Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage

Journal of Urology

Volumn 184, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1341-1346

  Budäus, Lars ^a,b   Isbarn, Hendrik ^a,b   Eichelberg, Christian ^a   Lughezzani, Giovanni ^b,c   Sun, Maxine ^b   Perrotte, Paul ^b   Chun, Felix K H ^a   Salomon, Georg ^a   Steuber, Thomas ^a   Köllermann, Jens ^a   Sauter, Guido ^a   Ahyai, Sascha A ^a   Zacharias, Mario ^a   Fisch, Margit ^a   Schlomm, Thorsten ^a   Haese, Alexander ^a   Heinzer, Hans ^a   Huland, Hartwig ^a   Montorsi, Francesco ^c   Graefen, Markus ^a   Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^b   more..

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

pathology; prostate; prostate specific antigen; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; surgical

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE SURGERY; SURVIVAL RATE; BLOOD; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

ADULT; AGED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

EID: 79952984784     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J.I. Epstein, M. Amin, and L. Boccon-Gibod Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens Scand J Urol Nephrol 216 suppl. 2005 34
2. O. Yossepowitch, A. Bjartell, and J.A. Eastham Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences Eur Urol 55 2009 87
3. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and W. Artibani Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies Eur Urol 55 2009 1037
4. J. Walz, F.K. Chun, and E.A. Klein Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer J Urol 181 2009 601
5. P.I. Karakiewicz, J.A. Eastham, and M. Graefen Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients Urology 66 2005 1245
6. A.N. Vis, F.H. Schroder, and T.H. van derKwast The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer Eur Urol 50 2006 258
7. S. Shikanov, J. Song, and C. Royce Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence J Urol 182 2009 139
8. P. Swindle, J.A. Eastham, and M. Ohori Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens J Urol 179 2008 S47
9. J.A. Eastham, K. Kuroiwa, and M. Ohori Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens Urology 70 2007 965
10. J. Pfitzenmaier, S. Pahernik, and T. Tremmel Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? BJU Int 102 2008 1413
11. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, and S. Secco Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy J Urol 182 2009 2682
12. M. Sofer, K.L. Hamilton-Nelson, and F. Civantos Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression J Urol 167 2002 2453
13. R.J. Palisaar, J. Noldus, and M. Graefen Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure Eur Urol 47 2005 176
14. F.H. Schroder, J. Hugosson, and M.J. Roobol Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study N Engl J Med 360 2009 1320
15. A. Briganti, F.K. Chun, and A. Salonia Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy Urology 69 2007 147
16. A. Briganti, F.K. Chun, and A. Salonia Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer BJU Int 98 2006 788
17. A. Haese, J.I. Epstein, and H. Huland Validation of a biopsy-based pathologic algorithm for predicting lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma Cancer 95 2002 1016
18. S. Conrad, M. Graefen, and U. Pichlmeier Systematic sextant biopsies improve preoperative prediction of pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma J Urol 159 1998 2023
19. F.C. Burkhard, and U.E. Studer The role of lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer Urol Oncol 22 2004 198
20. J.E. McNeal, E.A. Redwine, and F.S. Freiha Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread Am J Surg Pathol 12 1988 897
21. D.F. Gleason, and G.T. Mellinger Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging J Urol 111 1974 58
22. L. Budaus, H. Isbarn, and T. Schlomm Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy Eur Urol 56 2009 317
23. R.A. Marks, M.O. Koch, and A. Lopez-Beltran The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens Hum Pathol 38 2007 1207
24. J.I. Epstein, G. Pizov, and P.C. Walsh Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy Cancer 71 1993 3582
25. S. Shikanov, H. Al-Ahmadie, and C. Royce Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence J Urol 182 2009 139
26. H. Aydin, T. Tsuzuki, and D. Hernandez Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression Urology 64 2004 551
27. M.L. Blute, D.G. Bostwick, and E.J. Bergstralh Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy Urology 50 1997 733
28. M. Bolla, H. van Poppel, and L. Collette Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911) Lancet 366 2005 572
29. J.W. Moul Post-radical prostatectomy management options for positive surgical margins: argument for observation Urol Oncol 27 2009 92
30. A. Ochiai, T. Sotelo, and P. Troncoso Natural history of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy based on length of a positive margin Urology 71 2008 308