A computationally efficient OMP-based compressed sensing reconstruction for dynamic MRI

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 7, 2011, Pages

  Usman, M ^a   Prieto, C ^a   Odille, F ^b   Atkinson, D ^b   Schaeffter, T ^a   Batchelor, P G ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIAC MR; COMPRESSED SENSING; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; DATA SETS; DYNAMIC MRI; ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS; FIELD OF VIEWS; IMAGING DATA; NUMERICAL PHANTOMS; ORTHOGONAL MATCHING PURSUIT; SLIDING WINDOW; SPACE IMAGE; SPEED-UP FACTORS;

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; IMAGE MATCHING; SIGNAL RECONSTRUCTION;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

ARTICLE; HEART; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TIME;

HEART; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79952980546     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/7/N02     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Blumensath T and Davies M E 2009 Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 27 265-74
2. Candes E 2006 Compressive sampling Proc. Int. Congress of Mathematicians (Madrid, Spain) pp 1433-52
3. d'Arcy J A, Collins D J, Rowland I J, Padhani A R and Leach M O 2002 Applications of sliding window reconstruction with cartesian sampling for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI NMR Biomed. 15 174-83 (Pubitemid 34213407)
4. Dai W and Milenkovic O 2009 Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55 2230-49
5. Donoho D L 2006 Compressed sensing IEEE Trans. Info. Theory. 52 1289-306
6. Gamper U, Boesiger P and Kozerke S 2008 Compressed sensing in dynamic MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 59 365-73 (Pubitemid 351220100)
7. Jung H, Sung K, Nayak K S, Kim E Y and Ye J C 2009 k-t FOCUSS: a general compressed sensing framework for high resolution dynamic MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 61 103-16
8. Jung H, Ye J C and Kim E Y 2007 Improved k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE using FOCUSS Phys. Med. Biol. 52 3201-26 (Pubitemid 46795256)
9. Kunis S and Rauhut H 2008 Random sampling of sparse trigonometric polynomials: II. Orthogonal matching pursuit versus basis pursuit Found. Comput. Math. 8 737-63
10. Lustig M, Alley M, Vasanawala S, Donoho D L and Pauly J M 2009 L1 SPIR-iT: autocalibrating parallel imaging compressed sensing Int. Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM '09) (Hawaii, USA) p379
11. Lustig M, Donoho D and Pauly J M 2007 Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging Magn. Reson. Med. 58 1182-95 (Pubitemid 350234205)
12. Madore B, Glover G H and Pelc N J 1999 Unaliasing by Fourier-encoding the overlaps using the temporal dimension (UNFOLD), applied to cardiac imaging and fMRI Magn. Reson. Med. 42 813-28 (Pubitemid 29521471)
13. Needell D and Tropp J A 2009 CoSaMP: iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 26 301-21
14. Needell D and Vershynin R 2010 Signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements via regularized orthogonal matching pursuit IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 4 310-6
15. Rooney W 2003 MRI: from picture to proton Health Phys. 85 504-5
16. Tropp J A and Gilbert A C 2007 Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 53 4655-66
17. Tsao J, Boesiger P and Pruessmann K P 2003 k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations Magn. Reson. Med. 50 1031-42 (Pubitemid 37356583)
18. Vanvaals J J, Brummer M E, Dixon W T, Tuithof H H, Engels H, Nelson R C, Gerety B M, Chezmar J L and Denboer J A 1993 Keyhole method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 3 671-5