALAVI, B. (2003), Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on ground motions, Eng. Struct. 25, 637-653.
31. LEELATAVIWAT, S., GOEL, S. C. and STOJADINOVIC, B. (1999), Toward performance-based seismic design of structures. Earthq. Spectra 15(3), 435-461.
32. LEELATAVIWAT, S., GOEL, S. C. and STOJADINOVIC, B. (2002), Energy-based seismic design of structures using yield mechanism and target drift, J. Struct. Eng. 128(8), 1046-1054.
33. LEELATAVIWAT, S., SAEWON, W. and GOEL, S.C. (2009), Application of energy balance concept in seismic evaluation of structures, J. Struct. Eng. 135(2), 113-121.
34. LUCO, N., MANUEL, L., BALDAVA, S. and BAZZURRO, P. (2005), Correlation of damage of steel moment-resisting frames to a vector-valued ground motion parameter set that includes energy demands, In USGS Award Final Report. (http://erpweb.er.usgs.gov/reports/abstract/2003/sc/03hqgr0057.pdf).
35. MANFREDI, G. (2001), Evaluation of seismic energy demand, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 485-499.
36. MIRANDA, E. (2000), Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 126(10), 1150-1159.
37. MIRANDA, E. (2001), Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 127(9), 1005-1012.
38. MIRANDA, E. and ASLANI, H. (2002), Approximate peak interstory drift demands in buildings during earthquakes, In 7th US NCEE (Boston).
39. MOLLAIOLI, F., BRUNO, S., DECANINI, L. and PANZA, G. F. (2006), Characterization of the dynamical response of structures to damaging pulse-type near-fault ground motions, Meccanica 41, 23-46.
40. MURA A. (2003), Sulla valutazione del potenziale di danno in termini di spostamenti e di energia sui sistemi a piúgradi di libertá soggetti ad eccitazione sismica (in Italian), Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy.
41. NASSAR, A. A. and KRAWINKLER H. (1991), Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. In John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Report No. 95, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.
42. ORDAZ, M., HUERTA, B. and REINOSO E. (2003), Exact computation of input-energy spectra from Fourier amplitude spectra, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 597-605.
43. PANZA, G. F., ROMANELLI, F. and VACCARI F. (2000), Realistic modelling of waveforms in laterally heterogeneous anelastic media by modal summation, Geophys. J. Int. 143, 1-20.
44. PANZA, G. F., ROMANELLI, F. and VACCARI, F. (2001), Seismic wave propagation in laterally heterogeneous anelastic media: theory and applications to the seismic zonation, Adv. Geophys. Academic press, 43, 1-95.
45. PANZA, G. F., ROMANELLI, F., VACCARI, F., DECANINI, L. and MOLLAIOLI, F. (2003a), Perspectives of innovative approaches in seismic hazard evaluation. In SEE4 Fourth International Conference of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 12-14 May 2003 Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran (CD).
46. PANZA, G. F., ROMANELLI, F., VACCARI, F., DECANINI, L. and MOLLAIOLI, F. (2003b), Seismic ground motion modelling and damage earthquake scenarios: A bridge between seismologist and seismic engineers. In OECD/NEA Workshop on The Relation between Seismological Data and Seismic Engineering, 16-18 October 2002, Istanbul Turkey, NEA/CSNI/R(2003)18, 241-266.
47. PRIESTLEY, M. J. N. and CALVI, G. M. (1997), Concepts and procedures for direct displacement-based design and assessment. In Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes (eds. FAJFAR and KRAWINKLER) (Balkema, Rotterdam 1997).
48. REINOSO, E., HUERTA, B. and ORDAZ, M. (2002), Energy of strong ground motion and structural response. In 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper Reference 160 (Elsevier Science Ltd., London).
49. RIDDELL, R. and GARCIA, J. E. (2002), Hysteretic energy spectrum and earthquake damage. In 7th US NCEE (Boston).
50. SENEVIRATNA, G. D. P. K. and KRAWINKLER, H. (1997), Evaluation of inelastic MDOF effects for seismic design, (ed. John A. Blume) Earthquake Engineering Center Report No. 120, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.
51. SHEN, J. and AKBAS, B. (1999), Seismic energy demand in steel moment frames, J. Earthq. Eng. 3(4), 519-559.
52. TERAN-GILMORE, A. (1996), Performance-based earthquake-resistant design of framed buildings using energy concepts, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, 1996.
53. TERAN-GILMORE, A. (1998), A parametric approach to performance-based numerical seismic design, Earthq. Spectra 14, 3.
54. TRIFUNAC, M. D. (2008), Energy of strong motion at earthquake source, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 28, 1-6.
55. WHITTAKER, A., CONSTANTINOU, M. and TSOPELAS, P. (1998), Displacement estimates for performance-based seismic design, ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 124(8), 905-912.