Greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions reduction in a power system predominantly based on lignite

Energy

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 2266-2270

  Taseska, V ^a   Markovska, N ^a   Causevski, A ^b   Bosevski, T ^a   Pop Jordanov, J ^a  

^a MACEDONIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS   (Macedonia)

^b SS CYRIL AND METHODIUS UNIVERSITY   (Macedonia)

Author keywords

Emission reduction; Greenhouse gases (GHG); Mitigation scenarios

Indexed keywords

EMISSION CONTROL; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GAS EMISSIONS; GAS PLANTS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

BUSINESS-AS-USUAL; COMBINED CYCLE; ELECTRICITY-CONSUMPTION; EMISSION REDUCTION; EMISSIONS REDUCTION; GHG EMISSION; GHG MITIGATION; INDUSTRIAL CONSUMERS; MITIGATION COSTS; MITIGATION SCENARIOS; POWER SYSTEM EXPANSION; POWER SYSTEMS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE;

LIGNITE;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; LIGNITE; NUMERICAL MODEL; POWER PLANT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

EID: 79952813998     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. World Energy Council. Energy and Climate Change Study, June 2007.
2. Christov C., Simeonova K., Todorova S., Krastev V. Assessment of Mitigation Options for the Energy System in Bulgaria. Applied Energy 1997, 56(3/4):299-308.
3. Chen W., Wu Z., He J., Gao P., Xu S. Carbon emission control strategies for China: A comparative study with partial and general equilibrium versions of the China MARKAL model. Energy 2007, 32(1):59-72.
4. Duic N., Juretic F., Zeljko M., Bogdan Z. Croatia energy planning and Kyoto Protocol. Energy Policy 2005, 33(8):1003-1010.
5. 2 emissions and deregulating the electricity sector in Europe: a contradictory development?. Global Nest: The International Journal 2001, 3(1):59-70.
6. Agoris D., Tigas K., Giannakidis G., Siakkis F., Vassos S., Vassilakos N., et al. An analysis of the Greek energy system in view of the Kyoto commitments. Energy Policy 2004, 32(18):2019-2033.
7. Diakoulaki D., Mavrotas G., Orkopoulos D., Papayannakis L. A bottom-up decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in Greece. Energy 2006, 31(14):2638-2651.
8. Tsoutsos T., Papadopoulou E., Katsiri A., Papadopoulos A.M. Supporting schemes for renewable energy sources and their impact on reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases in Greece. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2008, 12(7):1767-1788.
9. Hristu-Varsakelis D., Karagianni S., Pempetzoglou M., Sfetsos A. Optimizing production with energy and GHG emission constraints in Greece: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 2010, 38(3):1566-1577.
10. 2 mitigation constraints in a developing country. Energy 2002, 27(3):271-286.
11. Jaber J.O. Greenhouse gas emissions and barriers to implementation in the Jordanian energy sector. Energy Policy 2002, 30(5):385-395.
12. Chung W.S., Tohno S., Shim S.Y. An estimation of energy and GHG emission intensity caused by energy consumption in Korea: an energy IO approach. Applied Energy 2009, 86(10):1902-1914.
13. Chedid R., Chaaban F., Salameh S. Policy analysis of greenhouse gas emissions: the case of the Lebanese electricity sector. Energy Conversion & Management 2001, 42(3):373-392.
14. El-Fadel M., Chedid R., Zeinati M., Hmaidan W. Mitigating energy-related GHG emissions through renewable energy. Renewable Energy 2003, 28(8):1257-1276.
15. 2 emissions in Turkey: Empirical analysis and future projection based on an economic growth. Energy Policy 2006, 34(18):3870-3876.
16. Sözen A., Gülseven Z., Arcaklioǧlu E. Forecasting based on sectoral energy consumption of GHGs in Turkey and mitigation policies. Energy Policy 2007, 35(12):6491-6505.
17. Sözen A., Alp I. Comparison of Turkey's performance of greenhouse gas emissions and local/regional pollutants with EU countries. Energy Policy 2009, 37(12):5007-5018.
18. Mojik I. Assessment of mitigation options for Slovakia's energy sector. Applied Energy 1997, 56(3/4):351-366.
19. Kumar A., Bhattacharya S., Pham H. Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biomass energy technologies in Vietnam using the long range energy alternative planning system model. Energy 2003, 28(7):627-654.
20. Iceim-Manu Inventory of Greenhouse Gases Emissions for the Second National Communication under the UNFCCC, Final report, Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning/UNDP See also:. http://www.unfccc.org.mk/documents/SNC%2520Inventory%2520Summary.pdf.
21. Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning of R.Macedonia Second National Communication on Climate Change of Macedonia, Skopje See also:. http://unfccc.int/essential_background/library/items/3599.php%3Frec%3Dj&priref%3D6570%23beg.
22. Energy Regulatory Commission of the Republic of Macedonia. Annual report for 2007 (G{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}d{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}sh{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}n{cyrillic} i{cyrillic}z{cyrillic}v{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}sh{cyrillic}t{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}j{cyrillic} z{cyrillic}a{cyrillic} r{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}b{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}t{cyrillic}a{cyrillic} n{cyrillic}a{cyrillic} R{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}g{cyrillic}u{cyrillic}l{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}t{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}r{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}t{cyrillic}a{cyrillic} k{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}m{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}s{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}j{cyrillic}a z{cyrillic}a{cyrillic} ye{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}r{cyrillic}g{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}t{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}k{cyrillic}a{cyrillic} n{cyrillic}a{cyrillic} R{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}p{cyrillic}u{cyrillic}b{cyrillic}l{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}k{cyrillic}a{cyrillic} M{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}k{cyrillic}ye{cyrillic}d{cyrillic}o{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}j{cyrillic}a{cyrillic} bo{cyrillic} 2007 g{cyrillic}od{cyrillic}i{cyrillic}n{cyrillic}a{cyrillic}). See also: http://www.erc.org.mk/Uploads/31.03.2008%2520Izvestaj%2520za%2520rabotata%2520na%2520RKE%2520vo%25202007%2520g%2520-%2520final.pdf.
23. International Atomic Energy Agency Wien Automatic System Planning (WASP) Package; a computer code for power generating system expansion planning, User's manual 2001, IAEA, Vienna.
24. Stockholm Environment Institute - Boston LEAP User Guide., SEI, Boston, USA See also:. http://www.energycommunity.org/default.asp%3Faction%3D47.
25. Lee Y.E., Jung Y.B. Challenges of nuclear power for sustainable role in Korean energy policy. Energy Conversion and Management 2008, 49(7):1951-1959.
26. Papagiannis G., Dagoumas A., Lettas N., Dokopoulos P. Economic and environmental impacts from the implementation of an intelligent demand side management system at the European level. Energy Policy 2008, 36(1):163-180.
27. Markovska N., Todorovski M., Bosevski T., Pop-Jordanov J. Cost and environmental effectiveness of climate change mitigation measures. Sustainable energy production and consumption 2008, 67-73. Springer Science. F. Barbir, S. Ulgiati (Eds.).
28. Markovska N., Taseska V., Pop-Jordanov J. SWOT analyses of the national energy sector for sustainable energy development. Energy 2009, 34(6):752-756.