High-frequency filtering of strong-motion records

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 395-409

  Douglas, John ^a,b   Boore, David M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^b BRGM   (France)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

; Filtering; Ground motion models; Ground motion prediction equations; Response spectra; Stochastic method; Strong motion data

Indexed keywords

FILTERING; GROUND-MOTION MODELS; GROUND-MOTION PREDICTION EQUATIONS; RESPONSE SPECTRA; STOCHASTIC METHODS; STRONG-MOTION DATA;

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; HIGH PASS FILTERS; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; THERMAL NOISE;

EQUATIONS OF MOTION;

DATA SET; DISPLACEMENT; FILTER; GROUND MOVEMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY; STRONG MOTION;

EID: 79952699824     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9208-4     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 94-127.
2. Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2006) Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(9): 1145-1165.
3. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(4): 371-400.
4. Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Eng 3(1): 1-53. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-005-0183-0.
5. Anderson JG, Hough SE (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(5): 1969-1993.
6. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(6): 2181-2205. doi: 10. 1785/0120050245.
7. Bindi D, Luzi L, Massa M, Pacor F (2010) Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian Accelerometric Archive (ITACA). Bull Earthq Eng doi: 10. 1007/s10518-009-9130-9 (in press).
8. Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS (1999) Displacement spectra for seismic design. J Earthq Eng 3(1): 1-32.
9. Boore DM (2001) Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5): 1199-1211.
10. Boore DM (2003a) Analog-to-digital conversion as a source of drifts in displacements derived from digital recordings of ground acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(5): 2017-2024.
11. Boore DM (2003b) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160(3-4): 635-676. doi: 10. 1007/PL00012553.
12. Boore DM (2004) Long-period ground motions from digital acceleration recordings: A new era in engineering seismology. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on future directions in instrumentation for strong motion and engineering seismology. Kluwer, Kusadasi, Turkey.
13. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0. 01 s and 10. 0 s. Earthq Spect 24(1): 99-138. doi: 10. 1193/1. 2830434.
14. Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(2): 93-115.
15. Boore DM, Campbell KW, Atkinson GM (2010) Determination of stress parameters for eight well-recorded earthquakes in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(4): 1632-1645. doi: 10. 1785/0120090328.
16. Bragato PL (2004) Regression analysis with truncated samples and its application to ground-motion attenuation studies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(4): 1369-1378.
17. Campbell KW (1997) Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 154-179.
18. Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N, Silva W (2008) NGA project strong-motion database. Earthq Spect 24(1): 23-44. doi: 10. 1193/1. 2894831.
19. Converse AM, Brady AG (1992) BAP basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software, version 1. 0. Open-File Report 92-296A, US Geological Survey.
20. Danciu L, Tselentis GA (2007) Engineering ground-motion parameters attenuation relationships for Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(1B): 162-183. doi: 10. 1785/0120040087.
21. Darragh B, Silva W, Gregor N (2004) Strong motion record processing procedures for the PEER center. In: Proceedings of COSMOS workshop on strong-motion record processing. Richmond, California, pp 1-12.
22. Douglas J (2003a) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth Sci Rev 61(1-2): 43-104.
23. Douglas J (2003b) What is a poor quality strong-motion record?. Bull Earthq Eng 1(1): 141-156.
24. Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(9): 979-993.
25. s30 = 450 to 900 m/s). Interim report issued for USGS review.
26. Johnson RA (1973) An earthquake spectrum prediction technique. Bull Seismol Soc Am 63(4): 1255-1274.
27. Jousset P, Douglas J (2007) Long-period earthquake ground displacements recorded on Guadeloupe (French Antilles). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(7): 949-963. doi: 10. 1002/eqe. 666.
28. Joyner WB, Boore DM (1982) Prediction of earthquake response spectra. Open-File Report 82-977, U. S. Geological Survey.
29. Joyner WB, Boore DM (1988) Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of earthquake engineering & soil dynamics II, geotechnical division, ASCE, pp 43-102.
30. Paolucci R, Rovelli A, Faccioli E, Cauzzi C, Finazzi D, Vanini M, Di Alessandro C, Calderoni G (2008) On the reliability of long period spectral ordinates from digital accelerograms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(5): 697-710.
31. Péquegnat C, Guéguen P, Hatzfeld D, Langlais M (2008) The French Accelerometric Network (RAP) and National Data Centre (RAP-NDC). Seismol Res Lett 79(1): 79-89.
32. Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthq Spect 24(1): 3-21. doi: 10. 1193/1. 2894833.
33. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia 721.
34. Rupakhety R, Halldorsson B, Sigbjörnsson R (2010) Estimating coseismic deformations from near source strong motion records: methods and case studies. Bull Earthq Eng 8(4): 787-811. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-009-9167-9.
35. Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2): 337-352.
36. Sadigh K, Chang CY, Egan JA, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68(1): 180-189.
37. L = 5. 0 earthquake near Lourdes (France): new evidence for NS extension across the Pyrenees. Geophys J Int 175(2): 649-664. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-246X. 2008. 03911. x.
38. Trifunac MD (1972) A note on correction of strong-motion accelerograms for instrument response. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62(1): 401-409.
39. Trifunac MD (1978) Response spectra of earthquake ground motions. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 104(EM5): 1081-1097.
40. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2007) A performance-based approach to define the site specific earthquake ground motion. Regulatory Guide 1. 208.
41. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2008) Interim staff guidance on seismic issues associated with high frequency ground motion in design certification and combined license applications. Interim Staff Guidance DC/COL-ISG1.
42. Zhao JX, Zhang J, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H, Irikura K, Thio HK, Somerville PG, Fukushima Y, Fukushima Y (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(3): 898-913. doi: 10. 1785/0120050122.