An estimation of energy and GHG emission intensity caused by energy consumption in Korea: An energy IO approach

Applied Energy

Volumn 86, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1902-1914

  Chung, Whan Sam ^a   Tohno, Susumu ^b   Shim, Sang Yul ^c  

^a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute   (South Korea)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Korea Energy Economics Institute (KEEI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Energy input output analysis; Energy intensity; Greenhouse gas emission intensity; Hybrid input output table; Korea

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ENERGY RESOURCES; ENERGY UTILIZATION;

ECONOMETRIC MODEL; ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES; ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT; ENERGY INPUTS; ENERGY INTENSITY; INPUT-OUTPUT TABLE; INTEGRATED MODELING; KOREA;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY PLANNING; ENERGY USE; GREENHOUSE GAS;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KOREA;

EID: 64649096459     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. 2 emissions from fuel combustion 1971-2005; 2007. ISBN: 978-92-64-02771-8.
2. 2 emissions reduction by a MARKAL model. Appl Energy 83 (2006) 1047-1061
3. Schrattenholzer L. The energy supply model MESSAGE (1981), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) [RR-81-31]
4. Italianer A. The HERMES model: complete specification and first estimation results (1986), Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
5. Nakata T. Energy-economic models and the environment. Prog Energy Combus Sci 30 (2004) 417-475
6. Borges A.M. Applied general equilibrium models: an assessment of their usefulness for policy analysis. OECD Econ Stud 7 (1986) 7-43
7. 2 emissions. OECD Econ Stud 19 (1992)
8. Jorgensen D.W., and Wilcoxen P.J. Intertemporal general equilibrium modeling of US environmental regulation. J Policy Model 12 (1990) 715-744
9. Loulou R., Waaub J.P., and Zaccour G. A Coupled Bottom-Up/Top-Down Model for GHG Abatement Scenarios in the Swiss Housing Sector. Energy Environ (2005) 27-61 10.1007/0-387-25352-1_2
10. Gritsevskyi A., and Schrattenholzer L. Costs of reducing carbon emissions: an integrated modeling framework approach. Climatic Change 56 (2003) 167-184
11. Kannan R., and Strachan N. Modelling the UK residential energy sector under long-term decarbonisation scenarios: comparison between energy systems and sectoral modelling approaches. Appl Energy 86 (2009) 416-428
12. Capros P, Karadeloglou P. Energy and carbon tax: a quantitative analysis using the HERMES-MIDAS model. In: SEO conference, Amsterdam, December 13, 1992.
13. Wright D.J. Goods and services: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 2 4 (1974) 307-315
14. Bullard C.W., and Herendeen R.A. The energy cost of goods and services. Energy Policy 3 4 (1975) 268-278
15. Peet N.J., Carter A.J., and Baines J.T. Energy in the New Zealand household 1974-1980. Energy 10 11 (1985) 1197-1208
16. Pachauri S., and Spreng D. Direct and indirect energy requirements of households in India. Energy Policy 30 6 (2002) 511-523
17. Gay P.W., and Proops J.L.R. Carbon-dioxide production by the UK economy: an IO assessment. Appl Energy 44 2 (1993) 113-130
18. Lenzen M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an IO analysis. Energy Policy 26 6 (1998) 495-506
19. 2 emission using structural decomposition analysis. Seoul National University, Master's thesis; 1999.
20. 2 emissions in Korea. Seoul National University, Master's thesis; 2004.
21. Syrquin M. Patterns of structural change. Handbook of development economics, vol. 1; 1988 [chapter 7].
22. Cruz LG. Energy-environment-economy Interactions: an IO approach applied to the Portuguese case paper. In: 7th Biennial conference of the international society for ecological economics, environment and development: globalization & the challenges for local & international governance, March 6-9 2002, Sousse; 2002 (Tunisia).
23. 2 emissions (2002), Socio-economic Research Center, CRIEPI [No. Y99009, in Japanese]
24. Nansai K., Moriguchi Y., and Tohno S. Embodied energy and emission intensity data for Japan using IO tables (3EID) (2002), Center for Global Environmental Research (CGER) [CGER-D031-2002]
25. Miller R.E., and Blair P.D. IO analysis: foundations and extensions (1985), Prentice-Hall, Inc.
26. Kim S.W. A study on the industry restructuring to cope with the Kyoto protocol (1998), Korea Environment Institute (KEI) p. 64-73 [in Korean]
27. Choi H., and Lee K. An estimation of carbon embodied in the export goods of Korea using a hybrid IO approach. Environ Resour Econ Rev 13 3 (2004) 441-468 [in Korean]
28. BOK (The Bank of Korea). 2000 IO tables; 2003. 12.
29. KEEI (Korea Energy Economics Institute). 2006 Yearbook of energy statistics; 2007.
30. Hawkins D., and Simon H.A. Note: some conditions of macro-economic stability. Econometrica 17 (1949) 245-248
31. Shim SY. Composition of Korean energy IO table. Korea Energy Economics Institute, report no. 05-01; 2005 (in Korean).
32. IPCC. The revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (Revised Guidelines); 1996.
33. IPCC. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories; 2007.
34. OECD/IEA. Key world energy statistics; 2007.
35. KEEI (Korea Energy Economics Institute). Second national communication of the Republic of Korea under the United Nations framework convention on climate change (2003), The Government of the Republic of Korea
36. Chung W.S., and Tohno S. Convertibility of monetary and physical input-output analysis; an application to energy sources. Korean J LCA 9 1 (2008) 47-55
37. Chung WS, Yun SW, Lee DS, Jeong JW. New power expansion strategy and a low GHG emitting economy in Korea. In: Proceedings of ICAPP '08, Anaheim, CA, USA, June 8-12, 2008.