The effect of decision aids on the agreement between women's and physicians' decisional conflict about hormone replacement therapy

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 211-221

  Légaré, France ^a,c   O'Connor, Annette M ^a,c   Graham, Ian D ^a,c   Wells, Georges A ^a,c   Jacobsen, Mary Jane ^a   Elmslie, Tom ^b,c   Drake, Elizabeth R ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b Sisters of Charity of Ottawa Health Service   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agreement; Decision aids; Patient physician interaction; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HORMONE SUBSTITUTION; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; PAMPHLETS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; TEACHING MATERIALS; WOMEN;

EID: 0038777221     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00129-5     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Towle A., Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. Br. Med. J. 319:1999;766-771. [see comments].
2. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Kinnersley P. Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 49:1999;477-482.
3. O'Connor A., Tugwell P., Wells G.A., Elmslie T., Jolly E., Hollingworth G.et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ. Couns. 33:1998;267-279.
4. Carpenito LJ. Decisional conflict. In: Lippincott WW, editor. Nursing diagnosis: application to clinical practice. Philadelphia, PA, 2000.
5. Ottawa Health Decision Center. Patients decision aids. Available at http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/OHDEC/decision_aids.asp, June 2002.
6. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M, Tetroe J, Llewellyn-Thomas H, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. In: Update software ed. Oxford: The Cochrane Library, 2002.
7. O'Connor A.M., Rostom A., Fiset V., Tetroe J., Entwistle V., Llewellyn-Thomas H.et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: a Cochrane systematic review. Br. Med. 319:1999;731-734. [see comments].
8. Entwistle V.A., Sowden A.J., Watt I.S. Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision-making: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged? J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 3:1998;100-107.
9. Edwards A., Elwyn G. How should effectiveness of risk communication to aid patients' decisions be judged? A review of the literature. Med. Decis. Making. 19:1999;428-434. [see comments].
10. Mead N., Bower P. Patient-centeredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 51:2000;1087-1110.
11. DeLorey C. Women at midlife: women's perceptions, physicians' perceptions. J. Women Aging. 1:1989;57-69.
12. Ghali W.A., Freund K.M., Boss R.D., Ryan C.A., Moskowitz M.A. Menopausal hormone therapy: physician awareness of patient attitudes. Am. J. Med. 103:1997;3-10.
13. Hemminki E., Topo P., Malin M., Kangas I. Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause. Maturitas. 16:1993;163-173.
14. Griffiths F. Women's control and choice regarding HRT. Soc. Sci. Med. 49:1999;469-481.
15. Massé R., Légaré F., Côté L., Dodin S. The limitations of a negotiation model for perimenopausal women. Soc. Health Illness. 23:2001;44-64.
16. Rabin D.S., Cipparrone N., Linn E.S., Moen M. Why menopausal women do not want to take hormone replacement therapy. Menopause. 6:1999;61-67.
17. Griffiths F. Women's health concern, is the promotion of hormone replacement therapy for prevention important to women? Fam. Pract. 12:1995;54-59.
18. Rothert M., Padonu G., Holmes-Rovner M., Kroll J., Talarczyk G., Rovner D.et al. Menopausal women as decision makers in health care. Exp. Gerontol. 29:1994;463-468.
19. Kaplan S.H., Greenfield S., Gandek B., Rogers W.H., Ware J.E. Jr. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann. Int. Med. 124:1996;497-504.
20. Hilditch J.R., Lewis J., Peter A., van Maris B., Ross A., Franssen E.et al. A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Maturitas. 24:1996;161-175.
21. O'Connor A.M. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med. Decis. Making. 15:1995;25-30.
22. Rother M.L., O'Connor A.M. Health decisions and decision support for women. Annu. Rev. Nurs. Res. 19:2001;307-324.
23. O'Connor A. Decisional conflict scale, 1999 (psychometric properties) available at http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/OHDEC/dcsdoc.pdf, 2001.
24. Dolan J.G. A method for evaluating health care providers' decision making: the provider decision process assessment instrument. Med. Decis. Making. 19:1999;38-41.
25. Bartko J.J., Carpenter W.T. Jr. On the methods and theory of reliability. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 163:1976;307-317.
26. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994.
27. Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. Hamilton (Ont.): BCD Inc., 1998.
28. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley, 1981.
29. Kramer M.S., Feinstein A.R. Clinical biostatistics, LIV: the biostatistics of concordance. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 29:1981;111-123.
30. Armstrong GD. The intraclass correlation as a measure of interrater reliability of subjective judgments. Nurs Res 1981;30:314-15 and 320A.
31. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33:1977;671-679.
32. Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
33. Starfield B., Wray C., Hess K., Gross R., Birk P.S., D'Lugoff B.C. The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care. Am. J. Public Health. 71:1981;127-131.
34. Bass M.J., Buck C., Turner L., Dickie G., Pratt G., Robinson H.C. The physician's actions and the outcome of illness in family practice. J. Fam. Pract. 23:1986;43-47.
35. Goldberg R., Guadagnoli E., Silliman R.A., Glicksman A. Cancer patients' concerns: congruence between patients and primary care physicians. J. Cancer Educ. 5:1990;193-199.
36. Elwyn G, Edwards A. Measuring the extent to which clinicians involve patients in decision making: the option (observing patient involvement) scale. In: Shared decision making summer school. Oxford: Ste-Catherine's College, 2001.
37. Brown J.B., Weston W.W., Stewart M.A. Patient-centered interviewing. Part II. Finding common ground. Can. Fam. Physician. 35:1989;153-157.
38. Stewart M., Belle Brown J., Donner A., McWhinney I.R., Oates J., Weston W.W.et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J. Fam. Pract. 49:2000;796-804.
39. Weston W.W. Informed and shared decision-making: the crux of patient-centered care. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 165:2001;438-439.
40. Suarez-Almazor M.E., Conner-Spady B., Kendall C.J., Russell A.S., Skeith K. Lack of congruence in the ratings of patients' health status by patients and their physicians. Med. Decis. Making. 21:2001;113-121.
41. Morgan M.W., Deber R.B., Llewellyn-Thomas H.A., Gladstone P., Cusimano R.J., O'Rourke K.et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease. J. Gen. Int. Med. 15:2000;685-693.
42. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
43. O'Connor A., Llewellyn-Thomas H., Sawka C., Pinfold S.P., To T., Harrison D.E. Physician's opinions about decision aids for patients considering systemic adjuvant therapy for axillary-node negative breast cancer. Patient Educ. Couns. 30:1997;143-153.
44. Allison J.J., Kiefe C.I., Cook E.F., Gerrity M.S., Orav E.J., Centor R. The association of physician attitudes about uncertainty and risk taking with resource use in a medicare HMO. Med. Decis. Making. 18:1998;320-329.
45. Howie J.G., Heaney D.J., Maxwell M., Walker J.J., Freeman G.K., Rai H. Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey. Br. Med. J. 319:1999;738-743. [see comments].
46. Haddad S., Potvin L., Roberge D., Pineault R., Remondin M. Patient perception of quality following a visit to a doctor in a primary care unit. Fam. Pract. 17:2000;21-29.
47. Prochaska JO. An eclectic and integrative approach: transtheoretical therapy. In: Gurman AS, Messer SB, editors. Essential psychotherapies: theory and practice. New York: The Guilford Press, 1995.
48. Haas J., Cook E., Puopolo A., Burstin H., Cleary P., Brennan T. Is the professional satisfaction of general internist associated with patient satisfaction? J. Gen. Int. Med. 15:2000;140-141.
49. Donner A. Sample size requirements for the comparison of two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement. Stat. Med. 16:1998;1157-1168.
50. Giraudeau B. Negative values of the intraclass correlation coefficient are not theoretically possible. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 49:1996;1205-1206.
51. Judd CM, McClelland GH. Data analysis: a model-comparaison approach. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, 1989.
52. Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patient-centered care. Br. Med. J. 322:2001;444-445.
53. Belle Brown J, Stewart M, Tessier S. Assessing communication between patients and doctors: a manual for scoring patient-centered communication. London, Canada: The University of Western Ontario Working Paper Series, 1995. p. 95-2.