A longitudinal study of remodeling in a revised peripheral artery bypass graft using 3D ultrasound imaging and computational hemodynamics

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  McGah, Patrick M ^a   Leotta, Daniel F ^b   Beach, Kirk W ^c   Riley, James J ^a   Aliseda, Alberto ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3-D ULTRASOUND; 3D ULTRASOUND IMAGING; BYPASS GRAFT; COMPUTATIONAL HEMODYNAMICS; FLOW DYNAMICS; FLOW FEATURES; GRAFT FAILURE; HIGH FREQUENCY; IN-VIVO; JET IMPINGEMENT; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; PERIPHERAL ARTERIES; PRESSURE FLUCTUATION; RECIRCULATION REGIONS; REDUCTION IN AREA; SMOOTH MUSCLE CELL PROLIFERATION; VELOCIMETRY;

CELL PROLIFERATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MUSCLE; SHEAR STRESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; ULTRASONICS;

GRAFTING (CHEMICAL);

ARTERY BYPASS; ARTERY DILATATION; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMORAL ARTERY; GRAFT FAILURE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; POPLITEAL ARTERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; BLOOD VESSEL GRAFT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENOSIS, OCCLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; VASCULAR GRAFTING;

EID: 79952858775     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4003622     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Conte M.S. Results of Prevent III: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Edifolidge for the Prevention of Vein Graft Failure in Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery. J. Vasc. Surg. 2006, 43(4):742-751. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.058.
2. Goodney P.P. Beck A.W. Nagle J. Welch H.G. Zwolak R.M. National Trends in Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery, Endovascular Interventions, and Major Amputations. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009, 50(1):54-60. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.01.035.
3. Mills J.L. Bandyk D.F. Gahtan V. Esses G.E. The Origin of Infrainguinal Vein Graft Stenosis: A Prospective Study Based on Duplex Surveillance. J. Vasc. Surg. 1995, 21(1):16-25. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70240-7.
4. Watson H.R. Buth J. Schroeder T.V. Simms M.H. Horrocks M. Incidence of Stenoses in Femorodistal Bypass Vein Grafts in a Mulicentre Study. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc Surg. 2000, 20:67-71. ZZZZZZ, 1078-5884, 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1135.
5. Owens C.D. Rybicki F.J. Wake N. Schanzer A. Mitsouras D. Gerhard-Herman M.D. Conte M.S. Early Remodeling of Lower Extremity Vein Grafts: Inflammation Influences Biomechanical Adaptation. J. Vasc. Surg. 2008, 47(6):1235-1242. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.009.
6. Fillinger M.F. Cronenwett J.L. Besso S. Walsh D.B. Zwolak R.M. Vein Adaption to the Hemodynamic Environment of Infrainguinal Grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 1994, 19:970-978. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214.
7. Owens C.D. Wake N. Jacot J.G. Gerhard-Herman M. Gaccionce P. Belkin M. Creager M.A. Conte M.S. Early Biomechanical Changes in Lower Exremity Vein Grafts-Distinct Temporal Phases of Remodeling and Wall Stiffness. J. Vasc. Surg. 2006, 44(4):740-746. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.005.
8. Galt S.W. Zwolak R.M. Wagner R.J. Gillbertson J.J. Differential Response of Arteries and Vein Grafts to Blood Flow Reduction. J. Vasc. Surg. 1993, 17(3):563-570. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1067/mva.1993.39147.
9. Dobrin P.B. Mechanical Factors Associated With the Development of Intimal and Medial Thickening in Vein Grafts Subjected to Arterial Pressure. Hypertension 1995, 26:38-43. HPRTDN, 0194-911X.
10. Lemson M.S. Tordoir J.H. M. Daemen M.J. A. P. Kitslaar P.J. E. H. M. Intimal Hyperplasia in Vascular Grafts. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc Surg. 2000, 19:336-350. ZZZZZZ, 1078-5884, 10.1053/ejvs.1999.1040.
11. Kohler T.R. Kirkman T.R. Kraiss L.W. Zierler B.K. Clowes A.W. Increased Blood Flow Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia in Endothelialized Vascular Grafts. Circ. Res. 1991, 69:1557-1565. CIRUAL, 0009-7330.
12. Bassiouny H.S. White S. Glagov S. Choi E. Giddens D.P. Zarins C.K. Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia: Mechanical Injury or Flow Induced. J. Vasc. Surg. 1992, 15(4):708-717. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1067/mva.1992.33849.
13. Meyerson S.L. Skelly C.L. Curi M.A. Shakur U.M. Vosicky J.E. Glagov S. Christen T. Gabbiani G. Schwartz L.B. The Effects of Extremely Low Shear Stress on Cellular Proliferation and Neointimal Thickening in the Failing Bypass Graft. J. Vasc. Surg. 2001, 34(1):90-97. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1067/mva.2001.114819.
14. Jiang Z. Wu L. Miller B.L. Goldman D.R. Fernandez C.M. Abouhamze Z.S. Ozaki C.K. Berceli S.A. A Novel Vein Graft Model: Adaption to Differential Flow Environments. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 286:240-245. ZZZZZZ, 0363-6135, 10.1152/ajpheart.00760.2003.
15. DePaola N. Gimbrone Jr. M.A. Davies P.F. Dewey Jr. C.F. Vascular Endothelium Responds to Fluid Shear Stress Gradients. Arterioscler., Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1992, 12:1254-1257. and pp.
16. White C.R. Haidekker M. Bao X. Frangos J.A. Temporal Gradients in Shear, But Not Spatial Gradients, Stimulate Endothelial Cell Proliferation. Circulation 2001, 103:2508-2513. CIRCAZ, 0009-7322.
17. Carroll G.T. McGloughlin T.M. O'Keefee L.M. Callanan A. Realistic Temporal Variations of Shear Stress Modulate mmp-2 and mcp-1 Expression in Arteriovenous Vascular Grafts. Cell Mol Bioengr 2009, 2(4):591-605. 10.1007/s12195-009-0089-z.
18. Owens C.D. Adaptive Changes in Autogenous Vein Grafts for Arterial Reconstruction: Clinical Implications. J. Vasc. Surg. 2010, 51(3):736-746. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.102.
19. Leotta D.F. Primozich J.F. Beach K.W. Bergelin R.O. Zierler R.E. Strandness Jr. D.E. Remodeling in Peripheral Vein Graft Revisions: Serial Study With Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging. J. Vasc. Surg. 2003, 37(4):798-807. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1067/mva.2003.137.
20. Loth F. Fischer P.F. Bassiouny H.S. Blood Flow in End-to-Side Anastomoses. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2008, 40:367-393. ARVFA3, 0066-4189, 10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102119.
21. Lei M. Archie J.P. Kleinsteuer C. Computational Design of a Bypass Graft That Minimizes Wall Shear Stress Gradients in the Region of the Distal Anastomosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 1997, 25(4):637-646. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70289-1.
22. Lei M. Giddens D.P. Jones S.A. Loth F. Bassiouny H. Pulsatile Flow in and End-to-Side Vascular Graft Model: Comparison of Computations With Experimental Data. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2001, 123:80-87. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.1336145.
23. Walsh M.T. Kavanagh E.G. O'Brien T. Grace P.A. McGloughlin T. On the Existence of an Optimum End-to-Side Junctional Geometry in Peripheral Bypass Surgery-A Computer Generated Study. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc Surg. 2003, 26:649-656. ZZZZZZ, 1078-5884, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.08.004.
24. O'Brien T.P. Grace P. Walsh M. Burke P. McGloughlin T. Computational Investigations of a New Prosthetic Femoral-Popliteal Bypass Graft Design. J. Vasc. Surg. 2005, 42:1169-1175. ZZZZZZ, 0741-5214, 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.08.016.
25. Moore J.A. Steinman D.A. Prakash S. Johnston K.W. Ethier C.R. A Numerical Study of Blood Flow Patterns in Anatomically Realistic and Simplified End-to-Side Anastomoses. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 1999, 121:265-272. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.2798319.
26. Giordana S. Sherwin S.J. Peiró J. Doorly D.J. Crane J.S. Lee K.E. Cheshire N.J. W. Caro C.G. Local and Global Geometric Influence on Steady Flow in Distal Anastomoses of Peripheral Bypass Grafts. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127:1087-1098. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.2073507.
27. Jackson M. Wood N.B. Zhao S. Augst A. Wolfe J.H. Gedroyc W.M. W. Hughes A.D. Thom S.A. M. Xu X.Y. Low Wall Shear Stress Predicts Subsequent Development of Wall Hypertrophy in Lower Limb Bypass Grafts. Artery Res. 2009, 3:32-38. 10.1016/j.artres.2009.01.001.
28. Leotta D.F. Primozich J.F. Beach K.W. Bergelin R.O. Eugene D. Strandess J. Serial Measurement of Cross-Sectional Area in Peripheral Vein Grafts Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2001, 27(1):61-68. USMBA3, 0301-5629, 10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00296-9.
29. 2009, Ansys, Inc., ANSYS®FLUENT®, release 12.1 ed.
30. Lee S.-.W. Steinman D.A. On the Relative Importance of Rheology for Image-Based CFD Models of the Carotid Bifurcation. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2007, 129(2):273-279. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.2540836.
31. Womersley J.R. Method for the Calculation of Velocity, Rate of Flow and Viscous Drag in Arteries When the Pressure Gradient Is Known. J. Physiol. 1955, 127:553-563. pp.
32. Cantón G. Levy D.I. Lasheras J.C. Hemodynamic Changes Due to Stent Placement in Bifurcating Intracranial Aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 2005, 103(1):146-155. JONSAC, 0022-3085, 10.3171/jns.2005.103.1.0146.
33. Lee S.-.W. Antiga L. Steinman D.A. Correlations Among Indicators of Disturbed Flow at the Normal Carotid Bifurcation. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2009, 131(6):061013. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.3127252.
34. He X. Ku D.N. Pulsatile Flow in the Human Left Coronary Artery Bifurcation: Average Conditions. ASMEJ. Biomech. Eng. 1996, 118:74-82. 10.1115/1.2795948.
35. Fung Y.C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues 1993, Springer, New York.
36. Stroud J.S. Berger S.A. Saloner D. Influence of Stenosis Morphology on Flow Through Severely Stenotic Vessels: Implications for Plaque Rupture. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:443-455. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00207-9.
37. Roach M.R. An Experimental Study of the Production and Time Course of Poststenotic Dilatation in the Femoral and Carotid Arteries of Adult Dogs. Circ. Res. 1963, 13:537-551. CIRUAL, 0009-7330.
38. Ojha M. Langille B.L. Evidence that Turbulence Is Not the Cause of Poststenotic Dilatation in Rabbit Carotid Arteries. Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol. 1993, 13:977-984. ATVBFA, 1079-5642.