Tendon adhesion measured by a video-assisted gliding test in a chicken model

Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 40-47

  Fu, S C ^a   Hung, L K ^a,b   Lee, Y W ^a   Mok, T Y ^a   Chan, K M ^a  

^a and Hong Kong Branch of CAS Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics   (Hong Kong)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Flexor digitorum profundus; Gliding resistance; Tendon adhesion; Ultrasound imaging

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CHICKEN; DISEASE MODEL; FIBROSIS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TENDON; TENDON INJURY; VIDEORECORDING; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CHICKENS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FIBROSIS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TENDON INJURIES; TENDONS; VIDEO RECORDING; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 79952837886     PISSN: 17531934     EISSN: 20436289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1753193410381674     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Amadio PC. Friction of the gliding surface - implications for tendon surgery rehabilitation. J Hand Ther. 2005, 18: 112-19. (Pubitemid 40569566)
2. Beredjiklian P. Biologic aspects of flexor tendon laceration and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85: 539-50. (Pubitemid 36538767)
3. Branford OA, Mudera V, Brown RA et al. A novel biomimetic material for engineering postsurgical adhesion using the injured digital flexor tendon-synovial complex as an in vivo model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008, 121: 781-93. (Pubitemid 351642811)
4. Cao Y, Chen CH, Wu YF et al. Digital oedema, adhesion formation and resistance to digital motion after primary flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 745-52.
5. Cao Y, Tang JB. Investigation of resistance of digital subcutaneous edema to gliding of the flexor tendon: an in vitro study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 1248-54. (Pubitemid 41774385)
6. Cao Y, Tang JB. Resistance to motion of flexor tendons and digital edema: an in vivo study in a chicken model. J Hand Surg Am. 2006, 31: 1645-51. (Pubitemid 44828298)
7. Cao Y, Tang JB. Strength of tendon repair decreases in the presence of an intact A2 pulley: biomechanical study in a chicken model. J Hand Surg Am. 2009, 34: 1763-70.
8. Chang J, Thunder R, Most D et al. Studies in flexor tendon wound healing: neutralizing antibody to TGF-beta1 increases postoperative range of motion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000, 105: 148-55. (Pubitemid 30027042)
9. Gudemez E, Eksioglu F, Korkusuz P et al. Chondroitin sulfate-coated polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate membrane prevents adhesion in full-thickness tendon tears of rabbits. J Hand Surg Am. 2002, 27: 293-306. (Pubitemid 34241194)
10. Jaibaji M, Brody GS, Rodgers K et al. A new model for experimental tendon adhesions in the chicken. Ann Plast Surg. 2000, 44: 205-10. (Pubitemid 30091568)
11. Karakurum G, Buyukbebeci O, Kalender M et al. Seprafilm interposition for preventing adhesion formation after tenolysis. An experimental study on the chicken flexor tendons. J Surg Res. 2003, 113: 195-200. (Pubitemid 37040889)
12. Khan U, Kakar S, Akali A et al. Modulation of the formation of adhesions during the healing of injured tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000, 82: 1054-8.
13. Lane JM, Black J, Bora Jr FW. Gliding function following flexortendon injury. A biomechanical study of rat tendon function. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976, 58: 985-90.
14. Lindsay WK, Walker FG. The effect of an anthistamine (promethazine) on digital flexor tendon healing in the chicken. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1961, 28: 634-48.
15. Moran SL, Ryan CK, Orlando GS et al. Effects of 5-fluorouracil on flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2000, 25: 242-51. (Pubitemid 30165587)
16. Peterson WW,Manske PR, Bollinger BA et al. Effect of pulley excision on flexor tendon biomechanics. J Orthop Res. 1986, 4: 96-101. (Pubitemid 16103558)
17. Strick MJ, Filan SL, Hile M et al. Adhesion formation after flexor tendon repair: a histologic and biomechanical comparison of 2- and 4-strand repairs in a chicken model. J Hand Surg Am. 2004, 29: 15-21. (Pubitemid 38146396)
18. Szabo RM, Younger E. Effects of indomethacin on adhesion formation after repair of zone II tendon lacerations in the rabbit. J Hand Surg Am. 1990, 15: 480-3. (Pubitemid 20231140)
19. Tang JB, Ishii S, Usui M et al. Flexor sheath closure during delayed primary tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1994, 19: 636-40. (Pubitemid 24233588)
20. Uchiyama S, Coert JH, Berglund L et al. Method for the measurement of friction between tendon and pulley. J Orthop Res. 1995, 13: 83-9.
21. Xie RG, Cao Y, Xu XF et al. The gliding force and work of flexion in the early days after primary repair of lacerated flexor tendons: an experimental study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 192-6. (Pubitemid 351638617)
22. Zhao C, Sun YL, Amadio PC et al. Surface treatment of flexor tendon autografts with carbodiimide-derivatized hyaluronic acid. An in vivo canine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006, 88: 2181-91. (Pubitemid 44536780)