Comparison of Turkey's performance of greenhouse gas emissions and local/regional pollutants with EU countries

Energy Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 5007-5018

  Sözen, Adnan ^a   Alp, Ihsan ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Gas emission efficiency; GHG emissions

Indexed keywords

EMISSION REDUCTION; EU COUNTRIES; EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES; GHG EMISSION; INPUT ENERGY; INPUT VALUES; KYOTO PROTOCOL; NON-METHANE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OUTPUT VALUES; SECTORAL ENERGY; STRATEGIC PLAN; TOTAL EMISSIONS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DATA HANDLING; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY RESOURCES; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GAS EMISSIONS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; GREENHOUSES; LEAKAGE (FLUID); LINEAR PROGRAMMING; METHANE; POLLUTION; STRATEGIC PLANNING; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

CARBON MONOXIDE;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EUROPEAN UNION; GREENHOUSE GAS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLICY STRATEGY; POLLUTION POLICY; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 71549156529     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.069     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Akcasoy K., Onder F., and Güven S. Statistical Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Turkey between the Years of 1970 and 2010 (2000), DIE, Turkey, Ankara
2. Andersen P., and Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39 (1993) 1261-1264
3. Balat M. Energy consumption and economic growth in turkey during the past decades. Energy Policy 36 1 (2008) 118-127
4. Banker R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (1984) 1078-1092
5. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
6. Conzelmann, G., 2004. Analysis of GHG Mitigation Issues in Turkey, Ankara Climate Change Conference, 1.
7. Demirbaş A. Energy and environmental issues relating to greenhouse gas emissions in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 44 (2003) 203-213
8. Honma, S., Hu, J., Total-factor energy productivity growth of regions in Japan. Energy Policy, in press, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.034.
9. Honma S., and Hu J. Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Japan. Energy Policy 36 (2008) 821-833
10. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
11. 2 emissions. Ecological Economics 66 (2008) 687-699
12. Ramakrishnan R. A multi-factor efficiency perspective to the relationships among world GDP, energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 73 (2006) 483-494
13. Salay, J., 2004. Climate Policy in the EU: The European Climate Change Programme. Ankara Climate Change Conference, 1, pp. 46-78.
14. Sözen A., Gülseven Z., and Arcakli{dotless}oǧlu E. Forecasting based on sectoral energy consumption of GHGs in turkey and mitigation policies. Energy Policy 35 12 (2007) 6491-6505
15. 2 emissions vs. CO2 responsibility: an input-output approach for the Turkish economy. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 855-868
16. Türkeş, M., 2002. İklim deǧişikliǧi ve sürdürülebilir kalki{dotless}nma ulusal deǧerlendirme raporu,Türkiye Teknoloji Geliştirme Vakfi{dotless}, Ankara, (in Turkish).
17. Zhou P., Ang B.W., and Poh K.L. A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research 189 (2008) 1-18