A multimethod approach to evaluating critical care information systems

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-37

  Lising, Maricel ^a,c   Kennedy, Curtis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b TEXAS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Bacterial Barcodes Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical care; Evaluation studies; Nursing documentation system; Review; Time and motion studies

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTENSIVE CARE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL; REVIEW;

ADULT; CRITICAL CARE; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MALE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING SERVICE, HOSPITAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 13644255994     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200501000-00007     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Dick RS, Steen EB. The computer based patient record: an essential technology for healthcare. Institute of Medicine US. Committee of Improving the patient record. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.
2. Ammenwerth E, Eichstadter R, Haux R, Pohl U, Rebel S, Ziegler S. A randomized evaluation of a computer-based nursing documentation system. Methods Inf Med. 2001;40(2):61-68.
3. Frank-Stromborg M, Christensen A, Elmhurst D. Nurse documentation: not done or worse, done the wrong way. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28(5):841-846.
4. Allan J, Englebright J. Patient-centered documentation - an effective and efficient use of clinical information systems. J Nurs Adm. 2000;30(2):90-95.
5. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):69-84.
6. Bond CA, Raehl CL, Franke T. Medication errors in United States hospitals. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21(9):1023-1036.
7. Tang PC, Fafchamps D, Shortliffe EH. Traditional medical records as a source of clinical data in the outpatient setting. Proc 18th Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994;575-579.
8. Menke JA, Broner CW, Campbell DY, McKissick MY, Edwards-Beckett JA. Computerized clinical documentation system in the pediatric intensive care unit. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001; 1(1):3.
9. Tang PC, LaRosa MP, Gorden SM. Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6:245-251.
10. Case study finds computerized ICU information system can significantly reduce time spent by nurses on documentation. Press Release, October 10, 2003. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/news/ press/pr2003/compicupr.htm. Accessed March 30, 2004.
11. Fraenkel DJ, Cowie M, Daley P. Quality benefits of an intensive care Clinical information system. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(1):120-125.
12. Nahm R, Poston I. Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Comput Nurs. 2000;18(5):220-229.
13. Pabst MK, Scherubel JC, Minnick AF. The impact of computerized documentation of nurses' use of time. Comput Nurs. 1996;14(1):25-30.
14. Baud R, Fieschi M, Le Beux P, Ruch P. The new navigators: from professionals to patients. In: Proceedings of Medical Informatics Europe; May 4-7, 2003; St. Malo, France.
15. van der Meijdan MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(3):235-243.
16. Anderson JG, Aydin CE, Jay SJ. Evaluating Healthcare Information Systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
17. Kaplan B. Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(2):94-101.
18. Heathfield HA, Pitty D, Hanka R. Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. BMJ. 1998; 316:1959-1961.
19. Dowling AF. Do hospital staff interfere with computer system implementation? Healthcare Manage Rev. 1980;5:23-32.
20. Lyytinen K. Expectation failure concept and systems analysts' views of information system failure: Results of an exploratory study. Inform Manage. 1988;14:45-46.
21. Lyytinen K, Hirschheim R. Information systems failure - a survey and classification of empirical literature. Oxford Surv Inform Technol. 1987;4:257-309.
22. Heathfield HA, Wyatt J. Philosophies for the design and development of clinical decision-support systems. Methods Inform Med. 1993;32(1):1-8.
23. Bradshaw KE, Sittig DF, Garner RM, Pryor TA, Budd M. Computer-based data entry for nurses in the ICU. MD Comput. 1989;6(5):274-280.
24. Pierpont GL, Thilgen D. Effect of computerized charting on nursing activity in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1067-1073.
25. Talmon J, Enning J, Castaneda G, et al. The VATAM guidelines. Int J Med Inform. 1999;56:107-115.
26. Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mansmann U. Acceptance of information technology in a clinical environment - results of quantitative and qualitative analysis. In: Brown A, Remenyi D, eds. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation (ECITE), Paris, France, 15-16 July 2002. 2002:39-44. ISBN 0-9540488-5-7.
27. Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative research: reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311:42-45.
28. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin B. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(5):423-429.