Can big 4 versus non-big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics?

Accounting Review

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 259-286

  Lawrence, Alastair ^a   Minutti Meza, Miguel ^a   Zhang, Ping ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Analyst forecast accuracy; Attribute based matching; Big 4 versus non Big 4 audit quality; Discretionary accruals; Ex ante cost of equity capital; Propensity score matching

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952665095     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr.00000009     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Armstrong, C., A. Jagolinzer, and D. Larcker. 2010. Chief executive officer equity incentives and accounting irregularities. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (2): 225-271.
2. Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 611-639. (Pubitemid 36989973)
3. Beatty, R. 1989. Auditor reputations and the pricing of initial public offerings. The Accounting Review 64 (4): 693-709.
4. Becker, C, M. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (1): 1-24. (Pubitemid 128541778)
5. Behn, B., J. H. Choi, and T. Kang. 2008. Audit quality and properties of analyst earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 83 (2): 327-359.
6. Beneish, M. 1999. Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP. The Accounting Review 74 (4): 425-457.
7. Butler, M., A. Leone, and M. Willenborg. 2004. An empirical analysis of auditor reporting and its association with abnormal accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (2): 139-165. (Pubitemid 38687189)
8. CFA Institute Center. 2008. June Survey Where Do You Stand? Results on Auditors. Charlottesville, VA: CFA Institute.
9. -. 2009. DG MARKT: Consultation on control structures in audit firms and their consequences on the audit market. Working paper, CFA Institute.
10. Chan, P., M. Ezzamel, and D. Gwilliam. 1993. Determinants of audit fees for quoted UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 20 (6): 765-786.
11. Chaney, P., D. Jeter, and L. Shivakumar. 2004. Self-selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms. The Accounting Review 79 (1): 51-72. (Pubitemid 38260525)
12. Clatworthy, M., G. Makepeace, and M. Peel. 2009. Selection bias and the Big Four premium: New evidence using Heckman and matching models. Accounting and Business Research 39 (2): 139-166.
13. Cram, D., V. Karan, and I. Stuart. 2009. Three threats to validity of choice-based and matched sample studies in accounting research. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (2): 477-516.
14. Craswell, A., J. Francis, and S. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (3): 297-322.
15. Davis, L. R., D. N. Ricchiute, and G. Trompeter. 1993. Audit effort, audit fees, and the provision of nonaudit services to audit clients. The Accounting Review 68 (1): 135-150.
16. DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183-199.
17. Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (1): 1-36. (Pubitemid 126489395)
18. DeFond, M., J. Francis, and T. Wong. 2000. Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (1): 49-66.
19. Dehejia, R., and S. Wahba. 1999. Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (4): 1053-1062.
20. -, and . 2002. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84(1): 151-161.
21. -.2005. Practical propensity-score matching: A reply to Smith and Todd. Journal of Econometrics 125 (1-2): 355-364.
22. Dopuch, N., and D. Simunic. 1980. The nature of competition in the auditing profession: a descriptive and normative view. In Regulation and the Accounting Profession, 34, (2): edited by J. Buckley and F. Weston, 283-289. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications.
23. Dow Jones News Service. 2002. Grant Thornton acquires Andersen partners in Houston. (June 13).
24. Easton, P. 2004. PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review 79 (1): 73-95. (Pubitemid 38260526)
25. Farber, D. 2005. Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review 80 (2): 539-561. (Pubitemid 40707376)
26. Ferguson, A., J. Francis, and D. Stokes. 2003. The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review 78 (2): 429-448. (Pubitemid 36571253)
27. Feroz, E., K. Park, and V. Pastena. 1991. The financial and market effects of the SEC's accounting and auditing enforcement releases. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Supplement): 107-142.
28. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 1987. Statement of Cash Flows. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
29. Francis, J. 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (2): 133-151.
30. -, and D. Stokes. 1986. Audit prices, product differentiation, and scale economies: Further evidence from the Australian market. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (2): 383-393.
31. -, and J. Krishnan. 1999. Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (1): 135-165.
32. -, E. Maydew, and H. Sparks. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 (2): 17-34.
33. -. 2004. What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review 36 (4): 345-368.
34. -, C. Lennox, and Z. Wang. 2010. Selection models in accounting research. Working paper, University of Missouri-Columbia, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, and Nanyang Technological University.
35. -, and M. Yu. 2009. Big Four office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review 84 (5): 1521-1552.
36. Frankel, R., M. Johnson, and K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditors' fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 71-105. (Pubitemid 36208805)
37. Geiger, M., and D. Rama. 2006. Audit firm size and going-concem reporting accuracy. Accounting Horizons 20 (1): 1-17. (Pubitemid 44846501)
38. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2003. Public Accounting Firms. Mandated Study on Consolidation and Competition. Washington, D.C.: GAO.
39. -. 2008. Audits of Public Companies. Continued Concentration in Audit Market for Large Public Companies does not Call for Immediate Action. Washington, D.C.: GAO.
40. Guay, W, S. P. Kothari, and R. Watts. 1996. A market-based evaluation of discretionary-accrual models. Journal of Accounting Research 34 (Supplement): 83-115.
41. Guenther, D. A., and M. Willenborg. 1999. Capital gains tax rates and the cost of capital for small business: Evidence from the IPO market. Journal of Financial Economics 53 (3): 385-408.
42. Gul, F., K. J. Kim, and A. Qiu. 2009. Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Economics. 95 (3): 425-442
43. Guo, S., and M. Fraser. 2010. Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
44. Hastie, T., and R. Tibshirani. 1990. Generalized Additive Models. London, U.K.: Chapman and Hall.
45. Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (1): 141-191. (Pubitemid 43528545)
46. Heckman, J. 1979. The sample bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1): 153-162.
47. -, H. Ichimura, and P. Todd. 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies 64 (4): 605-654. (Pubitemid 127466391)
48. -,-, and -. 1998. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. the Review of Economic Studies 65 (2): 261-294.
49. -, and S. Navarro-Lozano. 2004. Using matching, instrumental variables, and control functions to estimate economic choice models. The Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1): 30-57. (Pubitemid 38422765)
50. Hribar, P., and C. Nichols. 2007. The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (5): 1017-1053.
51. Krishnan, G. 2003. Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (1): 109-126. (Pubitemid 38904389)
52. Khurana, I., and K. Raman. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 473-495. (Pubitemid 38671090)
53. Kothari, S. P., A. Leone, and C. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 163-197. (Pubitemid 40251003)
54. Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (4): 467-492.
55. Lennox, C. 1999. Are large auditors more accurate than small auditors? Accounting and Business Research 29 (3): 217-228.
56. Li, K., and N. Prabhala. 2007. Self-selection models in corporate finance. In Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, edited by B. E. Eckso, 37-86. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
57. Louis, H. 2005. Acquirers' abnormal returns and the non-Big 4 auditor clientele effect. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40 (1-3): 75-99. (Pubitemid 41614937)
58. Mitton, T. 2002. A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 64 (2): 215-241.
59. O'Keefe, T. B., D. A. Simunic, and M. T. Stein. 1994. The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (2): 241-261.
60. Palmrose, Z. V. 1988. An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review 63 (1): 55-73.
61. Ramsey, J. 1969. Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 31 (2): 350-371.
62. Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 (1): 41-55.
63. Simunic, D. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161-190.
64. Smart, S., and C. Zutter. 2003. Control as a motivation for under pricing: A comparison of dual and single-class IPOs. Journal of Financial Economics 69 (1): 85-110. (Pubitemid 36742376)
65. Weber, J., and M. Willenborg. 2003. Do expert informational intermediaries add value? Evidence from auditors in microcap IPOs. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (4): 681-720. (Pubitemid 37023240)
66. Whisenant, S., S. Sankaraguruswamy, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. Evidence on the joint determination of audit and nonaudit fees. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (4): 721-744. (Pubitemid 37023241)
67. White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heterosk-edasticity. Econometrica 48 (4): 817-838.
68. Zmijewski, M. 1984. Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (Supplement): 59-82.