Temporal change in inbreeding depression in life-history traits in captive populations of guppy (Poecilia reticulata): Evidence for purging?

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 823-834

  Larsen, L K ^a   Pelabon C ^a   Bolstad, G H ^a   Viken, A ^b   Fleming, I A ^c   Rosenqvist, G ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre   (Norway)

^c MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Captive breeding; Deleterious alleles; Fish; Genetic load; Inbreeding coefficient; Life history traits; Purging; Selection

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; CAPTIVITY; CLUTCH SIZE; FITNESS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NATURAL SELECTION; TELEOST; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLUTCH SIZE; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; GENETICS; INBREEDING; SURVIVAL; TIME;

ANIMALS; CLUTCH SIZE; INBREEDING; POECILIA; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

POECILIA RETICULATA;

EID: 79952720385     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02224.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Allendorf, F.W. & Luikart, G. 2007. Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
2. Araki, H., Berejikian, B.A., Ford, M.J. & Blouin, M.S. 2008. Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild. Evol. Appl. 1: 342-355.
3. Ballou, J.D. 1997. Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. J. Hered. 88: 169-178.
4. Bijlsma, R., Bundgaard, J. & Van Putten, W.F. 1999. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 1125-1137.
5. Boakes, E.H., Wang, J. & Amos, W. 2007. An investigation of inbreeding depression and purging in captive pedigreed populations. Heredity 98: 172-182.
6. Bryant, E.H., Meffert, L.M. & McCommas, S.A. 1990. Fitness rebound in serially bottlenecked populations of the house-fly. Am. Nat. 136: 542-549.
7. Byers, D.L. & Waller, D.M. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 479-513.
8. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
9. Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. 74: 329-340.
10. Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J.H. 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 783-796.
11. Crawley, M.J. 2007. The R Book. Jon Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
12. Crnokrak, P. & Barrett, S.C.H. 2002. Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56: 2347-2358.
13. Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D.A. 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260-270.
14. Darwin, C. 1876. The Effects of Cross and Self-Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom. John Murray, London.
15. Day, S.B., Bryant, E.H. & Meffert, L.M. 2003. The influence of variable rates of inbreeding on fitness, environmental responsiveness, and evolutionary potential. Evolution 57: 1314-1324.
16. Derose, M.A. & Roff, D.A. 1999. A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution 53: 1288-1292.
17. Ehiobu, N.G., Goddard, M.E. & Taylor, J.F. 1989. Effect of rate of inbreeding on inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 123-127.
18. Ellstrand, N.C. & Elam, D.R. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 217-242.
19. Fox, C.W., Scheibly, K.L., Wallin, W.G., Hitchcock, L.J., Stillwell, R.C. & Smith, B.P. 2006. The genetic architecture of life span and mortality rates: gender and species differences in inbreeding load of two seed-feeding beetles. Genetics 174: 763-773.
20. Frankham, R., Gilligan, D.M., Morris, D. & Briscoe, S.A. 2001. Inbreeding and extinction: effects of purging. Conserv. Genet. 2: 279-285.
21. Frankham, R. 2008. Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mol. Ecol. 17: 325-333.
22. Fraser, D.J. 2008. How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids. Evol. Appl. 1: 535-586.
23. Fu, Y.B., Namkoong, G. & Carlson, J.E. 1998. Comparison of breeding strategies for purging inbreeding depression via simulation. Conserv. Biol. 12: 856-864.
24. Fujio, Y. & Nakajima, M. 1992. Estimation of genetic load in guppy population. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 58: 1603-1605.
25. Hedrick, P.W. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73: 363-372.
26. Hedrick, P.W. & Kalinowski, S.T. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 139-162.
27. Houde, A.E. 1997. Sex, Color, and Mate Choice in Guppies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
28. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
29. Houle, D. 1998. How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits? Genetica 102-3: 241-253.
30. Keller, L.F. 1998. Inbreeding and its fitness effects in an insular population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 52: 240-250.
31. Keller, L.F. & Waller, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 230-241.
32. Lacy, R.C. & Ballou, J.D. 1998. Effectiveness of selection in reducing the genetic load in populations of Peromyscus polionotus during generations of inbreeding. Evolution 52: 900-909.
33. Lande, R. & Schemske, D.W. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
34. Latter, B.D.H., Mulley, J.C., Reid, D. & Pascoe, L. 1995. Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139: 287-297.
35. Leberg, P.L. & Firmin, B.D. 2008. Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Mol. Ecol. 17: 334-343.
36. Lynch, C.B. 1977. Inbreeding effects upon animals derived from a wild population of Mus musculus. Evolution 31: 526-537.
37. Lynch, M. & Walsh, L. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland.
38. Marr, A.B., Arcese, P., Hochachka, W.M., Reid, J.M. & Keller, L.F. 2006. Interactive effects of environmental stress and inbreeding on reproductive traits in a wild bird population. J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 1406-1415.
39. Meagher, S., Penn, D.J. & Potts, W.K. 2000. Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 3324-3329.
40. Mills, L.S. & Smouse, P.E. 1994. Demographic consequences of inbreeding in remnant populations. Am. Nat. 144: 412-431.
41. Moran, M.D. 2003. Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100: 403-405.
42. Nakadate, M., Shikano, T. & Taniguchi, N. 2003. Inbreeding depression and heterosis in various quantitative traits of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Aquaculture 220: 219-226.
43. Pitcher, T.E., Rodd, F.H. & Rowe, L. 2008. Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Genetica 134: 137-146.
44. Reed, D.H. & Bryant, E.H. 2000. Experimental tests of minimum viable population size. Anim. Conserv. 3: 7-14.
45. Reed, D.H., Lowe, E.H., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2003. Inbreeding and extinction: effects of rate of inbreeding. Conserv. Genet. 4: 405-410.
46. Reznick, D. & Endler, J.A. 1982. The impact of predation on life-history evolution in trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36: 160-177.
47. Ridley, M. 2004. Evolution, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
48. Roff, D.A. 2002. Inbreeding depression: tests of the overdominance and partial dominance hypotheses. Evolution 56: 768-775.
49. Saccheri, I., Kuussaari, M., Kankare, M., Vikman, P., Fortelius, W. & Hanski, I. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491-494.
50. Sheridan, L. & Pomiankowski, A. 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry, spot asymmetry and inbreeding depression in the sexual coloration of male guppy fish. Heredity 79: 515-523.
51. Shikano, T., Chiyokubo, T., Nakadate, M. & Fujio, Y. 2000. The relationship between allozyme heterozygosity and salinity tolerance in wild and domestic populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Aquaculture 184: 233-245.
52. Shikano, T., Chiyokubo, T. & Taniguchi, N. 2001a. Effect of inbreeding on salinity tolerance in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Aquaculture 202: 45-55.
53. Shikano, T., Chiyokubo, T. & Taniguchi, N. 2001b. Temporal changes in allele frequency, genetic variation and inbreeding depression in small populations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Heredity 86: 153-160.
54. Snyder, N.F.R., Derrickson, S.R., Beissinger, S.R., Wiley, J.W., Smith, T.B., Toone, W.D. et al. 1996. Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conserv. Biol. 10: 338-348.
55. Swindell, W.R. & Bouzat, J.L. 2006. Reduced inbreeding depression due to historical inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for purging. J. Evolution. Biol. 19: 1257-1264.
56. Van Oosterhout, C., Trigg, R.E., Carvalho, G.R., Magurran, A.E., Hauser, L. & Shaw, P.W. 2003. Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots. J. Evolution. Biol. 16: 273-281.
57. Van Oosterhout, C., Smith, A.M., Hanfling, B., Ramnarine, I.W., Mohammed, R.S. & Cable, J. 2007. The guppy as a conservation model: implications of parasitism and inbreeding for reintroduction success. Conserv. Biol. 21: 1573-1583.
58. Wang, J.L. & Hill, W.G. 1999. Effect of selection against deleterious mutations on the decline in heterozygosity at neutral loci in closely inbreeding populations. Genetics 153: 1475-1489.
59. Wang, J.L., Hill, W.G., Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1999. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet. Res. 74: 165-178.
60. Willis, J.H. 1999. The role of genes of large effect on inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 53: 1678-1691.
61. Yoccoz, N.G. 1991. Use, overuse, and misuse of significance tests in evolutionary biology and ecology. ESA Bulletin 72: 106-111.