Exploring the impact of usefulness and enjoyment on mobile service acceptance: A comparative study

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Niklas, Susanne J B ^a   Strohmeier, Stefan ^b  

^a RHEINMAIN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; CUSTOMER VALUES; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; MOBILE SERVICE; MOBILE SYSTEMS; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION; PRECISE MODELING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USAGE INTENTION;

SYSTEMS SCIENCE; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 79952978220     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.202     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. Agarwal, R., Prasad, J. (1997): The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies, Decision Sciences, 28/3, 557-582.
2. Agarwal, R., Prasad, J. (1998): A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology, Information Systems Research, 9/2, 204-215.
3. Aldás-Manzano, J., Ruiz-Mafé, C., Sanz-Blas, S. (2009): Exploring Individual Personality Factors as Drivers of M-shopping Acceptance, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109/6, 739-757.
4. Anckar, B., D'Incau, D. (2002): Value-Added Services in Mobile Commerce: An Analytical Framework and Empirical Findings from a National Consumer Survey, Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
5. Bagozzi, R. P. (2007): The Legacy of the TAM and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8/4, 244-245.
6. Benbasat, I., Barki, H. (2007): Quo Vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8/4, 211-218.
7. Bruner, G. C., Kumar, A. (2005): Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices, Journal of Business Research, 58/5, 554-558.
8. Chin, W. (1998): Issues and Opinions on Structural Equation Modeling, MIS Quarterly, 22/1, 1-11.
9. Chin, W., Marcolin, B. L., Newsted Peter R. (1996): A Partial Leas Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Information Systems.
10. Davis, F. D. (1989): Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13/3, 319-340.
11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R. (1989): User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35/8, 982-1003.
12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R. (1992): Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22/14, 1111-1132.
13. Diamantopoulos, A., Winklhofer, H. (2001): Index Construction with Formative Indicators, Journal of Marketing Research, 38/2, 269-277.
14. Dushinski, K. (2009), The mobile marketing handbook: A step-by-step guide to creating dynamic mobile marketing campaigns. Medford N.J. CyberAge Books/Information Today.
15. EITO (2009), More than four billion mobile phone users worldwide. Berlin, Germany. http://www.eito. com/reposi/PressReleases/eito-pr-20090807.pdf.
16. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley series in social psychology. Reading, Mass. Addison-Wesley.
17. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W. (2003): Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model, MIS Quarterly, 27/1, 51-90.
18. Goodhue, D. L. (1995): Understanding User Evaluation of Information Systems, Management Science, 41/12, 1827-1844.
19. Heijden, H. (2004): User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, 28/4, 695-704.
20. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., Sinkovics, R. R. (2009): The Use of Partial Least Square Path Modeling in International Marketing, Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-320.
21. JAIS (2007): Special Issue on "Quo Vadis TAM", Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8/4.
22. Jarvis, C., MacKenzie, S., Podsakoff, P. (2003): A Critical Review of Construct Indicators & Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199-218. (Pubitemid 37374305)
23. Kaasinen, E. (2005), User acceptance of mobile services: Value, ease of use, trust and ease of adoption, Univ., Diss. - Tampere, 2005. VTT publications.
24. Kargin, B., Basoglu, N., Daim, T. (2009): Exploring Mobile Service Adoption: Customer Preferences, Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
25. Kats, R. (2010), Mobile driving evolution of airline business. http://www.mobilemarketer.com/cms/news/ software-technology/5992.html.
26. Kim, G. S., Park, S.-B., Oh, J. (2008): An examination of factors influencing consumer adoption of short message service (SMS), Psychology & Marketing, 25/8, 769-786.
27. Kleijnen, M., Weztles, M., Ruyter, K. de (2004): Consumer acceptance of wireless finance, Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8/3, 206-217.
28. Kuo, Y.-F., Yen, S.-N. (2009): Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value-added services, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 103-110.
29. Lee, T. (2005): The Impact of Perceptions of Interactivity on Customer Trust and Transaction Intentions in Mobile Commerce, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6/3, 165-180.
30. Lee, T., Jun, J. (2007): Contextual perceived value?, Business Process Management, 13/6, 798-814.
31. Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., Larsen Kai R.T. (2003): The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 752-780.
32. Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P. (2003): Why do People Use Information Technology? A Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model, Information & Management, 40/3, 191-204. (Pubitemid 35412508)
33. Lu, J., Yao, J. E., Yu, C.-S. (2005): Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14/3,245-268. (Pubitemid 41400614)
34. Lu, Y., Deng, Z., Wang, B. (2010): Exploring factors affecting Chinese consumers' usage of SMS Service for personal Communication, Info Systems, 20/2, 183-208.
35. Lubbe, B., Louw, L. (2010): The perceived value of mobile devices to passengers across the airline travel activity chain, Journal of Air Transport Management, 16/1, 12-15.
36. Mahfouz, A. Y. (2009): Contemporary Information Systems Alternative Models to TAM: A Theoretical Perspective, Handbook of research on contemporary theoretical models in information systems, ed. Yogesh K. et al., 229-41. Information Science Reference.
37. Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V. K., Öörni, A. (2006): The Impact of Use Situation and Mobility on the Acceptance of Mobile Ticketing Services, Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
38. Massey, A., Khatri, V., Ramesh, V. (2005): From the Web to the Wireless Web: Technology Readiness and Usability, Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-10.
39. Okazaki, S., Skapa, R., Grande, I. (2008): Capturing Global Youth: Mobile Gaming in th U.S., Spain, and the Czech Republic, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications, 13, 827-855.
40. Pew Internet (04.2009), Mobile internet use increases sharply in 2009 http://www.pewinternet.org/ Press-Releases/2009/Mobile-internet-use.aspx.
41. Pric, M. (2006): Mobile service and phone as consumption system, Proceedings of Helsinki Mobility Roundtable.
42. Qingxiong, M., Liu, L. (2004): The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16/1, 59-72.
43. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., Will, A. (2005), SmartPLS, 2.0th ed. University of Hamburg, Germany.
44. Rogers, E. M. (2003), Diffusion of innovations, 5. ed. New York: Free Press.
45. Vatanparast, R., Butt, A. H. (2009): Factors Affecting Use of Mobile Advertising: A Quantitative Study, Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
46. Venkatesh, V. (2000): Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating control, Intrinsic Motivation, an Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model, Information Systems Research, 11/4, 342-365.
47. Venkatesh, V. (2006): Where to Go From Here? Thoughts on Future Directions for Research on Individual-Level Technology Adoption with a Focus on Decision Making, Decision Sciences, 37/4, 497-518.
48. Venkatesh, V., Bala, H. (2008): Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions, Decision Sciences, 39/2, 273-315.
49. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D. (2000): A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model, Management Science, 46/2, 186-204.
50. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F. D. (2003): User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 27/3, 425-478.
51. Wang, C.-C., Lo, A.-K., Fang, W. (2008): Extending the technology acceptance model to mobile telecommunication innovation, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7/2, 101-110.
52. Wang, Y.-S., Lin, H.-H., Luran, P. (2006): Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service, Information Systems Journal, 16/2, 157-179. (Pubitemid 43344989)
53. Wixom, B. H., Todd, P. A. (2005): A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance, Information Systems Research, 16, 85-102. (Pubitemid 40701110)
54. Zhang, J., Mao, E. (2008): Understanding the Acceptance of Mobile SMS Advertising among Young Chinese Consumers, Psychology & Marketing, 25, 787-805.