Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression

Urology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 551-555

  Aydin, Hakan ^a   Tsuzuki, Toyonori ^b   Hernandez, David ^c   Walsh, Patrick C ^c   Partin, Alan W ^c   Epstein, Jonathan I ^c  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NAGOYA DAINI RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER NECK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS; ADENOCARCINOMA; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; HUMANS; LIFE TABLES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 4444306829     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sofer M., Hamilton-Nelson K.L., Civantos F., et al. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy the influence of site and number on progression. J Urol. 167:2002;2453-2456
2. Watson R.B., Civantos F., Soloway M.S. Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy detailed pathological analysis and prognosis. Urology. 48:1996;80-90
3. Roberts W.W., Bergstralh E.J., Blute M.L., et al. Contemporary identification of patients at high risk of early prostate cancer recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 57:2001;1033-1037
4. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B., et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 154:1995;131-138
5. Blute M.L., Bostwick D.G., Seay T.M., et al. Pathologic classification of prostate carcinoma the impact of margin status. Cancer. 82:1998;902-908
6. Epstein J.I., Partin A.W., Sauvageot J., et al. Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy a multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 20:1996;286-292
7. Wieder J.A., Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 160:1998;299-315
8. Epstein J.I. Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Clin North Am. 23:1996;651-663
9. Yossepowitch O., Sircar K., Scardino P.T., et al. Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. J Urol. 168:2002;2011-2015
10. Yossepowitch O., Engelstein D., Konichezky M., et al. Bladder neck involvement at radical prostatectomy positive margins or advanced T4 disease? Urology. 56:2000;448-452
11. Obek C., Sadek S., Lai S., et al. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. Urology. 54:1999;682-688
12. Dash A., Sanda M.G., Yu M., et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Prostate cancer involving the bladder neck recurrence-free survival and implications for AJCC staging modification. Urology. 60:2002;276-280
13. Walsh PC: Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy, in Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, et al (Eds):Campbell's Urology, 8th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2002, pp 3107-3129
14. Moul J.W., Connelly R.R., Lubeck D.P., et al. Predicting risk of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy with the Center for Prostate Disease Research and Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor databases. J Urol. 166:2001;1322-1327
15. Kattan M.W., Wheeler T.M., Scardino P.T. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 17:1999;1499-1507
16. Catalona W.J., Smith D.S. 5-year tumor recurrence rates after anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 152:1994;1837-1842
17. Ohori M., Wheeler T.M., Kattan M.W., et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol. 154:1995;1818-1824
18. Blute M.L., Bostwick D.G., Bergstralh E.J., et al. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 50:1997;733-739