Blood flow in end-to-side anastomoses

Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 40, Issue , 2008, Pages 367-393

  Loth, Francis ^a   Fischer, Paul F ^b   Bassiouny, Hisham S ^c  

^a University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

^b ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Arterial bypass graft; Arteriovenous graft; Hemodynamics; Transitional flow; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS); FLOW PATTERNS; FLUID DYNAMICS; GEOMETRY; GRAFTS; OPTIMIZATION; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; TRANSITION FLOW; TURBULENT FLOW; WALL FLOW;

BIOMECHANICAL FORCE; BLOOD FLOW;

HEMODYNAMICS;

BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS); FLOW PATTERNS; FLUID DYNAMICS; GEOMETRY; GRAFTS; HEMODYNAMICS; OPTIMIZATION; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; TRANSITION FLOW; TURBULENT FLOW; WALL FLOW;

BIFURCATION; BIOMETRY; BLOOD; FLOW MODELING; SHEAR STRESS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLOW; TURBULENT FLOW;

EID: 39049111638     PISSN: 00664189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102119     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Bassiouny HS, White S, Glagov S, Choi E, Giddens DP, Zarins CK. 1992. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: mechanical injury or flow induced. J. Vasc. Surg. 15:708-16; discussion T16-17
2. Binns RL, Ku DN, Stewart MT, Ansley JP, Coyle KA. 1989. Optimal graft diameter: effect of wall shear stress on vascular healing. J. Vasc. Surg. 10: 326-37
3. Caro CG, Cheshire NJ, Watkins N. 2005. Preliminary comparative study of small amplitude helical and conventional ePTFE arteriovenous shunts in pigs. J. R. Soc. Interface 2:261-66
4. Caro CG, Doorly DJ, Tarnawski M, Scott KT, Long Q, Dumoulin CL. 1996. Non-planar curvature and branching of arteries and non-planar-type flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser A. 452:185-97
5. Chen J, Lu X, Wang W. 2006. Non-Newtonian effects of blood flow on hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses. J. Biomech. 39:1983-95
6. Crawshaw HM, Quist WC, Serallach E, Valeri CR, LoGerfo FW. 1980. Flow disturbance at the distal end-to-side anastomosis: effect of patency of the proximal outflow segment and angle of anastomosis. Arch. Surg. 115:1280-84
7. Davies PF. 1995. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol. Rev. 75:519-60
8. DePaola N, Gimbrone MAJ, Davies PF, Dewey CFJ. 1992. Vascular endothelium responds to fluid shear stress gradients. Arterioscler Thromb. 12:1254-57
9. Duraiswamy N, Schoephoerster RT, Moreno MR, Moore J, James E. 2007. Stented artery flow patterns and their effects on the artery wall. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39:357-82
10. Echave V, Koornick AR, Haimov M, Jacobson JH. 1979. Intimal hyperplasia as a complication of the use of the polytetrafluoroethylene graft for femoral-popliteal bypass. Surgery 86:791-98
11. Ethier RC, Prakash S, Steinman DA, Leask RL, Couch GG, Ojha M. 2000. Steady flow separation patterns in a 45 degree junction. J. Fluid Mec. 411:1-38
12. Ethier CR, Steinman DA, Zhang X, Karpik SR, Ojha M. 1998. Flow waveform effects on end-to-side anastomotic flow patterns. J. Biomech. 31:609-17
13. Fillinger MF, Reinitz ER, Schwartz RA, Resetarits DE, Paskanik AM, Bredenberg CE. 1989. Beneficial effects of banding on venous intimal-medial hyperplasia in arteriovenous loop grafts. Am. J. Surg. 158:87-94
14. Fillinger MF, Reinitz ER, Schwartz RA, Resetarits DE, Paskanik AM, et al. 1990. Graft geometry and venous intimal-medial hyperplasia in arteriovenous loop grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 11:556-66
15. Friedman SG. 1988. Alexis Carrel: Jules Verne of cardiovascular surgery. Am. J. Surg. 155:420-24
16. Friedman MH, Bargeron CB, Duncan DD, Hutchins GM, Mark FF. 1992. Effects of arterial compliance and non-Newtonian rheology on correlations between intimal thickness and wall shear. J. Biomech. Eng. 114:317-20
17. Giddens DP, Tang TD, Loth F. 1995. Fluid mechanics of arterial bifurcation. In Biological Flow, ed. MY Jaffrin, C Caro, pp. 51-68. New York. Plenum
18. Giordana S, Sherwin SJ, Peiro J, Doorly DJ, Crane JS, et al. 2005. Local and global geometric influence on steady flow in distal anastomoses of peripheral bypass grafts. J. Biomech. Eng. 127:1087-98
19. Glagov S, Giddens DP, Bassiouny H, Scott W, Zarins CK 1991. Hemodynamic effects and tissue reactions at graft to vein anastmosis for vascular access. In Vascular Access fur Hemodialysis II, ed. BG Sommer, M Henry, pp. 3-20. Chicago: Precept
20. Grevious MA, Loth F, Jones SA, Arslan N, Curi MA, et al. 2003. Technical considerations in the construction of vascular anastomoses. In Biomedical Technology and Devices Handbook, ed. J Moore, G Zouridakis, pp. 1-19. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
21. Gudi SR, Clark CB, Frangos JA. 1996. Fluid flow rapidly activates G proteins in human endothelial cells: involvement of G proteins in mechanochemical signal transduction. Circ. Res. 79:834-39
22. Haruguchi H, Teraoka S. 2003. Intimal hyperplasia and hemodynamic factors in arterial bypass and arteriovenous grafts: a review. J Artif. Organs 6:227-35
23. Hughes PE, How TV. 1996. Effects of geometry and flow division on flow structures in models of the distal. end-to-side anastomosis. J. Biomech. 29:855-72
24. Huijbregts HJ, Blankestijn PJ, Caro CG, Cheshire NJ, Hoedt MT, et al. 2007. A helical PTFE arteriovenous access graft to swirl flow across the distal anastomosis: results of a preliminary clinical study. Eur J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 33:472-75
25. Imparato AM, Bracco A, Kim GE, Zeff R. 1972. Intimal and neointimal fibrous proliferation causing failure of arterial reconstructions. Surgery 72:1007-17
26. Jeong J, Hussain F. 1995. On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285:69-94
27. Jones SA, Giddens DP, Loth F, Zarins CY, Kajiya F, et al. 1997. In-vivo measurements of blood flow velocity profiles in canine ilio-femoral anastomotic bypass grafts. J. Biomech. Eng. 119:30-38
28. Kamiya A, Togawa T. 1980. Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress to flow change in the canine carotid artery. Am. J. Physiol. 139:H14-21
29. Kanterman RY, Vesely TM, Pilgram TK, Guy BW, Windus DW, Picus D. 1995. Dialysis. access grafts: anatomic location of venous stenosis and results of angioplasty. Radiology 195:1359
30. Keynton RS, Evancho, MM, Sims RL, Rodway NV, Gobin A, Rittgers SE. 2001. Intimal hyperplasia and wall shear in arterial bypass graft distal anastomoses: an in vivo model study. J. Biomech. Eng. 123:464-73
31. Keynton RS, Rittgers SE, Slnr MC. 1991. The effect of angle and flow rate upon hemodynamics in distal tascular graft anastomoses: an in vitro model study. Biomech. Eng. 113458-63.
32. Kipshidze N, Dangas G, Tsapenko M, Moses J, Leon MB, et al. 2004. Role of the endothelium in modulating neointimal formation: vasculoprotective approaches to attenuate restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 44:733-39
33. Kohler TR, Kirkman TR, Kraiss LW, Zierler BY, Clowes AW. 1991. Increased blood flow inhibits neointimal ryperplasia in endothelialized vascular grafts. Circ. Res. 69:1557-65
34. Ku DN. 1997. Blood flow in arteries. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29:399-434
35. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S. 1985. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation: positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 5:293-302
36. Ku JP, Elkins Q, Taylor CA. 2005. Comparison of CFD and MRI flow and velocities in an invitro large arte bypass graft model. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33:257-69
37. Lasheras JC. 2007. The biomechanics of arterial aneurysms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39:293-319
38. Lee S, Fischer PF, Loth F, Royston TJ, Grogan JY, Bassiouny HS. 2005. Flow-induced vein-wall vibration in an arteriovenous graft. J. Fluids Struct. 20:837-52
39. Lee S, Smith DS, Loth F, Fischer PF, Bassiouny HS. 2007a. Importance of flow division on transition to turbulence within an arteriovenous graft. J. Biomech. 40:981-92
40. Lee S, Smith DS, Loth F, Fischer PF, Bassiouny HS. 2007b. Numerical and experimental simulation of transitional flow in a blood vessel junction. Numer Heat Transf. 51:1-22
41. Lei M, Archie JP, Kleinstreuer C. 1997. Computational design of a bypass graft that minimizes wall shear ess gradients in the region of the distal anastomosis. J. Vasr. Surg. 25:637-46
42. Lei M, Giddens DP, Jones SA, Loth F, Bassiouny H. 2001. Pulsatile flow in an end-to-side vascular graft model: comparison of computations with experimental data. J. Biomech. Eng. 123:80-87
43. Leuprecht A, Perktold & Prosi M, Berk T, Trubel W, Schima H. 2002. Numerical study of hemodynamics and wall mechanics in distal end-to-side anastomoses of bypass grafts. J. Biomech. Eng. 35:225-36
44. Liu YH, Hung YN, Hsieh HC, Ko PJ. 2006. Impact of cuffed, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene dialysis grafts on graft outlet stenosis. World J. Surg. 30:2290-94
45. LoGerfo FW, Quist WC, Nowak MD, Crawshaw HM, Haudenschild CC. 1983. Downstream anastomotic hyperplasia. A mechanism of failure in dacron arterial grafts. Ann. Surg. 197:479-83
46. Longest PW, Kleinstreuer C, Deanda A. 2005. Numerical simulation of wall shear stress and particle-based hemodynamic parameters in pre-cuffed and streamlined end-to-side anastomoses. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33:1752-66
47. Loth F, Fischer PF, Arslan N, Bertram CD, Lee SE, et al. 2003. Transitional flow at the venous anastomosis of an arteriovenous graft: potential activation of the ERK1/2 mechanotransduction pathway. J. Biomech. Eng. 125:49-61
48. Loth F, Jones SA, Giddens DP, Bassiouny HS, Glagov S, Zarins CK. 1997. Measurements of velocity and wall shear stress inside a PTFE vascular graft model under steady flow conditions. J. Biomech. Eng. 119:187-94
49. Loth F, Jones SA, Zarins C& Giddens DP, Nassar RF, et al. 2002. Relative contribution of wall shear stress and injury in experimental intimal thickening at PTFE end-to-side arterial anastomoses. J. Biomech. Eng. 124:44-51
50. Migliavacca F, Dubini G. 2005. Computational modeling of vascular anastomoses. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 3:235-50
51. Moore JA, Steinman DA, Prakash S, Johnston KW, Ethier CR. 1999. A numerical study of blood flow patterns in anatomically realistic and simplified end-to-side anastomoses. J. Biontech. Eng. 121:265-72
52. O'Brien T, Walsh M, McGloughlin T. 2006. Altering end-to-side anastomosis junction hemodynamics: the effects of flow-splitting. Med. Eng. Phys. 28:727-33
53. Ojha M, Ethier CR, Johnston KW, Cobbold RS. 1990. Steady and pulsatile flow fields in an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model. J. Vasc. Surg. 12:747-53
54. Papaharilaou Y, Doorly DJ, Sherwin SJ. 2002. The influence of out-of-plane geometry on pulsatile flow within a distal end-to-side anastomosis. J. Biomech. 35:1225-39
55. Perktold & Peter RO, Resch M, Langs G. 1991. Pulsatile non-Newtonian blood flow in three-dimensional carotid bifurcation models: a numerical study of flow phenomena under different bifurcation angles. J. Biomed. Eng. 13:507-15
56. Rittgers SE, Karayannacos PE, Guy JF, Nerern RM, Shaw GM, et al. 1978. Velocity distribution and intimal proliferation in autologous vein graft in dogs. Circulation 42:792-801
57. Rosenson RS, McCormick A, Uretz EF. 1996. Distribution of blood viscosity values and biochemical correlates in healthy adults. Clin. Chem. 42:1189-95
58. Sherwin SJ, Shah O, Doorly DJ, Peiro J, Papaharilaou Y, et al. 2000. The influence of out of plane geometry on the flow within a distal-to-end anastomosis. J. Biomech. Eng. 122:86-95
59. Shu. MC, Hwang NH. 1988. Flow phenomena in compliant and noncompliant arteriovenous grafts. ASAIO Trans. 34:519-23
60. Shu MC, Noon GP, Hwang NH. 1987. Phasic flow patterns at a hemodialysis venous anastornosis. Biorheology 4:711-22
61. Skalak R, Ozkaya N, Skalak C. 1989. Biofluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21:167-204
62. Skelly CL, Meyerson SL, Curi MA, Loth F, Schwartz LB. 2001. The hemodynamics of vein grafts: measurement and meaning. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 15:110-22
63. Sottiurai VS, Yao JS, Batson RC, Sue SL, Jones R, Nakamura YA. 1989. Distal anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: histopathologic character and biogenesis. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 3:26-33
64. Steinman DA. 2004. Image-based computational fluid dynamics: a new paradigm for monitoring hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc. Haematol. Disord. 24:183-97
65. Steinman DA, Frayne R, Zhang X, Rutt BK, Ethier CR. 1996. MR measurement and numerical simulation of steady flow in an end-to-side anastomosis model. Biomech. 29:537-42
66. Taylor CA, Draney MT. Experimental and computational methods in cardiovascular fluid mechanics. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36:197-231
67. Taylor CA, Hughes TJR, Zarins CK. 1998. Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries. Comp Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 158:155-96
68. Tseng H, Peterson TE, Berk BC. 1995. Fluid shear stress stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase in endothelial cells. Circ. Res. 77:869-78
69. Tzima E, Irani-Tehrani M, Mosses WB, Dejana E, Schultz DA, et al. 2005. A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature 7057:426-31
70. Unnikrishnan S, Huynh TN, Brott BC, Ito Y, Cheng CH, et al. 2005. Turbulent flow evaluation of the venous needle during hemodialysis. J. Biomech. Eng. 127:1141-46
71. Van Tricht I, De Wachter D, Torodoir J, Vanhercke D, Verdonck P. 2005. Experimental analysis of the hemin punctured vascular access grafts. ASAIO J. 51:352-59
72. White SS, Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Bassiouny H, Loth F, et al. 1993. Hemodynamic patterns in two models of end-to-side vascular graft anastomoses: effects of pulsatility, flow division, Reynolds number, and hood length. J. Biomech. Eng. 115:104-11
73. Zarins CY, Zatina MA, Giddens DP, Ku DN, Glagov S. 1987. Shear stress regulation of artery lumen diamete, in experimental atherogenesis. J. Vasc. Surg. 5:413-20